Literature DB >> 29794165

Limited Mutation-Rate Variation Within the Paramecium aurelia Species Complex.

Hongan Long1, Thomas G Doak2, Michael Lynch3.   

Abstract

Mutation is one of the most fundamental evolutionary forces. Studying variation in the mutation rate within and among closely-related species can help reveal mechanisms of genome divergence, but such variation is unstudied in the vast majority of organisms. Previous studies on ciliated protozoa have found extremely low mutation rates. In this study, using mutation-accumulation techniques combined with deep whole-genome sequencing, we explore the germline base-substitution mutation-rate variation of three cryptic species in the Paramecium aurelia species complex-P. biaurelia, P. sexaurelia, and P. tetraurelia We find that there is extremely limited variation of the mutation rate and spectrum in the three species and confirm the extremely low mutation rate of ciliates.
Copyright © 2018 Long et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ciliated protozoa; mutation-accumulation; neutral evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794165      PMCID: PMC6027866          DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)        ISSN: 2160-1836            Impact factor:   3.154


Mutation is one of the main evolutionary forces driving genome evolution of organisms. Mutation accumulation (MA) techniques combined with deep whole-genome sequencing have greatly advanced genome-wide mutation-rate studies (Bateman 1959; Mukai 1964; Lynch ). During MA, from a single-individual ancestor, multiple lineages are established and repeatedly single-individual transferred. Selection is greatly reduced by such strong population bottlenecks, and genetic drift plays the major role in the fate of mutations, allowing the random accumulation of most spontaneous mutations. Although microbial eukaryotes represent the majority of eukaryotic species diversity (Green ; Mcgrath and Katz 2004; Mora ; Katz and Grant 2014) and have extremely divergent genome architecture (Lynch 2007), spontaneous mutations are notoriously difficult to study in these species. This is mostly due to the rarity of mutations (mutation rates in the range of 10−12 to 10−10 per nucleotide site per cell division), laborious culturing/transfers, lack of reference genomes, etc. As a consequence, genomic mutation rates of only a few microbial eukaryotes have been estimated directly (Lynch ; Saxer ; Sung ; Zhu ; Farlow ; Ness ; Long ; Long ; Hamilton ; Long ). An investigation of mutation-rate variation in microbial eukaryotes may help reveal mechanisms of mutation-rate evolution. The Paramecium aurelia species complex is one of the best-studied model ciliates in genetics and epigenetics (Sonneborn 1975; Bétermier 2004; Aury ; Beale and Preer 2008; Johri ). This species complex consists of 14 cryptic species, which are morphologically indistinguishable from each other (Sonnerborn 1975). As with most ciliates, these species are binuclear, with a transcriptionally inert micronucleus (germline nucleus) and a transcriptionally active macronucleus (somatic nucleus) during vegetative growth. The micronucleus facilitates a unique MA opportunity in which mutations accumulate in a near-neutral manner (Sung ; Long ). This species complex also has the capacity for autogamous sexual reproduction, during which a whole-genome homozygote is developed from a single haploid germline genome. This greatly facilitates the localization of mutations accumulated in the germline micronucleus, which is otherwise transcriptionally silent during vegetative growth (and this also facilitates accumulating spontaneous mutations in an effectively neutral fashion). The germline mutations are amplified and made homozygous in the subsequent macronucleus after the autogamy process. Species within the P. aurelia complex diverged >100 million years ago based on the known mutation rate in P. tetraurelia (Catania ; Sung ; Johri ). These Paramecium species have different genomic G/C contents and genetic diversity (Aury ; Catania ; Johri ), both of which might be related to differences in genome-wide mutational features, such as bias in the mutation spectrum—which is a strong evolutionary force in determining the genomic G/C composition across organisms (Long ). Here, we conducted a two-year mutation accumulation experiment on two closely-related species: P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia. Together with the mutation rate previously reported for a related species, P. tetraurelia (Sung ), we explore the base-pair substitution mutation-rate variation of the Paramecium aurelia species complex.

Materials and Methods

Strains, medium, and MA line transfers

We chose two species of the Paramecium aurelia complex for the mutation accumulation experiments: P. biaurelia V1-4 and P. sexaurelia AZ8-4. After two rounds of autogamy, single cells of the two strains were used to initiate the MA lines (48 lines for P. biaurelia and 32 for P. sexaurelia). MA lines were cultured in 150 µl Sonneborn’s Paramecium medium inoculated with Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae. For each MA line—because a single cell could not always establish a new culture—we transferred eight single cells of each MA line to eight individual wells with medium on a 96-well plate using a dissection microscope; after two or three days, another eight single cells from the established culture were then transferred to wells and so on. Every three weeks, all MA lines were starved for five days to induce autogamy to renew the macronuclei. Autogamy was confirmed by Hoechst 33342 staining and fluorescence microscopy. In order to estimate the number of cell divisions between two consecutive transfers, total cells of each MA line after one culturing cycle were counted on a hemocytometer every month. The grand averages of cell divisions in one culturing cycle were 5.1 and 6.6 for P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia respectively. In total, we conducted 156 and 148 transfers on average for P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia respectively.

DNA extraction, library construction, genome sequencing, and mutation analyses

After the final round of autogamy of all survived MA lines and manually washing off bacteria with 1× PBS on a dissection microscope (1× PBS paralyzes Paramecium cells which then stick to the bottom of Petri dishes, easing washing off food bacteria), we extracted DNA using the phenol-chloroform method. High-quality genomic DNA was then used to construct DNA libraries with the Nextera Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina). Size-selection for an insert size of 300 bp was performed and the libraries sequenced using HiSeq2500 2×150 rapid run at the Hubbard Center for Genome Studies, University of New Hampshire. After removing lines with low coverage or cross-contamination, 32 and 18 MA lines of P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia respectively were used in the final mutation analyses. We followed Long for mutation analyses except that HaplotypeCaller in GATK 3.6 with standard hard filters (except MQ ≥ 60; all non-mutated lines support a different base) was used to call base-substitution mutations that only occurred in one MA line. All corresponding statistics were conducted in R 3.3.2. Read alignment for all mutation sites was validated visually with the Integrated Genome Viewer (IGV v. 2.3.5) (Thorvaldsdottir ). Equilibrium G/C composition by mutation pressure alone (p) was calculated by following Lynch (2007):where u is the mutation rate in the G/C direction (including A:T→G:C transitions and A:T→C:G transversions) and v is the mutation rate in the A/T direction (including G:C→A:T transitions and G:C→T:A transversions). Mutation bias in the G/C direction, m, was calculated by m = u/v.

Data availability

Illumina sequence reads of MA lines in BAM format were deposited under a NCBI BioProject with accession number PRJNA394918, SRA No.: SRP113815. The authors state that all data necessary for confirming the conclusions presented in the article are represented fully within the article. Supplemental material available at Figshare: https://doi.org/10.25387/g3.6340790.

Results and Discussion

From a single cell of each strain, we established 48 and 32 MA lines for P. biaurelia V1-4 and P. sexaurelia AZ8-4, respectively. Each MA line was transferred every two or three days and experienced periodic autogamy to avoid macronuclear senescence. The period of single-cell transfers (156 and 148 transfers on average, i.e., ∼800 and 980 cell divisions; Supplemental Table S1) extended for 17 months. 34 and 21 lines survived to the end of this period. For precise mutation analysis, we require MA lines with genome sequence coverage > 20× and without cross-line contamination. 32 and 18 final MA lines fulfilled these requirements for the final mutation analyses. Mean depth of coverage for the two species is 68× and 89× per line. After we filtered out reads that did not pass the quality filters, on average 62 and 85% of the two species’ MA line genomes were covered with high-quality/high-depth reads (Supplemental Material: Table S1). We detected 29 and 24 base-pair substitutions in P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia respectively, yielding mutation rates of 2.44 × 10−11 (95% Poisson confidence interval 1.63–3.50 × 10−11, P. biaurelia; transition/transversion ratio 1.90) and 2.42 × 10−11 (1.55–3.61 × 10−11, P. sexaurelia; transition/transversion ratio 1.67) per nucleotide site per cell division, not significantly different from the previously reported P. tetraurelia mutation rate (Table 1). Most base substitutions are widely distributed across the whole genome on different scaffolds (Supplemental Table S2). 40% and 50% of all coding-region base substitutions are detected at the second position of codons for P. sexaurelia and P. biaurelia respectively (Supplemental Table S2). The base-pair substitutions are heavily biased in the A/T direction in all three species (Table 1; Figure 1). No significant difference for any specific type of mutations among the three species could be detected, neither does the mutation bias, which could result from the low statistical power of the small number of mutations in each species (Figure 1; Table 1). The limited number of mutations—even after 2–4 years of frequent single-cell bottlenecks—illustrate the difficulty of mutation-accumulation experiments using ciliates cultured in liquid medium. Automatic transferring operation is needed to finally resolve the mutation spectra of ciliates (currently, no ciliate species’ mutation spectrum has been resolved).
Table 1

G/C composition and mutation parameters of the three Paramecium species. CI: confidence intervals; G/C: genome-wide G/C composition, SE is binomial standard error; m, mutation bias in the G/C direction (calculaiton details are in the Materials and Methods section); p4: G/C content at fourfold degenerate sites; p: equilibrium neutral expectation for G/C content by mutation pressure alone; S, population-scaled selection strength for G/C nucleotides at fourfold degenerate sites; µ, mutation rate × 10−11 per nucleotide site per cell division

SpeciesG/C (SE)mpnp4Sµ (95% CI)
P. biaurelia0.25 (4.94×10−5)0.05 (2.58×10−2)0.060.201.372.44 (1.63, 3.50)
P. sexaurelia0.24 (5.18×10−5)0.04 (2.88×10−2)0.030.141.892.42 (1.55, 3.61)
P. tetraurelia0.28 (5.29×10−5)0.08 (2.93×10−2)0.070.241.261.94 (1.32, 2.84)
Figure 1

Mutation spectra of the three Paramecium species. Error bars are 95% Poisson confidence intervals.

Mutation spectra of the three Paramecium species. Error bars are 95% Poisson confidence intervals. Despite the high species diversity of ciliates, very little research has directly addressed ciliate mutational processes (Sung ; Long ; Long ). Here we successfully accumulated dozens of base-pair substitutions in P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia, supporting the conclusion that ciliates in general have extremely low germline base-substitution mutation rates (Sung ; Long ). The consistently low germline mutation rates may be a consequence of the large effective population sizes of ciliates, which enhance the efficiency of selection for replication fidelity (Lynch ), and/or the dimorphic nuclear structure, which expands the temporal period during which mutations are sequestered in a silent state within the germline (Sung ). The species in this study are known to have quite different πs (the mean pair-wise nucleotide divergence between sequences in a population sample at fourfold degenerate sites, where any codon change will not change the coded amino acid; Table 1 in (Johri ))(Table 3 in Catania ): 0.0089, 0.0269, 0.0058 for P. biaurelia, P. sexaurelia, and P. tetraurelia respectively. Yet their mutation rates (µ) are quite similar, as discovered in this study. Since πs = 4N×µ, where N is the effective population size (Nei and Li 1979), this implies that these species may have different effective population sizes. As mentioned above, none of the three species’ mutation spectra were resolved. This hinders the attempts to explore the role of mutation bias in shaping the different genome G/C nucleotide compositions, as we have done in a wide variety of organisms with mutation spectra completely resolved (Long ). Nonetheless, with the current mutation bias data of the three species, we calculated the equilibrium G/C contents and found that they are correlated with the observed G/C content, but not significant (r = 0.85, P > 0.05; Table 1). The lack of significance could be caused by only three data points or again the small number of mutations accumulated. Consistent with Long , we also found universal selective strength/gene conversion favoring high G/C content using the fourfold degenerate sites and equilibrium G/C content (equation 2 in Long ) (Table 1). These findings thus confirm that the genome composition of ciliate species is also under heavy influence of mutations, though a complete mutation spectrum is needed to conclude on this.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Large-scale genome remodelling by the developmentally programmed elimination of germ line sequences in the ciliate Paramecium.

Authors:  Mireille Bétermier
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity.

Authors:  Jessica L Green; Andrew J Holmes; Mark Westoby; Ian Oliver; David Briscoe; Mark Dangerfield; Michael Gillings; Andrew J Beattie
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genome diversity in microbial eukaryotes.

Authors:  Casey L McGrath; Laura A Katz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Extraordinary genome stability in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia.

Authors:  Way Sung; Abraham E Tucker; Thomas G Doak; Eunjin Choi; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic diversity in the Paramecium aurelia species complex.

Authors:  Francesco Catania; François Wurmser; Alexey A Potekhin; Ewa Przybos; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Extreme mutation bias and high AT content in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  William L Hamilton; Antoine Claessens; Thomas D Otto; Mihir Kekre; Rick M Fairhurst; Julian C Rayner; Dominic Kwiatkowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration.

Authors:  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; James T Robinson; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.622

8.  How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean?

Authors:  Camilo Mora; Derek P Tittensor; Sina Adl; Alastair G B Simpson; Boris Worm
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Extensive de novo mutation rate variation between individuals and across the genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Rob W Ness; Andrew D Morgan; Radhakrishnan B Vasanthakrishnan; Nick Colegrave; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Evolutionary determinants of genome-wide nucleotide composition.

Authors:  Hongan Long; Way Sung; Sibel Kucukyildirim; Emily Williams; Samuel F Miller; Wanfeng Guo; Caitlyn Patterson; Colin Gregory; Chloe Strauss; Casey Stone; Cécile Berne; David Kysela; William R Shoemaker; Mario E Muscarella; Haiwei Luo; Jay T Lennon; Yves V Brun; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 15.460

View more
  9 in total

1.  Population Genetics of Paramecium Mitochondrial Genomes: Recombination, Mutation Spectrum, and Efficacy of Selection.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Georgi K Marinov; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.416

2.  First Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Diatoms.

Authors:  Marc Krasovec; Sophie Sanchez-Brosseau; Gwenael Piganeau
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

3.  Evolution of Mutation Rate in Astronomically Large Phytoplankton Populations.

Authors:  Marc Krasovec; Rosalind E M Rickaby; Dmitry A Filatov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  The insect-killing bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens has the lowest mutation rate among bacteria.

Authors:  Jiao Pan; Emily Williams; Way Sung; Michael Lynch; Hongan Long
Journal:  Mar Life Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  One Cell, Two Gears: Extensive Somatic Genome Plasticity Accompanies High Germline Genome Stability in Paramecium.

Authors:  Francesco Catania; Rebecca Rothering; Valerio Vitali
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  A Population-Genetic Lens into the Process of Gene Loss Following Whole-Genome Duplication.

Authors:  Parul Johri; Jean-Francois Gout; Thomas G Doak; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 8.800

7.  Low Base-Substitution Mutation Rate but High Rate of Slippage Mutations in the Sequence Repeat-Rich Genome of Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Sibel Kucukyildirim; Megan Behringer; Way Sung; Debra A Brock; Thomas G Doak; Hatice Mergen; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann; Michael Lynch
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Current Affairs of Microbial Genome-Wide Association Studies: Approaches, Bottlenecks and Analytical Pitfalls.

Authors:  James Emmanuel San; Shakuntala Baichoo; Aquillah Kanzi; Yumna Moosa; Richard Lessells; Vagner Fonseca; John Mogaka; Robert Power; Tulio de Oliveira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Cross-Generational Effects and Non-random Developmental Response to Temperature Variation in Paramecium.

Authors:  Rebecca Hagen; Valerio Vitali; Francesco Catania
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.