Literature DB >> 29795631

Data-assisted reduced-order modeling of extreme events in complex dynamical systems.

Zhong Yi Wan1, Pantelis Vlachas2, Petros Koumoutsakos2, Themistoklis Sapsis1.   

Abstract

The prediction of extreme events, from avalanches and droughts to tsunamis and epidemics, depends on the formulation and analysis of relevant, complex dynamical systems. Such dynamical systems are characterized by high intrinsic dimensionality with extreme events having the form of rare transitions that are several standard deviations away from the mean. Such systems are not amenable to classical order-reduction methods through projection of the governing equations due to the large intrinsic dimensionality of the underlying attractor as well as the complexity of the transient events. Alternatively, data-driven techniques aim to quantify the dynamics of specific, critical modes by utilizing data-streams and by expanding the dimensionality of the reduced-order model using delayed coordinates. In turn, these methods have major limitations in regions of the phase space with sparse data, which is the case for extreme events. In this work, we develop a novel hybrid framework that complements an imperfect reduced order model, with data-streams that are integrated though a recurrent neural network (RNN) architecture. The reduced order model has the form of projected equations into a low-dimensional subspace that still contains important dynamical information about the system and it is expanded by a long short-term memory (LSTM) regularization. The LSTM-RNN is trained by analyzing the mismatch between the imperfect model and the data-streams, projected to the reduced-order space. The data-driven model assists the imperfect model in regions where data is available, while for locations where data is sparse the imperfect model still provides a baseline for the prediction of the system state. We assess the developed framework on two challenging prototype systems exhibiting extreme events. We show that the blended approach has improved performance compared with methods that use either data streams or the imperfect model alone. Notably the improvement is more significant in regions associated with extreme events, where data is sparse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29795631      PMCID: PMC5967742          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

1.  Predicting chaotic time series.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1987-08-24       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Automated reverse engineering of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Josh Bongard; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations.

Authors:  I E Lagaris; A Likas; D I Fotiadis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1998

4.  Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data.

Authors:  Michael Schmidt; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Nonparametric forecasting of low-dimensional dynamical systems.

Authors:  Tyrus Berry; Dimitrios Giannakis; John Harlim
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2015-03-19

6.  Highly nonlinear wave propagation in elastic woodpile periodic structures.

Authors:  E Kim; F Li; C Chong; G Theocharis; J Yang; P G Kevrekidis
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Dynamical indicators for the prediction of bursting phenomena in high-dimensional systems.

Authors:  Mohammad Farazmand; Themistoklis P Sapsis
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.529

8.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series.

Authors:  G Sugihara; R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach.

Authors:  Jaideep Pathak; Brian Hunt; Michelle Girvan; Zhixin Lu; Edward Ott
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  A variational approach to probing extreme events in turbulent dynamical systems.

Authors:  Mohammad Farazmand; Themistoklis P Sapsis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  New perspectives for the prediction and statistical quantification of extreme events in high-dimensional dynamical systems.

Authors:  Themistoklis P Sapsis
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Hierarchical deep learning of multiscale differential equation time-steppers.

Authors:  Yuying Liu; J Nathan Kutz; Steven L Brunton
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.019

3.  Cluster-based network modeling-From snapshots to complex dynamical systems.

Authors:  Daniel Fernex; Bernd R Noack; Richard Semaan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Multifidelity computing for coupling full and reduced order models.

Authors:  Shady E Ahmed; Omer San; Kursat Kara; Rami Younis; Adil Rasheed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Short- and long-term predictions of chaotic flows and extreme events: a physics-constrained reservoir computing approach.

Authors:  N A K Doan; W Polifke; L Magri
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Data-driven prediction in dynamical systems: recent developments.

Authors:  Amin Ghadami; Bogdan I Epureanu
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.019

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.