Literature DB >> 29795710

Generalized Confidence Intervals Compatible with the Min Test for Simultaneous Comparisons of One Subpopulation to Several Other Subpopulations.

Julia N Soulakova1.   

Abstract

A problem where one subpopulation is compared to several other subpopulations in terms of means with the goal of estimating the smallest difference between the means commonly arises in biology, medicine, and many other scientific fields. A generalization of Strassburger, Bretz and Hochberg (2004) approach for two comparisons is presented for cases with three and more comparisons. The method allows constructing an interval-estimator for the smallest mean difference, which is compatible with the Min test. An application to a fluency-disorder study is illustrated. Simulations confirmed adequate probability coverage for normally distributed outcomes for a number of designs.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29795710      PMCID: PMC5962299          DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1212072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods        ISSN: 0361-0926            Impact factor:   0.893


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of a combination drug with multiple doses in unbalanced factorial design clinical trials.

Authors:  H M Hung
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Properties of multiple intersection-union tests for multiple endpoints in combination therapy trials.

Authors:  P H Westfall; S Y Ho; B A Prillaman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Sample size determination for testing whether an identified treatment is best.

Authors:  M Horn; R Vollandt; C W Dunnett
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  On identifying effective and superior drug combinations via Holm's procedure based on the min tests.

Authors:  Julia N Soulakova
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  Large sample tests for binary outcomes in fixed-dose combination drug studies.

Authors:  S J Wang; H M Hung
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Testing whether an identified treatment is best.

Authors:  E M Laska; M J Meisner
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Stuttering attitudes of students: Professional, intracultural, and international comparisons.

Authors:  Kenneth O St Louis; Aneta M Przepiorka; Ann Beste-Guldborg; Mandy J Williams; Agata Blachnio; Jacqueline Guendouzi; Isabella K Reichel; Mercedes B Ware
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Evaluating the efficacy of a combination therapy.

Authors:  S M Snapinn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Testing for the existence of a desirable dose combination.

Authors:  H M Hung; G Y Chi; R J Lipicky
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Menthol cigarettes, race/ethnicity, and biomarkers of tobacco use in U.S. adults: the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Authors:  Miranda R Jones; Benjamin J Apelberg; Maria Tellez-Plaza; Jonathan M Samet; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.