Literature DB >> 29794846

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Els Visser1, Sheraz R Markar2, Jelle P Ruurda1, George B Hanna2, Richard van Hillegersberg1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis determines whether increased lymph node yield improves survival in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant therapy.
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy involves resection of the esophagus and surrounding lymph nodes, which are commonly the first stations of cancer spread. The extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains controversial, with several studies publishing conflicting results, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS: An electronic literature search was undertaken using Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane library databases (2000 to 2017). Articles with esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy and investigating the effects of low and high lymph node yield on overall survival and disease-free survival were included. Meta-analysis of data was conducted using a random effects model. If the study divided the cohort into multiple groups based on lymph node yield, survival was compared between the lowest and highest lymph node yield groups. In addition to analysis of the entire cohort, subset analysis of only those patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy was also performed.
RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included in this meta-analysis with a follow-up ranging from 15 to 94 months. For the analysis of overall survival, 23 studies were included. A meta-analysis showed that overall survival significantly improved in the high lymph node yield group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.74-0.87; P < 0.01]. In the 10 studies describing disease-free survival, this was significantly improved in the high lymph node yield group (HR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.62-0.84; P < 0.01). Subset analysis of neoadjuvant-treated patients demonstrated a survival benefit of high lymph node yield on overall survival (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.73-0.92; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates the benefit of an increased lymph node yield from esophagectomy on overall and disease-free survival. In addition, a survival benefit of a high lymph node yield was demonstrated in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29794846     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  22 in total

1.  Implementation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy From a Randomized Controlled Trial Setting to National Practice.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Melody Ni; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Leonie van der Werf; Jennifer Straatman; Donald van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta; George B Hanna; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest for patients with node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large-scale multicenter study.

Authors:  Qi-Xin Shang; Yu-Shang Yang; Li-Yan Xu; Hong Yang; Yin Li; Yi Li; Zhi-Yong Wu; Jian-Hua Fu; Xiao-Dong Yao; Xiu-E Xu; Jian-Yi Wu; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

3.  Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Masaru Hayami; Nelson Ndegwa; Mats Lindblad; Gustav Linder; Jakob Hedberg; David Edholm; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Ioannis Rouvelas
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 4.  [ICG lymph node mapping in cancer surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  Dolores Müller; Raphael Stier; Jennifer Straatman; Benjamin Babic; Lars Schiffmann; Jennifer Eckhoff; Thomas Schmidt; Christiane Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-03

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stepan M Esagian; Ioannis A Ziogas; Konstantinos Skarentzos; Ioannis Katsaros; Georgios Tsoulfas; Daniela Molena; Michalis V Karamouzis; Ioannis Rouvelas; Magnus Nilsson; Dimitrios Schizas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Does the lymph node yield affect survival in patients with esophageal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy plus esophagectomy? A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donglai Chen; Yiming Mao; Yuhang Xue; Yonghua Sang; Desen Liu; Yongbing Chen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-07-31

7.  Textbook outcome for esophageal cancer surgery: an international consensus-based update of a quality measure.

Authors:  Marianne C Kalff; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  A novel nomogram with preferable capability in predicting the overall survival of patients after radical esophageal cancer resection based on accessible clinical indicators: A comparison with AJCC staging.

Authors:  Xinye Li; Jinming Xu; Linhai Zhu; Sijia Yang; Li Yu; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Combined CT texture analysis and nodal axial ratio for detection of nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Han Na Lee; Jung Im Kim; So Youn Shin; Dae Hyun Kim; Chanwoo Kim; Il Ki Hong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Anastomotic Leak Does Not Impact on Long-Term Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; M Navidi; S Wahed; A Immanuel; N Hayes; S M Griffin; A W Phillips
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.