Literature DB >> 29794693

The Impact of Mastectomy Weight on Reconstructive Trends and Outcomes in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Progressively Greater Complications with Larger Breast Size.

Jordan D Frey1,2, Ara A Salibian1,2, Nolan S Karp1,2, Mihye Choi1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstructive trends and outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy continue to be defined. The graduated impact of breast size and mastectomy weight remains incompletely evaluated.
METHODS: All patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy from 2006 to June of 2016 were identified. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed and stratified by mastectomy weight of 800 g or higher (large group), between 799 and 400 g (intermediate group), and less than 400 g (small group).
RESULTS: Of 809 nipple-sparing mastectomies, 66 (8.2 percent) had mastectomy weights of 800 g or higher, 328 (40.5 percent) had mastectomy weights between 799 and 400 g, and 415 nipple-sparing mastectomies (51.3 percent) had mastectomy weights less than 400 g. Nipple-sparing mastectomies in the large group were significantly more likely to be associated with major mastectomy flap necrosis (p = 0.0005), complete nipple-areola complex necrosis (p < 0.0001), explantation (p < 0.0001), cellulitis treated with oral (p = 0.0008) and intravenous (p = 0.0126) antibiotics, abscess (p = 0.0254), and seroma (p = 0.0126) compared with those in the intermediate group. Compared with small nipple-sparing mastectomies, patients in the large group had greater major mastectomy flap necrosis (p < 0.0001), complete (p < 0.0001) and partial (p = 0.0409) nipple-areola complex necrosis, explantation (p < 0.0001), cellulitis treated with oral (p < 0.0001) and intravenous (p < 0.0001) antibiotics, abscess (p = 0.0119), and seroma (p < 0.0001). Patients in the intermediate group were more likely to experience major (p < 0.0001) and minor (p < 0.0001) mastectomy flap necrosis, complete (p = 0.0015) and partial (p < 0.0001) nipple-areola complex necrosis, cellulitis treated with oral antibiotics (p = 0.0062), and seroma (p = 0.0248) compared with those undergoing small nipple-sparing mastectomies. Larger mastectomy weights were significant predictors of complications on logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: Reconstructive and ischemic complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy are progressively greater as mastectomy weight and breast size increase. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794693     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  The investigation of the relation between expansion strategy and outcomes of two-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Min Ji Kim; Woo Beom Lee; Il Jae Lee; Hyung Min Hahn; Duy Quang Thai; Ji Young Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Ischemic Complications after Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: Predictors of Reconstructive Failure in Implant-based Reconstruction and Implications for Decision-making.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Jonathan M Bekisz; Nolan S Karp; Mihye Choi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-23

3.  Comparison of complications according to incision types in nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

Authors:  Soeun Park; Changik Yoon; Soong June Bae; Chihwan Cha; Dooreh Kim; Janghee Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Tai Suk Roh; Young Seok Kim; Joon Jeong
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  What Is in a Number? Evaluating a Risk Assessment Tool in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Ara A Salibian; Jonathan M Bekisz; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp; Vishal D Thanik
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-31

5.  Skin-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Nipple Graft for Large, Ptotic Breast.

Authors:  Eun Key Kim; Jeong Mok Cho; Jong Won Lee
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.588

6.  Impact of Body Composition on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiae Moon; Jeea Lee; Dong Won Lee; Hye Jung Shin; Sumin Lee; Yhenseung Kang; Na Young Kim; Hyung Seok Park
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Identification of Independent Risk Factors for Skin Complications in a Multifactorial Logistic Regression Analysis of Simultaneous Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Skin Reduction Mastectomy in Large and Ptotic Breasts Using an Inferiorly Based Deepithelialized Dermal Breast Flap.

Authors:  Felix H Vollbach; Benjamin F Thomas; Hisham Fansa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.