| Literature DB >> 29791580 |
Giovani Luiz De Santi1, Henrique Turin Moreira1, Eduardo Elias Vieira de Carvalho1, Júlio César Crescêncio1, André Schmidt1, José Antônio Marin-Neto1, Lourenço Gallo-Júnior1.
Abstract
The study of myocardial contractility, based on the new anatomical concepts that govern cardiac mechanics, represents a promising strategy of analysis of myocardial adaptations related to physical training in the context of post-infarction. We investigated the influence of aerobic training on physical capacity and on the evaluation parameters of left ventricular contraction mechanics in patients with myocardial infarction. Thirty-one patients (55.1 ± 8.9 years) who had myocardial infarction in the anterior wall were prospectively investigated in three groups: interval training group (ITG) (n = 10), moderate training group (MTG) n = 10) and control group (CG) (n = 10). Before and after 12 weeks of clinical follow-up, patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The trained groups performed supervised aerobic training on treadmill, in two different intensities. A statistically significant increase in peak oxygen uptake (VO2) was observed in the ITG (19.2 ± 5.1 at 21.9 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min, p < 0.01) and in the MTG 18.8 ± 3.7 to 21.6 ± 4.5 ml/kg/min, p < 0.01). The GC did not present a statistically significant change in peak VO2. A statistically significant increase in radial strain (STRAD) was observed in the CG: basal STRAD (57.4 ± 16.6 to 84.1 ± 30.9%, p < 0.05), medial STRAD (57.8 ± 27, 9 to 74.3 ± 36.1%, p < 0.05) and apical STRAD (38.2 ± 26.0 to 52.4 ± 29.8%, p < 0.01). The trained groups did not present a statistically significant change of the radial strain. The present study points to a potential clinical application of the parameters of ventricular contraction mechanics analysis, especially radial strain, to discriminate post-infarction myocardial adaptations between patients submitted or not to aerobic training programs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29791580 PMCID: PMC5941964 DOI: 10.5935/abc.20180049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol ISSN: 0066-782X Impact factor: 2.000
Exercise Cardiopulmonary Test Variables
| CG (n = 10) | ITG (n = 10) | MTG (n = 10) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| VO2 peak (ml/kg/min) | 18,2 ± 4,4 | 17,1 ± 4,6 | 19,2 ± 5,1 | 21,9 ± 5,6 | 18,8 ± 3,7 | 21,6 ± 4,5 |
| VM peak (L/min) | 55,9 ± 17,5 | 48,4 ± 15,9[ | 61,4 ± 20,6 | 72,2 ± 21,9 | 62,1 ± 14,5 | 68,6 ± 15,5[ |
| Basal PO2 (ml/systole) | 4,3 ± 1,1 | 4,1 ± 0,8 | 3,75 ± 0,7 | 4,3 ± 0,9 | 4,5 ± 1,5 | 4,1 ± 1,0 |
| PO2 peak (ml/systole) | 11,7 ± 3,1 | 11,3 ± 3,1 | 11,6 ± 3,0 | 12,8 ± 2,5[ | 11,1 ± 1,1 | 12,3 ± 1,7[ |
| RER | 1,08 ± 0,08 | 1,08 ± 0,08 | 1,12 ± 0,11 | 1,19 ± 0,10 | 1,15 ± 0,07 | 1,19 ± 0,08 |
| HR rest (bpm) | 64,1 ± 12,8 | 65,6 ± 6,6 | 63,1 ± 9,9 | 62,1 ± 6,0 | 63,6 ± 11,6 | 64,8 ± 8,2 |
| HR peak (bpm) | 122,9 ± 28,3 | 123,1 ± 28,2 | 131,8 ± 20,6 | 133,2 ± 21,7 | 131,6 ± 12,3 | 129,0 ± 18,3 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 158,5 ± 22,4 | 159,5 ± 15,5 | 149,5 ± 25,2 | 146,5 ± 16,8 | 153,0 ± 20,1 | 145,2 ± 17,9 |
| DBP peak (mmHg) | 8,2 ± 0,6 | 8,4 ± 0,7 | 8,1 ± 0,6 | 8,0 ± 0,5 | 8,3 ± 0,7 | 8,1 ± 0,6 |
| DP (bpm.mmHg) | 19628 ± 5523 | 19422 ± 3870 | 19989 ± 5770 | 19596 ± 4468 | 20229 ± 3864 | 19566 ± 3990 |
VO2: oxygen uptake; VM: ventilation-minute; PO2: oxygen pulse; RER: respiratory exchange rate; HR: heart rate; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; DP: double product.
p < 0.01: different, in the comparative analysis before and after, after the period of clinical follow-up.
p < 0.05: different, before and after comparative analysis, after the clinical follow-up period.
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Variable
| CG (n = 10) | ITG (n = 10) | MTG (n = 10) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | |
| FDV (ml) | 156,6 ± 39,3 | 148,2 ± 34,1 | 174,8 ± 55,8 | 178,8 ± 44,9 | 143,8 ± 52,9 | 141,0 ± 45,5 |
| FSV (ml) | 91,6 ± 37,0 | 83,9 ± 38,3 | 96,3 ± 52,3 | 96,3 ± 36,3 | 82,6 ± 38,9 | 76,2 ± 36,5 |
| FE (%) | 43,9 ± 11,5 | 45,7 ± 14,4 | 47,0 ± 10,8 | 47,2 ± 6,8 | 44,6 ± 9,5 | 47,6 ± 10,4 |
| STLONG (%) | -9,0 ± 5,4 | -9,1 ± 6,2 | -9,2 ± 4,7 | -8,6 ± 4,6 | -10,1 ± 4,5 | -10,5 ± 4,5 |
| STCIRC_B (%) | -15,5 ± 4,3 | -17,8 ± 3,3 | -17,0 ± 3,3 | -17,2 ± 3,0 | -14,2 ± 4,6 | -14,9 ± 3,4 |
| STCIRC_M (%) | -13,5 ± 4,5 | -14,4 ± 3,6 | -13,5 ± 3,6 | -14,5 ± 3,5 | -12,0 ± 2,1 | -12,5 ± 2,4 |
| STCIRC_A (%) | -10,5 ± 4,6 | -12,2 ± 6,9 | -10,3 ± 5,6 | -11,5 ± 4,5 | -11,2 ± 4,4 | -12,5 ± 8,4 |
| STRAD_B (%) | 57,4 ± 16,6 | 84,1 ± 30,9[ | 63,3 ± 19,5 | 58,6 ± 18,8 | 67,9 ± 24,5 | 60,4 ± 25,5 |
| STRAD_M (%) | 57,8 ± 27,9 | 74,3 ± 36,1[ | 59,1 ± 21,3 | 58,5 ± 25,8 | 57,5 ± 21,0 | 55,6 ± 19,8 |
| STRAD_A (%) | 38,2 ± 26,0 | 52,4 ± 29,8 | 41,8 ± 25,0 | 41,4 ± 19,4 | 38,3 ± 25,8 | 38,9 ± 17,9 |
| ROT_B (°) | -2,2 ± 1,4 | -2,3 ± 0,9 | -1,6 ± 1,3 | -1,5 ± 1,1 | -1,9 ± 0,9 | -2,3 ± 1,2 |
| ROT_A (°) | 3,2 ± 1,7 | 4,0 ± 3,4 | 4,3 ± 2,4 | 4,0 ± 2,0 | 3,9 ± 1,7 | 3,5 ± 2,1 |
| TWIST (°) | 5,4 ± 2,1 | 6,3 ± 3,3 | 5,9 ± 2,8 | 5,5 ± 2,0 | 5,9 ± 1,5 | 5,9 ± 2,5 |
FDV: final diastolic volume; FSV: final systolic volume; EF: ejection fraction; STLONG: overall longitudinal strain; STCIRC_B: basal circumferential strain; STCIRC_M: medial circumferential strain; STCIRC_A: apical circumferential strain; STRAD_B: basal radial strain; STRAD_M: medial radial strain; STRAD_A: radial apical strain; ROT_B: basal rotation; ROT_A: apical rotation; Twist: angular difference between apical rotation and basal rotation.
p < 0.01: different, in the comparative analysis before and after, after the period of clinical follow-up.
p < 0.05: different, before and after comparative analysis, after the clinical follow-up period.