Literature DB >> 29794266

Chronic pelvic pain - pain catastrophizing, pelvic pain and quality of life.

Megan Sewell1, Leonid Churilov2,3, Samantha Mooney4, Tony Ma4, Peter Maher5, Sonia R Grover1,5.   

Abstract

Background and aims Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) impacts significantly on the lives of women. Negative coping responses such as pain catastrophizing are thought to be significant in predicting both pain severity and outcome. The combined effect of the individual's response to pain and its severity on their quality of life (QoL) has not been well studied in women with CPP. Aims were to determine the prevalence of pain catastrophizing in women with CPP and to examine the associations between pain catastrophizing and levels of dysmenorrhea, non-cyclical pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysuria, dyschezia and QoL. Methods A cross-sectional study including women aged 18-50 years, referred to a tertiary gynecology outpatients department at an Australian women's hospital in 2015. Participants completed questionnaires including: pain catastrophizing scale (PCS); pelvic pain levels in the prior 3 months; and the World Health Organisation Quality of life - Bref Questionnaire (WHOQoL-Bref). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA (StataCorp, USA Version13). Results Participants (n = 115) had a median age of 29.0 [interquartile range (IQR): 23.0-38.0] years. The Pain catastrophizing score revealed that 60/113 [95% confidence interval (CI): 48.6, 71.2] of participants had a clinically relevant total score ≥30. There were statistically significant positive correlations between pain catastrophizing scores and pelvic pain levels in all five pain categories studied, dysmenorrhea (ρ = 0.37, p = 0.0001), non-cyclical pelvic pain (ρ = 0.46, p<0.0001), dyspareunia (ρ = 0.32, p = 0.0008), dysuria (ρ = 0.32, p = 0.0005) and dyschezia (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.0012). Participants who reported maximal pain levels (5/5) had significantly higher median pain catastrophizing scores when compared to those who reported no pain (0/5) in all categories. Overall QoL was considered as "good" in 71/113 (95% CI: 60.1, 81.0) participants and "poor" in 42/113 (95% CI: 32.0, 53.0) participants. Comparison to Australian female norms revealed significantly lower QoL scores in the physical domain, across all ages, and in psychological domain for those aged <30 and 30-40 years. There was a significant association between increased catastrophizing scores and reduced odds of good QoL. An increase in PCS by one point is associated with a 6.3% decrease in the odds of good QoL [odds ratio (OR) per one-point increase: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.98), p = 0.008]. Conclusions Pain catastrophizing is prevalent at clinically relevant levels in women with CPP across all domains. It is associated with higher pain levels and decreased QoL. Implications There is potential for further studies to investigate the predictive nature of pain catastrophizing and management targeting catastrophizing to improve outcomes in women with CPP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pelvic pain; pain catastrophizing; pain perception; pelvic pain; quality of life; women

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794266     DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Pain        ISSN: 1877-8860


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency in the physiotherapeutic treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  A Carralero-Martínez; M A Muñoz Pérez; R Pané-Alemany; L Blanco-Ratto; S Kauffmann; I Ramírez-García
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 2.  Preclinical models of endometriosis and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: an Innovative Medicines Initiative-PainCare initiative to improve their value for translational research in pelvic pain.

Authors:  Paulina Nunez-Badinez; Bianca De Leo; Alexis Laux-Biehlmann; Anja Hoffmann; Thomas M Zollner; Philippa T K Saunders; Ioannis Simitsidellis; Ana Charrua; Francisco Cruz; Raul Gomez; Miguel Angel Tejada; Stephen B McMahon; Laure Lo Re; Florent Barthas; Katy Vincent; Judy Birch; Jane Meijlink; Lone Hummelshoj; Patrick J Sweeney; J Douglas Armstrong; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Jens Nagel
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Study on Pain Catastrophizing From 2010 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace.

Authors:  Huifang Luo; Zongliao Cai; Yanyi Huang; Jiating Song; Qing Ma; Xiangwei Yang; Yang Song
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-17

4.  Health-related quality of life of Malaysian patients with chronic non-malignant pain and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ju-Ying Ang; E-Li Leong; Huan-Keat Chan; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Shi-Qi Lee; Punita Mutiah; Ronald Vei-Meng Lim; Chia-Ming Loo; R Usha S Rajah; Mazlila Meor Ahmad Shah; Zubaidah Jamil Osman; Lee-Choo Yeoh; Devanandhini Krisnan; Kavita Bhojwani
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain and primary dysmenorrhea in women of reproductive age in Ecuador.

Authors:  Carmen Yolanda de Las Mercedes Villa Rosero; Suleimy Cristina Mazin; Antonio Alberto Nogueira; José Antonio Vargas-Costales; Julio Cesar Rosa-E-Silva; Francisco José Candido-Dos-Reis; Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Work Ability and Quality of Life in Patients with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Chang; Chang-Ming Yeh; Shu-Ling Huang; Chi-Chung Ho; Ren-Hau Li; Wei-Hsun Wang; Feng-Cheng Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.