| Literature DB >> 29791682 |
Valter Paulo Neves Miranda1, Núbia Sousa de Morais1, Eliane Rodrigues de Faria1, Paulo Roberto Dos Santos Amorim1, João Carlos Bouzas Marins1, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini1, Paula Costa Teixeira2, Silvia Eloiza Priore1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of body image with physical activity level, body composition, and sedentary behavior (SB) of female adolescents.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29791682 PMCID: PMC6322812 DOI: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr ISSN: 0103-0582
Association between independent variables and body dissatisfaction rating as per the Body Shape Questionnaire.
| BSQ (%) | p-value | PR | 95%CI | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No dissatisfaction | Dissatisfaction | ||||||
| BMI (n=101) | |||||||
| Eutrophic/Low-weight | 59 (58.4) | 24 (23.8) | <0.001b** | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| Overweight/obese | 1 (1.0) | 17 (16.0) | 3.26 | 2.28 | 4.66 | ||
| BF% (n=97) | |||||||
| Adequate | 40 (41.2) | 13 (13.4) | <0.001a | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| Elevated | 16 (16.5) | 28 (28.9) | 2.59 | 1.53 | 4.38 | ||
| WC (n=98) | |||||||
| Adequate | 58 (59.2) | 32 (32.7) | 0.006 b* | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| Elevated | 1 (1.0) | 7 (7.1) | 2.46 | 1.67 | 3.61 | ||
| WHR (n=96) | |||||||
| Adequate | 56 (58.3) | 29 (30.2) | <0.001b** | 1 | 0.006 | ||
| Elevated | 1 (1.0) | 10 (10.4) | 2.66 | 1.87 | 3.78 | ||
| PAL (n=99) | |||||||
| Active/very active | 8 (8.1) | 8 (8.1) | 0.581 | 1 | 0.422 | ||
| Sedentary/low PAL | 50 (50.5) | 33 (33.3) | 0.79 | 0.45 | 1.38 | ||
| ST (2h) (n=99) | |||||||
| Adequate | 12 (12.1) | 2 (2.0) | 0.038 a* | 1 | 0.081 | ||
| Elevated | 46 (46.5) | 39 (39.4) | 3.21 | 0.86 | 11.90 | ||
| CT (2h) (n=98) | |||||||
| Adequate | 30 (30.6) | 11 (11.2) | 0.036 a* | 1 | 0.039 | ||
| Elevated | 29 (29.6) | 28 (28.6) | 1.83 | 1.03 | 3.24 | ||
aPearson’s chi-square test; Fisher’s Exact test; *p<0.05; **p<0.001; BSQ: body shape questionnaire; PR: prevalence ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; BF%: body fat percentage; WC: waist circumference; WHR: waist-to-height ratio; PAL: physical activity level; ST: screen time; CT: cell phone time.
Figure 1:Evaluation of body image by Body Shape Questionnaire in relation to measures of body composition.
Association between independent variables and body dissatisfaction rating as per the Body Silhouette Scale.
| Independent variables | Body Silhouette Scale Satisfaction | p-value | PR | 95%CI | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfied (%) | Dissatisfied (%) | ||||||
| BMI (n=113) | |||||||
| Eutrophic/low-weight | 55 (48.7) | 35 (31.0) | <0.001 | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| Overweight/obese | 5 (4.4) | 18 (15.9) | 2.01 | 1.43 | 2.82 | ||
| BF% (n=117) | |||||||
| Adequate | 39 (33.3) | 25 (21.4) | 0.096 | 1 | 0.90 | 2.01 | 0.139 |
| Elevated | 25 (21.4) | 28 (23.9) | 1.35 | ||||
| WC (n=104) | |||||||
| Adequate | 55 (52.9) | 39 (37.5) | 0.005 | 1 | 1.57 | 2.98 | <0.001 |
| Elevated | 1 (1.0) | 9 (8.7) | 2.17 | ||||
| WHR (n=103) | |||||||
| Adequate | 53 (51.5) | 37 (35.1) | 0.006 | 1 | 1.46 | 2.89 | <0.001 |
| Elevated | 2 (1.9) | 11 (10.7) | 2.05 | ||||
| PAL (n=120) | |||||||
| Active/very active | 5 (4.2) | 14 (11.7) | 0.011a | 1 | 0.38 | 0.78 | 0.001 |
| Sedentary/low PAL | 60 (50.0) | 41 (34.2) | 0.55 | ||||
| ST (2h) (n=117) | |||||||
| Adequate | 9 (7.7) | 9 (7.7) | 0.798 | 1 | 0.53 | 1.48 | 0.653 |
| Elevated | 55 (47.0) | 44 (37.6) | 0.88 | ||||
| CT (2h) (n=116) | |||||||
| Adequate | 28 (24.1) | 19 (16.4) | 0.453 | 1 | 0.77 | 1.81 | 0.441 |
| Elevated | 36 (31.0) | 33 (28.4) | 1.18 | ||||
aPearson’s chi-square test; Fisher’s Exact test; *p<0.05; **p<0.001; BSQ: body shape questionnaire; PR: prevalence ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; BF%: body fat percentage; WC: waist circumference; WHR: waist-to-height ratio; PAL: physical activity level; ST: screen time; CT: cell phone time.
Figure 2:Multiple correspondence analysis between BMI, BSQ, Distortion, PAL, Silhouette scale, and WHR.