| Literature DB >> 29795649 |
Meng-Che Tsai1, Carol Strong2, Wan-Ting Chen3, Chih-Ting Lee4, Chung-Ying Lin5.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the longitudinal impacts of pubertal timing and weight status on Internet use in adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29795649 PMCID: PMC5967734 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics of subjects (N =2430).
| Male (N = 1241) | Female (N = 1189) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 13.28 (±0.45) | 13.30 (±0.46) | 0.177 |
| Pubertal developmental scale at W1 | 9.47 (±2.25) | 11.35 (±2.11) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index at W1 | 20.43 (±4.19) | 19.51 (±3.18) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index at W3 | 21.04 (±3.98) | 20.32 (±3.15) | <0.001 |
| Family monthly income (NTD) | 0.827 | ||
| < 30000 | 203 (18.0) | 192 (16.1) | |
| 30000–60000 | 487 (43.2) | 481 (40.5) | |
| >60000 | 438 (38.8) | 409 (34.4) | |
| Internet use at W3 | <0.001 | ||
| < 1 hour/week | 272 (21.9) | 439 (36.9) | |
| 1–2 hours/week | 215 (17.3) | 332 (27.9) | |
| 3–5 hours/week | 262 (21.1) | 244 (20.5) | |
| 6–10 hours/week | 159 (12.8) | 107 (9.0) | |
| 11–20 hours/week | 147 (11.8) | 43 (3.6) | |
| > 20 hours/week | 186 (15.0) | 24 (2.0) | |
| Leisure purpose of Internet use at W3 | |||
| Chatting | 340 (27.4) | 519 (43.7) | <0.001 |
| Gaming | 870 (70.1) | 256 (21.5) | <0.001 |
| Non-academic browsing | 499 (40.2) | 661 (55.6) | <0.001 |
| Pornography viewing | 77 (6.2) | 4 (0.3) | <0.001 |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean (± standard deviation). Comparison of variables between male and female participants was examined by student t test and χ2 test accordingly. NTD represents New Taiwan Dollar; W1, Wave 1; W3, Wave 3.
Univariate and multivariate association between time of Internet use and pubertal timing and weight status.
| Internet use (hours/week) | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1 | 2–3 | 3–5 | 5–10 | 11–20 | >20 | p-value | OR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |
| Pubertal timing, N (%) | |||||||||
| Early puberty | 98 (24.9) | 89 (22.6) | 78 (19.8) | 45 (11.5) | 37 (9.4) | 46 (11.7) | 0.341 | 1.36 (1.11–1.66) | 1.35 (1.10–1.66) |
| On-time puberty | 489 (30.6) | 371 (23.2) | 334 (20.9) | 166 (10.4) | 118 (7.4) | 122 (7.6) | Reference | Reference | |
| Late puberty | 124 (28.4) | 87 (19.9) | 94 (21.5) | 55 (12.6) | 35 (8.0) | 42 (9.6) | 1.18 (0.96–1.43) | 1.15 (0.94–1.41) | |
| BMI at W1, N (%) | |||||||||
| Thin weight | 79 (27.9) | 67 (23.7) | 63 (22.3) | 28 (9.9) | 23 (8.1) | 23 (8,1) | 0.409 | 1.07 (0.84–1.33) | 0.89 (0.67–1.20) |
| Normal weight | 539 (29.9) | 400 (22.2) | 375 (20.8) | 201 (11.2) | 131 (7.3) | 154 (8.6) | Reference | Reference | |
| Overweight | 64 (27.4) | 54 (23.1) | 47 (20.1) | 24 (10.3) | 24 (10.3) | 21 (9.0) | 1.08 (0.84–1.38) | 1.07 (0.76–1.51) | |
| Obesity | 29 (26.6) | 26 (23.9) | 21 (19.3) | 13 (11.9) | 11 (10.1) | 19 (8.3) | 1.12 (0.78–1.60) | 0.96 (0.52–1.79) | |
| BMI at W3, N (%) | |||||||||
| Thin weight | 72 (27.5) | 47 (17.9) | 50 (19.1) | 41 (15.6) | 23 (8.8) | 29 (11.1) | 0.795 | 1.39 (1.09–1.77) | 1.46 (1.08–1.95) |
| Normal weight | 544 (29.6) | 428 (23.4) | 386 (21.0) | 193 (10.5) | 136 (7.4) | 149 (8.1) | Reference | Reference | |
| Overweight | 64 (29.4) | 47 (21.6) | 50 (22.9) | 19 (8.7) | 20 (9.2) | 18 (8.3) | 1.02 (0.79–1.32) | 0.99 (0.69–1.42) | |
| Obesity | 31 (27.2) | 25 (21.9) | 20 (17.5) | 13 (11.4) | 11 (9.6) | 14 (12.3) | 1.24 (0.87–1.76) | 1.26 (0.67–2.36) | |
| ΔBMI-SDS, Mean (SD) | 0.004 (.557) | 0.010 (.554) | 0.008 (.463) | -0.047 (.451) | -0.032 (.495) | 0.031 (.574) | 0.554 | 0.95 (0.83–1.10) | 0.98 (0.81–1.18) |
OR represents odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; aOR represents adjusted odds ratio; BMI-SDS, standardized score of body mass index; SD, standard deviation; W1, Wave 1; W3, Wave 3. Family monthly income was adjusted in univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis.
Association between the purposes of Internet use and pubertal timing and weight status among male adolescents.
| Chatting | Gaming | Non-academic browsing | Pornography viewing | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | |
| Pubertal development | ||||||||
| Early puberty | 69 (29.5) | 1.01 (0.72–1.41) | 163 (69.7) | 0.89 (0.63–1.24) | 1.17 (0.86–1.61) | 1.84 (1.04–3.28) | ||
| On-time puberty | 204 (28.3) | Reference | 508 (70.5) | Reference | Reference | Reference | ||
| Late puberty | 67 (23.4) | 0.72 (0.51–1.02) | 199 (69.6) | 0.93 (0.68–1.28) | 0.76 (0.56–1.03) | 1.07 (0.55–2.08) | ||
| BMI at W1 | ||||||||
| Low weight | 32 (22.9) | 0.83 (0.50–1.39) | 0.72 (0.45–1.14) | 43 (30.7) | 0.71 (0.46–1.13) | 0.67 (0.22–2.00) | ||
| Normal weight | 251 (27.6) | Reference | Reference | 373 (41.1) | Reference | Reference | ||
| Overweight | 33 (25.4) | 0.93 (0.51–1.69) | 0.83 (0.47–1.46) | 60 (46.2) | 1.16 (0.68–1.99) | 1.12 (0.37–3.37) | ||
| Obesity | 22 (37.3) | 2.11 (0.74–6.02) | 1.98 (0.64–6.14) | 21 (35.6) | 0.86 (0.32–2.30) | 5.21 (0.93–29.22) | ||
| BMI at W3 | ||||||||
| Thin weight | 31 (21.8) | 0.86 (0.51–1.45) | 96 (67.6) | 0.99 (0.62–1.60) | 44 (31) | 0.89 (0.56–1.42) | 6 (4.2) | 0.83 (0.28–2.48) |
| Normal weight | 254 (27.7) | Reference | 642 (70) | Reference | 375 (40.9) | Reference | 55 (6) | Reference |
| Overweight | 34 (28.3) | 0.93 (0.51–1.72) | 82 (68.3) | 0.83 (0.46–1.48) | 54 (45) | 1.18 (0.68–2.04) | 10 (8.3) | 1.04 (0.35–3.11) |
| Obesity | 21 (33.9) | 0.75 (0.29–2.13) | 50 (80.6) | 1.12 (0.39–3.23) | 26 (31.9) | 1.02 (0.39–2.65) | 6 (9.7) | 0.49 (0.08–2.99) |
| ΔBMI-SDS W1-3 | 1.16 (0.83–1.61) | 0.98 (0.71–1.35) | 1.15 (0.85–1.55) | 1.25 (0.68–2.28) | ||||
aOR represents adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI-SDS, standardized score of body mass index; W1, Wave 1; W3, Wave 3. A significant difference in the χ2 linear-by-linear test for the association between variables of interest was marked in the bold type. Family monthly income was adjusted in multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.
Association between the purposes of Internet use and pubertal timing and weight status among female adolescents.
| Chatting | Gaming | Non-academic browsing | Pornography viewing | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | N (%) | aOR (95% CI) | |
| Pubertal development | ||||||||
| Early puberty | 78 (49.1) | 1.22 (0.86–1.76) | 27 (17) | 0.59 (0.36–0.96) | 94 (59.1) | 1.07 (0.74–1.53) | 2 (1.3) | NA |
| On-time puberty | 378 (43) | Reference | 190 (21.6) | Reference | 490 (55.7) | Reference | 2 (0.2) | NA |
| Late puberty | 63 (41.7) | 0.90 (0.61–1.32) | 39 (25.8) | 1.06 (0.68–1.64) | 77 (51.0) | 0.78 (0.54–1.14) | 0 (0) | NA |
| BMI at W1 | ||||||||
| Thin weight | 67 (46.9) | 1.34 (0.82–2.21) | 33 (23.1) | 0.54 (0.29–0.99) | 77 (53.8) | 0.82 (0.50–1.34) | 0 (0) | NA |
| Normal weight | 387 (43.4) | Reference | 187 (21) | Reference | 498 (55.8) | Reference | 4 (0.4) | NA |
| Overweight | 46 (44.2) | 0.91 (0.50–1.65) | 25 (24) | 1.92 (0.96–3.83) | 64 (61.5) | 1.36 (0.75–2.49) | 0 (0) | NA |
| Obesity | 19 (38) | 0.57 (0.19–1.65) | 11 (22) | 1.91 (0.52–1.94) | 22 (44) | 0.88 (0.31–2.54) | 0 (0) | NA |
| BMI at W3 | ||||||||
| Thin weight | 51 (42.5) | 0.71 (0.43–1.20) | 36 (30) | 2.50 (1.39–4.48) | 64 (53.3) | 0.98 (0.59–1.64) | 1 (0.8) | NA |
| Normal weight | 402 (43.7) | Reference | 189 (20.6) | Reference | 514 (55.9) | Reference | 2 (0.2) | NA |
| Overweight | 43 (43.9) | 1.07 (0.58–1.98) | 19 (19.4) | 0.56 (0.26–1.20) | 60 (61.2) | 1.03 (0.55–1.92) | 1 (1) | NA |
| Obesity | 23 (44.2) | 1.35 (0.45–4.07) | 12 (23.1) | 0.47 (0.12–1.81) | 23 (44.2) | 0.52 (0.17–1.55) | 0 (0) | NA |
| ΔBMI-SDS W1-3 | 0.96 (0.66–1.30) | 1.27 (0.87–1.86) | 1.26 (0.91–1.74) | NA | ||||
aOR represents adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI-SDS, standardized score of body mass index; W1, Wave 1; W3, Wave 3; NA, not applicable. Family monthly income was adjusted in multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. Due to an insufficient number of pornography viewers, regression analysis was not applicable to the female population