Literature DB >> 29794711

Predictors of Patient Satisfaction and Postoperative Complications in Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

Jonathan P Massie1,2, Shane D Morrison1,2, Judy Van Maasdam1,2, Thomas Satterwhite1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the current gold standard procedure for male-to-female transgender patients seeking gender-confirming genital surgery. Although complication data have been reported extensively in the literature, studies on patient-reported outcomes are sparse. This study aimed to report both postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes from the largest cohort in the United States to date to undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty. Ultimately, the authors hoped to identify the predictors of postoperative complications and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a single surgeon's experience with penile inversion vaginoplasty was performed from July of 2014 to June of 2016. Patient demographic data, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome data were collected. Data were correlated by binary logistic regression to determine predictors of postoperative complications and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. The most common complications were granulation tissue (26 percent), intravaginal scarring (20 percent), and prolonged pain (20 percent). Overwhelmingly, patients reported "feeling positively about their genitals" (94 percent) and "would do this operation again" (94 percent). Seventy-one percent of patients reported resolution of their gender dysphoria. The top predictors of patient dissatisfaction were intravaginal scarring, prolonged pain, excessive external scarring, loss of sensation, and hematoma/excessive bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of penile inversion vaginoplasty in the United States to report on both postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes. Despite moderate complication risk, patient satisfaction remains very high after penile inversion vaginoplasty, with the majority of patients reporting improvement of their gender dysphoria. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794711     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgical satisfaction and quality of life outcomes reported by transgender men and women at least one year post gender-affirming surgery: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Christienne Javier; Charlie R Crimston; Fiona Kate Barlow
Journal:  Int J Transgend Health       Date:  2022-03-18

2.  Body Mass Index Requirements for Gender-Affirming Surgeries Are Not Empirically Based.

Authors:  Lisa M Brownstone; Jaclyn DeRieux; Devin A Kelly; Lanie J Sumlin; Jennifer L Gaudiani
Journal:  Transgend Health       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Transfeminine Gender Confirmation Surgery with Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty: An Initial Experience.

Authors:  John T Loree; Mark S Burke; Bridgett Rippe; Sarah Clarke; Samuel H Moore; Thom R Loree
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-21

4.  'Modified Phallourethroplasty' as a Surgical Alternative to Phalloplasty With Urethral Lengthening: Technique, How We Present This Option to Patients, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Nance Yuan; Grace Lee; Jenna Stelmar; Edward Ray; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.523

5.  Achieving Correct Axis and Good Depth in Gender Affirming Vaginoplasties by Penile-Perineoscrotal Flap Vaginoplasty.

Authors:  Richie Gupta; Rajat Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  Impact of the initial experience in the penile inversion vaginoplasty technique on satisfaction levels: a pilot retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Pedro De Pablos-Rodríguez; Josep Torremadé Barreda; Begoña Etcheverry Giadrosich; Silvia De La Torre González; Meritxell Sampera Condeminas; Oriol Bermejo Segú; Maria Fiol Riera; Albert Pi López; Marc Barahona Orpinell; Ana López Ojeda; Francesc Vigués Julià
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-08

Review 7.  Factors that drive mental health disparities and promote well-being in transgender and nonbinary people.

Authors:  Elliot A Tebbe; Stephanie L Budge
Journal:  Nat Rev Psychol       Date:  2022-09-26

8.  Comparison of Permanent Hair Removal Procedures before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Why We Should Consider Laser Hair Removal as a First-Line Treatment for Patients Who Meet Criteria.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Alexandra Terris Feldman; Patrick Chin; Michael Zaliznyak; Susan Rabizadeh; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.523

9.  Evaluation of the surgical and functional outcomes of secondary vaginoplasties with free skin mesh graft in patients following transfeminine genital reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Miriam de Toni Abboud; Gabriel Veber Moisés da Silva; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Patric Machado Tavares; Francisco E Martins; Tiago Elias Rosito
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-09

10.  Breast augmentation in male-to-female transgender patients: Technical considerations and outcomes.

Authors:  Travis J Miller; Stelios C Wilson; Jonathan P Massie; Shane D Morrison; Thomas Satterwhite
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2019-04-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.