Literature DB >> 29793597

Perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

L Wang1, Y Chang2, S A Kennedy3, P J Hong4, N Chow5, R J Couban6, R E McCabe7, P J Bieling7, J W Busse8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent post-surgical pain affects 10-80% of individuals after common operations, and is more common among patients with psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, or catastrophising.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative psychotherapy for persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment. Paired independent reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence.
RESULTS: Our search of five electronic databases, up to September 1, 2016, found 15 trials (2220 patients) that were eligible for review. For both persistent post-surgical pain and physical impairment, perioperative education was ineffective, while active psychotherapy suggested a benefit (test of interaction P=0.01 for both outcomes). Moderate quality evidence showed that active perioperative psychotherapy (cognitive-behaviour therapy, relaxation therapy, or both) significantly reduced persistent post-surgical pain [weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.06 cm on a 10 cm visual analogue scale for pain, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.56 to -0.55 cm; risk difference (RD) for achieving no more than mild pain (≤3 cm) 14%, 95% CI 8-21%] and physical impairment [WMD -9.87% on the 0-100% Oswestry Disability Index, 95% CI -13.42 to -6.32%, RD for achieving no more than mild disability (≤20%) 21%, 95% CI 13-29%].
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy and relaxation therapy are effective for reducing persistent pain and physical impairment after surgery. Future studies should explore targeted psychotherapy for surgical patients at higher risk for poor outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42016047335.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; meta-analysis; postoperative pain; psychotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29793597     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  NGF-Induced Nav1.7 Upregulation Contributes to Chronic Post-surgical Pain by Activating SGK1-Dependent Nedd4-2 Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Bao-Wen Liu; Jin Zhang; Yi-Shun Hong; Ning-Bo Li; Yi Liu; Mi Zhang; Wen-Yao Wu; Hua Zheng; Angelika Lampert; Xian-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Trans-auricular vagus nerve stimulation to reduce perioperative pain and morbidity: protocol for a single-blind analyser-masked randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amour B U Patel; Phillip P W M Bibawy; Zehra Majeed; Weng Liang Gan; Gareth L Ackland
Journal:  BJA Open       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce persistent postsurgical pain following internal fixation of extremity fractures (COPE): Rationale for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matilda E Nowakowski; Randi E McCabe; Jason W Busse
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2019-07-30

4.  Determining the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in improving quality of life in patients undergoing endometriosis surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Zoë Boersen; Joukje Oosterman; Esther Gerdien Hameleers; Heidi Sabine Mathilde Jeanne Delcliseur; Cobie Lutters; Alicia IJssel de Schepper; Didi Braat; Christianne M Verhaak; Annemiek Nap
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Virtual reality and hypnosis for anxiety and pain management in intensive care units: A prospective randomised trial among cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Floriane Rousseaux; Nadia Dardenne; Paul B Massion; Didier Ledoux; Aminata Bicego; Anne-Françoise Donneau; Marie-Elisabeth Faymonville; Anne-Sophie Nyssen; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Transforming Standard of Care for Spine Surgery: Integration of an Online Single-Session Behavioral Pain Management Class for Perioperative Optimization.

Authors:  Sara A Davin; Jason Savage; Nicholas R Thompson; Andrew Schuster; Beth D Darnall
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-02

7.  A single-session acceptance and commitment therapy intervention among women undergoing surgery for breast cancer: A randomized pilot trial to reduce persistent postsurgical pain.

Authors:  Katherine Hadlandsmyth; Lilian N Dindo; Roohina Wajid; Sonia L Sugg; M Bridget Zimmerman; Barbara A Rakel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Pediatric Pain Screening Tool: A Simple 9-Item Questionnaire Predicts Functional and Chronic Postsurgical Pain Outcomes After Major Musculoskeletal Surgeries.

Authors:  Suryakumar Narayanasamy; Fang Yang; Lili Ding; Kristie Geisler; Susan Glynn; Arjunan Ganesh; Madhankumar Sathyamoorthy; Victor Garcia; Peter Sturm; Vidya Chidambaran
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  The Impact of Preoperative Distress: A Qualitative analysis of the Perioperative Pain Self-Management Intervention.

Authors:  Kenda Stewart Steffensmeier; Jennifer Van Tiem; Ashlie Obrecht; Mandy Conrad; Mark W Vander Weg; Katherine Hadlandsmyth
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Effect of perioperative cognitive behavioural therapy on chronic post-surgical pain among breast cancer patients with high pain catastrophising characteristics: protocol for a double-blinded randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aneurin Moorthy; Damien Lowry; Carla Edgley; Maire-Brid Casey; Donal Buggy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.