Literature DB >> 29791924

Return to Sport after ACL Surgery: A Comparison between Two Different Reconstructive Techniques.

Matteo Baldassarri1, Luca Perazzo1, Diego Ghinelli2, Marco Ricciarelli1, Federico Pilla1, Roberto Buda1.   

Abstract

The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has become a very common surgical procedure. One of the main success indicators of the surgical procedure is the return to preinjury sporting level. In recent years, reconstructive techniques have been geared toward less morbidity and optimized ligaments process to speed up the recovery of sports activity. This study compares clinical and imaging data, to evaluate the timing of return to sport, of two populations undergoing ACLR using two different techniques: ACLR with hamstring maintaining tibial insertion (MHG) and an all-inside technique with complete hamstring detachment (DHG). Patients were clinically evaluated with Marx rating scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Tegner activity scale at a minimum follow-up (FU) of 4 years. The two groups have homogeneous characteristics: age, sex, type, and level of sports activity. Since November 2012, 59 patients with unilateral ACL insufficiency underwent ACLR: 31 patients using the MHG technique and 28 patients using the DHG technique. In both groups, a significant improvement in the clinical scores of the administered tests was observed. The MHG group reported a higher percentage of normal knees (83.8%) compared with the DHG group (78.6%). IKDC subjective score improved at each FU. Comparing the two techniques, at 12 months' FU the MHG group achieved better IKDC results (89.6) compared with the DHG technique (84.2). Marx and Tegner score values improved over time reaching comparable results at final FU. At final FU, 98% of patients returned to the same preinjury professional sporting level. Both techniques have been able to provide good clinical results. The MHG group, however, had a resumption of sports activity of the same level and intensity slightly longer (6.3 months) than that in the DHG group (5.9 months). Furthermore, the resumption of training and athletic gestures for the type of sport practiced was earlier than the DHG group. However, in the long run the level of sporting activity leveled in both groups, demonstrating the effectiveness of both techniques. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29791924     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  2 in total

1.  Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Fu; Wei-Cheng Chen; Yung-Chang Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony C Mok; Andrew J Fancher; Matthew L Vopat; Jordan Baker; Armin Tarakemeh; Scott Mullen; John P Schroeppel; Kim Templeton; Mary K Mulcahey; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.