Woo Seok Choi1,2, Joowoong Park1, Jin Young Brian Choi3, Jae-Suk Yang1. 1. 1 Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 2. 2 Keyu Internal Medicine Clinic, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 3. 3 Emory University, Georgia, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sufficient infrastructure for information and communications technology (ICT) and a well-established policy are necessary factors for smooth implementation of telemedicine. However, despite these necessary conditions being met, there are situations where telemedicine still fails to be accepted as a system due to the low receptivity of stakeholders. In this study, we analyse stakeholders' resistance to an organization's implementation of telemedicine. Focusing on the physicians' interests, we propose a strategy to minimize conflicts and improve acceptance. METHODS: The Delphi study involved 190 telemedicine professionals who were recommended by 485 telemedicine-related personnel in South Korea. RESULTS: Out of 190 professionals, 60% of enrolled participants completed the final questionnaires. The stakeholders were categorized into four groups: policy-making officials, physicians, patients, and industrialists. Among these, the physicians were most opposed to the adoption of telemedicine. The main causes of such opposition were found to be the lack of a medical services delivery system and the threat of disruption for primary care clinics. Very little consensus was observed among the stakeholders, except on the following points: the need for expansion of the national health insurance budget by the government, and the need for enhancement of physicians' professional autonomy to facilitate smooth agreements. DISCUSSION: Our analysis on the causes of the resistance to telemedicine, carried out with the groups mentioned above, has important implications for policy-makers deriving strategies to achieve an appropriate consensus.
INTRODUCTION: Sufficient infrastructure for information and communications technology (ICT) and a well-established policy are necessary factors for smooth implementation of telemedicine. However, despite these necessary conditions being met, there are situations where telemedicine still fails to be accepted as a system due to the low receptivity of stakeholders. In this study, we analyse stakeholders' resistance to an organization's implementation of telemedicine. Focusing on the physicians' interests, we propose a strategy to minimize conflicts and improve acceptance. METHODS: The Delphi study involved 190 telemedicine professionals who were recommended by 485 telemedicine-related personnel in South Korea. RESULTS: Out of 190 professionals, 60% of enrolled participants completed the final questionnaires. The stakeholders were categorized into four groups: policy-making officials, physicians, patients, and industrialists. Among these, the physicians were most opposed to the adoption of telemedicine. The main causes of such opposition were found to be the lack of a medical services delivery system and the threat of disruption for primary care clinics. Very little consensus was observed among the stakeholders, except on the following points: the need for expansion of the national health insurance budget by the government, and the need for enhancement of physicians' professional autonomy to facilitate smooth agreements. DISCUSSION: Our analysis on the causes of the resistance to telemedicine, carried out with the groups mentioned above, has important implications for policy-makers deriving strategies to achieve an appropriate consensus.
Authors: Stephanie J Fonda; Sven-Erik Bursell; Drew G Lewis; Dawn Clary; Dara Shahon; Mark B Horton Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Anna V Silven; Annelieke H J Petrus; María Villalobos-Quesada; Ebru Dirikgil; Carlijn R Oerlemans; Cyril P Landstra; Hileen Boosman; Hendrikus J A van Os; Marco H Blanker; Roderick W Treskes; Tobias N Bonten; Niels H Chavannes; Douwe E Atsma; Y K Onno Teng Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Björn Schreiweis; Monika Pobiruchin; Veronika Strotbaum; Julian Suleder; Martin Wiesner; Björn Bergh Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Francesc Saigí-Rubió; Josep Vidal-Alaball; Joan Torrent-Sellens; Ana Jiménez-Zarco; Francesc López Segui; Marta Carrasco Hernandez; Xavier Alzaga Reig; Josep Maria Bonet Simó; Mercedes Abizanda González; Jordi Piera-Jimenez; Oscar Solans Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 5.428