| Literature DB >> 29795794 |
Toni C Antonucci1, Kristine J Ajrouch2, Jasmine A Manalel3.
Abstract
Social relations, although basic to human nature, health and well-being, have become increasingly complicated as a result of changing population demography and technology. In this essay, we provide a historical overview of social relations, especially as they affect older people. We briefly review the evolution of theory and measurement surrounding social relations as well as early empirical evidence. We consider how social relations have changed over time as well as continuity and change regarding basic characteristics of social relations. Of special interest is the emerging influence of technology on how people maintain contact, especially the changing ways people can use technology to increase, decrease, maintain, or avoid social relations. We consider both negative and positive aspects of these new technologies and their influence on health and well-being. Finally, we conclude that new and emerging technologies hold great promise for the future by overcoming traditional barriers to maintaining social contact, support exchange, and information acquisition. Nevertheless, we caution that these new technologies can have the dehumanizing effect of distance thus creating the potential for insensitivity and increased negativity. In sum, we are cautiously optimistic about the promise of technology to expand, but not replace, traditional forms of social contact.Entities:
Keywords: Health; Intergenerational; Social contact; Social support; Technology
Year: 2017 PMID: 29795794 PMCID: PMC5954608 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igx029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Innov Aging ISSN: 2399-5300
Social Relations Study Wave 3 (Time 2) Sample Descriptives (N = 557)
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.8 (16.0) | |
| Education (years) | 14.2 (2.1) | |
| Female | 355 (63.7) | |
| Married/living with partner | 346 (62.1) | |
| Have children | 468 (84.0) |
Note. Includes nonindependent sample of respondents who completed interviews at both Time 1 and Time 2. M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
Descriptive Statistics for Contact Frequency With Network Members via Different Modes
| In person | Telephone | Electronic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Mother | 3.30 (1.16) | 94 | 3.71 (1.16) | 94 | 2.27 (1.52) | 84 |
| Father | 3.31 (1.16) | 52 | 3.31 (1.16) | 52 | 1.98 (1.41) | 50 |
| Child | 3.53 (1.12) | 204 | 3.96 (1.00) | 205 | 3.47 (1.42) | 155 |
| Spouse | 4.88 (0.50) | 180 | 4.09 (1.35) | 179 | 3.39 (1.75) | 147 |
| Friend | 3.02 (1.17) | 187 | 3.62 (1.08) | 187 | 3.11 (1.56) | 150 |
Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation.
Contact frequency ranged from 1 = not at all to 5 = daily.
Figure 1.Relationship quality by age interaction effect on in-person contact with father.
Figure 2.Relationship quality by age interaction effect on telephone contact with spouse.
Figure 3.Relationship quality by age interaction effect on telephone contact with friend.
Figure 4.Relationship quality by age interaction effect on electronic contact with child.