| Literature DB >> 29791528 |
Daniele Maria Pelissari1, Patricia Bartholomay1, Marina Gasino Jacobs1, Denise Arakaki-Sanchez1, Davllyn Santos Oliveira Dos Anjos2, Mara Lucia Dos Santos Costa2, Pauline Cristine da Silva Cavalcanti3, Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between the health services offered by primary care teams and the detection of new tuberculosis cases in Brazil. METHODS This was an ecological study covering all Brazilian municipalities that registered at least one new tuberculosis case (diagnosed between 2012 to 2014 and notified in the Information System of Notifiable Diseases) and with at least one primary care team evaluated by the second cycle of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ-AB). The variables of the PMAQ-AB were classified as proximal or distal, according to their relation with the tuberculosis diagnosis. Then, they were tested hierarchically in multiple models (adjusted by States) using negative binomial regression. RESULTS An increase of 10% in the primary health care coverage was associated with a decrease of 2.24% in the tuberculosis detection rate (95%CI -3.35- -1.11). Regarding the proximal variables in relation to diagnosis, in the multiple model, the detection of tuberculosis was associated with the proportion of teams that conduct contact investigation (increase in Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 2.97%, 95%CI 2.41-3.53), carry out tuberculosis active case finding (increase in IRR = 2.17%, 95%CI 1.48-2.87), and request culture for mycobacteria (increase in IRR = 1.87%, 95%CI 0.98-2.76). CONCLUSIONS The variables related to the search actions were positively associated with the detection of new tuberculosis cases, which suggests a significant contribution to the strengthening of the sensitivity of the surveillance system. On the other hand, primary care coverage was inversely associated with the tuberculosis detection rate, which could represent the overall effect of the primary care on transmission control, probably from the identification and early treatment of cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29791528 PMCID: PMC5953548 DOI: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2018052000131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Saude Publica ISSN: 0034-8910 Impact factor: 2.106
Descriptive analysis and association between distal variables and the detection rate of tuberculosisa. Brazil, 2012 to 2014.
| Distal variables (every 10%) | Median (IQR) | Increase in IRR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|
| % of coverage of primary care | 100 (83.1–100) | -1.88 (-2.87– -0.88) |
| % of teams with definition of the territory coverage | 100 (100–100) | 0.21 (-1.75–2.21) |
| % of teams with population not covered by the primary care in the territory | 10 (0–50) | 2.23 (1.58–2.88) |
| % of teams that conduct risk and vulnerability assessment in patients’ reception | 100 (87.5–100) | -0.65 (-1.71–0.41) |
| % of teams with an organized agenda for assistance of spontaneous demands | 100 (66.7–100) | 1.42 (0.6–2.25) |
| % of teams with free time in the agenda for follow-up appointments, if necessary, to clarify possible doubts and to evaluate patient's situation | 75 (50–100) | 0 (-0.7–0.69) |
| % of teams whose specialized appointment is scheduled by the health unit | 40 (0–90.9) | 1.64 (1.05–2.23) |
| % of teams that conduct focus groups on communicable diseases (dengue, tuberculosis, leprosy, HIV, trachoma) | 75 (50–100) | 0.52 (-0.14–1.19) |
| % of teams with a network support from health surveillance | 100 (80–100) | -0.1 (-0.92–0.74) |
| % of teams that have a registration of the number of TB cases identified in the last year | 100 (100–100) | 0.72 (-0.88–2.35) |
| % of teams that request HIV serology | 100 (100–100) | 2.8 (1.24–4.4) |
| % of teams that request rapid HIV testing | 87.1 (33.3–100) | 0.75 (0.11–1.38) |
| % of teams that request the rapid HIV testing or serology for HIV | 100 (100–100) | 2.44 (0.02–4.93) |
IQR: interquartile range; IRR: incidence rate ratio
The measure of association represents the increase in the incidence rate ratio (IRR-1) expressed as a percentage every 10% of the independent variable along with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All measures of association are adjusted by States.
With document that proves it.
Performed by the network of health services.
p < 0.05
Descriptive analysis and association of the proximal variables with the detection rate of tuberculosisa. Brazil, 2012 to 2014.
| Proximal variables (every 10%) | Median (IQR) | Increase in IRR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|
| % of teams that conduct TB active case finding | 70.6 (40–100) | 3.15 (2.46–3.84) |
| % of teams that request TB X-ray | 100 (100–100) | 2.43 (1.18–3.69) |
| % of teams that request smear microscopy for TB | 100 (100–100) | 3.8 (2.26–5.36) |
| % of teams that request culture for mycobacteria | 100 (71.4–100) | 2.36 (1.46–3.27) |
| % of teams that have the annual estimate of the number of TB cases and symptomatic respiratory cases in their territory | 93.8 (66.7–100) | 2.19 (1.4–2.99) |
| % of teams whose first sputum sample for diagnosis of TB is collected at the first visit | 50 (22.2–94.4) | 0.81 (0.15–1.46) |
| % of teams that have a registration of the number of TB cases identified in the last year | 100 (100–100) | 0.8 (-0.62–2.23) |
| % of teams that conduct household contact investigation of new TB cases | 100 (0–100) | 3.56 (3.02–4.11) |
IQR: interquartile range; IRR: incidence rate ratio; TB: tuberculosis
The measure of association represents the increase in the incidence rate ratio (IRR-1) expressed as a percentage every 10% of the independent variable along with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All measures of association are adjusted by States.
Performed by the network of health services.
With document that proves it.
p < 0.05
Association of the distal and proximal variables with the detection rate of tuberculosisa. Brazil, 2012 to 2014.
| Variable (every 10%) | Model 1 Adjusted increase in IRR (95%CI) | Model 2 Adjusted increase in IRR (95%CI) | Model 3 Adjusted increase in IRR (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| % of teams with population not covered by the primary care in the territory | 1.87 (1.2–2.54) | 1.69 (1.03–2.34) | |
| % of teams whose specialized appointment is scheduled by the health unit and the date is subsequently informed to the user | 1.53 (0.95–2.12) | 1.33 (0.76–1.91) | |
| % of coverage of primary care | -1.92 (-3.06– -0.76) | -2.24 (-3.35– -1.11) | |
| % of teams that request HIV serology | 2.37 (0.81–3.94) | ||
| % of teams with an organized agenda for assistance of the spontaneous demand | 1.32 (0.51–2.14) | ||
| % of teams that conduct household contact investigation of new TB cases | 3.04 (2.49–3.6) | 2.97 (2.41–3.53) | |
| % of teams that conduct TB active case finding | 2.07 (1.37–2.77) | 2.17 (1.48–2.87) | |
| % of teams that request smear microscopy for TB | 1.91 (0.33–3.52) | ||
| % of teams that request culture for mycobacteria | 1.61 (0.67–2.55) | 1.87 (0.98–2.76) | |
| 2Log likelihood | -28400.7 | -28280.0 | -28207.6 |
IRR: incidence rate ratio; TB: tuberculosis
2Log likelihood empty model = -31,217.83
The measure of association represents the increase in the incidence rate ratio (IRR-1) expressed as a percentage every 10% of the independent variable along with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All measures of association are adjusted by States and the other variables included in the corresponding model. All associations were statistically significant.
Performed by the network of health services.
Figure 1Tuberculosis (TB) detection rate according to the proportion of teams that conduct contact investigation and TB active case finding. Brazil, 2012 to 2014. (A) Household contacts investigation of new TB cases. (B) TB active case finding in the general population.
Figure 2Variables associated with the detection rate of tuberculosis (TB) according to Macroregions. Brazil, 2012 to 2014.