| Literature DB >> 29793543 |
Mahama Saaka1, Fusena Ali2, Felicia Vuu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There was less than satisfactory progress, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, towards child and maternal mortality targets of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5. The main aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and determinants of essential new newborn care practices in the Lawra District of Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Essential newborn care; Lawra District; Neonate feeding; Newborn danger signs; Optimal thermal care; Safe cord care
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29793543 PMCID: PMC5968597 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1145-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Socio-demographic and reproductive characteristics of respondents (N = 418)
| Age category | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Under 20 years | 14 (3.3) |
| 20–34 years | 349 (83.5) |
| At least 35 years | 55 (13.2) |
| Religion | |
| Christianity | 239 (57.2) |
| Islam | 179 (42.8) |
| Marital Status | |
| Married | 333 (79.7) |
| Single | 81 (19.4) |
| Divorced | 1 (0.2) |
| Widowed | 3 (0.7) |
| Educational Level | |
| None | 29 (6.9) |
| Primary | 54 (12.9) |
| JHS | 113 (27.0) |
| SHS/Vocational/Technical | 147 (35.2) |
| Tertiary | 75 (17.90 |
| Occupational Level | |
| Unemployed | 69 (16.5) |
| Petty trader | 182 (43.5) |
| Farmer | 18 (4.3) |
| Civil / Public Servant | 50 (12.0) |
| Others | 99 (23.7) |
| Maternal Knowledge of dangers of newborn care signs | |
| 1–3 | 229 (54.8) |
| At least 4 | 189 (45.2) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Gravidity | |
| Primigravidae | 166 (39.7) |
| Secundigravidae | 132 (31.6) |
| Multigravidae | 120 (28.7) |
| Parity | |
| Primiparous | 211 (50.5) |
| Secundiparous | 111 (26.6) |
| Multiparous | 96 (23.0) |
| Timing of first ANC visit | |
| First trimester | 372 (89.0) |
| Second trimester | 41 (9.8) |
| Third trimester | 5 (1.2) |
Newborn Care Practices (N = 418)
| New born care practice | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Instrument used to cut the umbilical cord | |
| New blade | 48 (11.5) |
| Any available blade | 5 (1.2) |
| Scissors | 357 (85.4) |
| Others | 8 (1.9) |
| Total | 418 (100) |
| Material used to clamp tie cord | |
| Thread | 18 (4.3) |
| Cord tie | 14 (3.3) |
| Cord clamp | 385 (92.1) |
| Others | 1 (0.2) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| What was applied to cord | |
| Nothing | 12 (2.9) |
| Shea butter | 252 (60.3) |
| Spirit | 147 (35.2) |
| Shea butter with powder | 3 (0.7) |
| String | 1 (0.2) |
| Others | 3 (0.7) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Time baby was wrapped | |
| Immediately (< 5 min) | 215 (51.4) |
| 5–10 min | 155 (37.1) |
| 30–60 min | 12 (2.9) |
| Unknown | 36 (8.6) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Timing of newborn’s first bath | |
| Soon after birth | 29 (6.9) |
| 1–6 h | 166 (39.7) |
| More than 6 h but less than 24 h | 148 (35.4) |
| More than 24 h | 4 (1.0) |
| Can’t tell | 71 (17.0) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Reasons for applying substances to the cord stump | |
| Prevent infection | 109 (26.1) |
| To aid healing | 281 (67.2) |
| Keep it dry | 4 (1.0) |
| Prevent water from entering the stomach | 8 (1.9) |
| Midwifes advised me to used | 8 (1.9) |
| Not Applicable | 8 (1.9) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
Composite measures of newborn care practices
| New born care practice | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Safe cord care | |
| No | 264 (63.2) |
| Yes | 154 (36.8) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Optimal thermal care | |
| No | 272 (65.1) |
| Yes | 146 (34.9) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Good neonatal feeding | |
| No | 110 (26.3) |
| Yes | 308 (73.7) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
| Adequate total neonatal care | |
| No | 352 (84.2) |
| Yes | 66 (15.8) |
| Total | 418 (100.0) |
Predictors of good cord care (Bivariate analysis)
| Good cord care? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable |
| No | Yes | Test statistic |
| Age (years) | ||||
| Under 20 years | 14 | 5 (35.7) | 9 (64.3) | Chi-square ( |
| 20–34 years | 349 | 215 (61.6) | 134 (38.4) | |
| At least 35 years | 55 | 44 (80.0) | 11 (20.0) | |
| Adequacy of ANC attendance | ||||
| No | 46 | 41 (89.1) | 5 (10.9) | Chi-square ( |
| Yes | 372 | 223 (59.9) | 149 (40.1) | |
| Knowledge of dangers of newborn care signs | ||||
| 1–3 | 229 | 156 (68.1) | 73 (31.9) | Chi-square (χ2) = 5.4, |
| At least 4 | 189 | 108 (57.1) | 81 (42.9) | |
| Mothers’ education | ||||
| None | 29 | 25 (86.2) | 4 (13.8) | Chi-square (χ2) = 14.0, |
| Low | 167 | 115 (68.9) | 52 (31.1) | |
| High | 222 | 124 (55.9) | 98 (44.1) | |
Relationship between optimal thermal care and socio-demographic/antenatal care factors (N = 418)
| Optimal thermal care? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable |
| No | Yes | Test statistic |
| Age (years) | ||||
| Under 20 years | 14 | 10 (64.3 | 5 (35.7) | Chi-square ( |
| 20–34 years | 349 | 216 (61.9) | 133 (38.1) | |
| At least 35 years | 55 | 46 (83.6) | 9 (16.4) | |
| Total | ||||
| Mothers education | ||||
| None | 29 | 24 (82.8) | 5 (17.2) | Chi-square (χ2) = 45.4, |
| Low | 167 | 131 (78.4) | 36 (21.6) | |
| High | 222 | 113 (50.9) | 109 (49.1) | |
| Religion of mother | ||||
| Christianity | 239 | 167 (69.9) | 72 (30.1) | |
| Islam | 179 | 105 (58.7) | 74 (41.3) | |
| Knowledge of newborn danger signs | ||||
| 1–3 | 229 | 165 (72.1) | 64 (27.9) | |
| At least 4 | 189 | 107 (56.6) | 82 (43.4) | |
| Adequacy of ANC attendance | ||||
| No | 46 | 41 (89.1) | 5 (10.9) | Chi-square (χ2) = 13.2, |
| Yes | 372 | 231 (62.1) | 141 (37.9) | |
Relationship between good neonatal feeding and socio-demographic/antenatal care factors (N = 418)
| Good neonatal feeding? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | N | No | Yes | Test statistic |
| Age (years) | ||||
| Under 20 years | 14 | 5 (35.7) | 9 (64.3) | Chi-square ( |
| 20–34 years | 349 | 85 (24.4) | 264 (75.6) | |
| At least 35 years | 55 | 22 (40.0) | 33 (60.0) | |
| Adequacy of ANC attendance | ||||
| No | 46 | 19 (41.3) | 27 (58.7) | Chi-square (χ2) = 5.9, |
| Yes | 376 | 91 (24.5) | 281 (75.5) | |
| Mothers’ education | ||||
| None | 29 | 10 (34.5) | 19 (65.5) | |
| Low | 167 | 52 (31.1) | 115 (68.9) | |
| High | 222 | 48 (21.6) | 174 (78.4) | |
| Knowledge of newborn danger signs | ||||
| 1–3 | 229 | 74 (32.3) | 155 (67.7) | |
| At least 4 | 189 | 36 (19.0) | 153 (81.0) | |
Determinants of safe cord care, optimal thermal care and good neonatal feeding
| Variable | AOR (95% CI) safe cord care | AOR (95% CI) optimal thermal care | AOR (95% CI) good neonatal feeding | AOR (95% CI) aOverall adequacy of new born care practices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Age (years) | ||||
| ≥ 35 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Under 20 years | 6.57 (1.71, 25.31)** | 3.65 (0.79, 16.86) | 2.22 (0.55, 9.0) | 7.41 (0.85, 64.91) |
| 20–34 years | 2.01 (0.98, 4.12) | 3.28 (1.34, 8.04) ** | 2.02 (1.11, 3.70)* | 7.31 (1.65, 32.44)** |
| Adequacy of ANC attendance | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Yes | 4.04 (1.53, 10.66)** | 2.74 (1.01, 7.55) | 1.90 (1.01, 3.61)* | Not significant |
| Place of delivery | ||||
| Home | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Health facility | 5.60 (1.19, 26.30)** | Not significant | Not significant in final model | Not significant in final model |
| Mother could recall at least 4 new born danger signs? | ||||
| 1–3 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| At least 4 | Not significant in final model | Not significant | 2.00 (1.26, 3.17) ** | 2.51 (1.41, 4.47)** |
| Maternal Educational level | ||||
| No education | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Low (Primary to JHS) | Not significant in final model | 6.76 (0.85, 53.89) | Not significant in final model | Not significant in final model |
| High (At least SHS) | Not significant in final model | 20.54 (2.60, 162.12)** | Not significant in final model | Not significant in final model |
| Type of religion | ||||
| Christianity | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Islam | Not significant in final model | 1.72 (1.09, 2.72)* | Not significant in final model | Not significant |
| Parity | ||||
| Primiparous | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Secundiparous | Not significant | 1.19 (0.70, 2.02) | Not significant | 2.05 (1.08, 3.89)* |
| Multiparous | Not significant | 2.67 (1.41, 5.05)** | Not significant | 2.04 (0.97, 4.30) |
AOR (95% CI): Adjusted odds ratio at 95% confidence level
*significant at p < 0.05; **significant at p < 0.01; ***significant at p < 0.001
aOverall adequacy of new born care practices was defined to comprise safe cord care, optimal thermal care and good neonatal feeding