| Literature DB >> 29791031 |
Jasmin P Heiden1,2, Silke Thoms3, Kai Bischof2, Scarlett Trimborn1,2.
Abstract
Impacts of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations and increased daily irradiances from enhanced surface water stratification on phytoplankton physiology in the coastal Southern Ocean remain still unclear. Therefore, in the two Antarctic diatoms Fragilariopsis curta and Odontella weissflogii, the effects of moderate and high natural solar radiation combined with either ambient or future pCO2 on cellular particulate organic carbon (POC) contents and photophysiology were investigated. Results showed that increasing CO2 concentrations had greater impacts on diatom physiology than exposure to increasing solar radiation. Irrespective of the applied solar radiation regime, cellular POC quotas increased with future pCO2 in both diatoms. Lowered maximum quantum yields of photochemistry in PSII (Fv /Fm ) indicated a higher photosensitivity under these conditions, being counteracted by increased cellular concentrations of functional photosynthetic reaction centers. Overall, our results suggest that both bloom-forming Antarctic coastal diatoms might increase carbon contents under future pCO2 conditions despite reduced physiological fitness. This indicates a higher potential for primary productivity by the two diatom species with important implications for the CO2 sequestration potential of diatom communities in the future coastal Southern Ocean.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990COzzm3219902zzm321990; Southern Ocean; climate change; light; multiple stressors; photophysiology; photosensitivity; phytoplankton
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29791031 PMCID: PMC6120492 DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phycol ISSN: 0022-3646 Impact factor: 2.923
Partial pressures of CO2 (pCO2) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations were calculated from measured total alkalinity (TA), pH, silicate, phosphate, temperature, and salinity using the CO2Sys program (Pierrot et al. 2006). For all bubbled culture medium (without cells) and culture (with cells) bottles, pH (NBS scale) was measured every day over the whole duration of the experiment, whereas TA was measured only at the final day of the experiment. Values represent the means (±SD) of each respective parameter from all samplings over the course of the experiments
| Target pCO2 (μatm) | pCO2 (μatm) | TA (μmol · kg−1) | pH (NBS) | DIC (μmol · kg−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | Culture | Medium | Culture | Medium | Culture | Medium | Culture | |
| Current, 390 | 320 ± 4 | 325 ± 3 | 2,443 ± 50 | 2,464 ± 5 | 8.117 ± 0.005 | 8.114 ± 0.004 | 1,701 ± 3 | 1,709 ± 4 |
| Future, 800 | 760 ± 13 | 830 ± 8 | 2,447 ± 24 | 2,464 ± 5 | 7.773 ± 0.001 | 7.740 ± 0.003 | 1,818 ± 24 | 1,832 ± 5 |
Significant differences (level of significance P < 0.05) between treatments for all parameters were assessed using t‐tests and are indicated by + for light effects (MSR vs. HSR) and * for pCO2 effects (current vs. future)
| Parameter | Species | Light effect | Light effect | pCO2 effect | pCO2 effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Within current | Within future | Within MSR | Within HSR | ||
| POC |
| + | * | * | |
|
| + | * | * | ||
| PON |
| + | * | * | |
|
| + | * | * | ||
| C:N |
| * | |||
|
| * | ||||
| LHP |
| + | * | ||
|
| + | ||||
| LPP |
| + | * | ||
|
| + | * | |||
| LHP:LPP |
| + | + | ||
|
| + | * | |||
| Fv/Fm |
| * | * | ||
|
| * | * | |||
| ETRm |
| + | * | ||
|
| + | * | |||
| IK |
| + | * | * | |
|
| + | ||||
| α |
| ||||
|
| |||||
| σPSII |
| + | * | ||
|
| |||||
|
|
| * | |||
|
| * | * | |||
| τQA |
| ||||
|
| |||||
| [RCII]cell |
| ||||
|
| |||||
| (Chl |
| ||||
|
|
Figure 1Cellular quotas of particulate organic carbon (POC, pg · cell−1; A, B) and particulate organic nitrogen quotas (PON, pg · cell−1; C, D), as well as molar ratios of carbon to nitrogen (C:N, mol · mol−1; E, F) were determined for Fragilariopsis curta and Odontella weissflogii acclimated to different light (MSR, moderate solar radiation; HSR, high solar radiation) and pCO 2 (current = 390 μatm and future = 800 μatm) conditions. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by + for light effects and * for pCO 2 effects.
Cellular concentrations (in fg · cell−1) of light‐harvesting pigments (LHP: sum of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll c2, and fucoxanthin) and light‐protective pigments (LPP: sum of diadinoxanthin and diatoxanthin), as well as the ratio of cellular contents of light‐harvesting to light‐protective pigments (LHP:LPP) of Fragilariopsis and Odontella acclimated to different solar radiation (MSR, moderate solar radiation; HSR, high solar radiation) and pCO2 (current = 390 μatm and future = 800 μatm) conditions. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by + for light effects and * for pCO2 effects
| pCO2 | LHP | LPP | LHP:LPP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | Future | Current | Future | Current | Future | |
|
| ||||||
| MSR | 144 ± 27+ | 133 ± 5 | 4 ± 1 | 4 ± 1+ | 35 ± 4+ | 34 ± 6+ |
| HSR | 99 ± 5*,+ | 152 ± 12* | 5 ± 0* | 8 ± 1*,+ | 19 ± 2+ | 18 ± 1+ |
|
| ||||||
| MSR | 50,118 ± 4,292+ | 44,171 ± 7,538 | 1,264 ± 33*,+ | 1,979 ± 22* | 43 ± 11*,+ | 22 ± 1* |
| HSR | 40,123 ± 873+ | 39,900 ± 4,186 | 2,101 ± 38+ | 2,096 ± 55 | 19 ± 1+ | 19 ± 2 |
Figure 2Dark‐adapted maximum photosystem II quantum yield (Fv/Fm, dimensionless; A, B) were determined for Fragilariopsis curta and Odontella weissflogii acclimated to different light (MSR, moderate solar radiation; HSR, high solar radiation) and pCO 2 (current= 390 μatm and future= 800 μatm) conditions. Modeled Fv/Fm values are presented (dashed bars, A and B) for comparison with the measured Fv/Fm (filled bars). Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by + for light effects and * for pCO 2 effects.
Photosynthesis‐related parameters of Fragilariopsis curta and Odontella weissflogii acclimated to different solar radiation (MSR, moderate solar radiation; HSR, high solar radiation) and pCO2 (current = 390 μatm and future = 800 μatm) conditions were derived from irradiance‐dependent absETRs curve fits following Ralph and Gademann (2005). Given are maximum electron transport rate (ETRm, e− · PSII−1 · s−1), minimum saturating irradiance (IK, μmol photons · m−2 · s−1), and light‐use efficiency (α, rel. unit), the dark‐adapted functional absorption cross‐section of PSII (σPSII, nm2 per quanta), the connectivity factor (p, dimensionless) of adjacent PSII light‐harvesting pigment matrices, the dark‐adapted re‐oxidation of the electron acceptor QA (τQA, μs), the cellular concentration of functional PSII reaction centers ([RCII]cell, amol per cell), and the number of chlorophylls a and c2 per functional PSII reaction centers ((Chl a+c2):[RCII], mol · mol−1). Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences (P < 0.05) between treatments are indicated by + for light effects and * for pCO2 effects
| pCO2 | ETRm | IK | α | σPSII | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | Future | Current | Future | Current | Future | Current | Future | |
|
| ||||||||
| MSR | 175 ± 39+ | 211 ± 73 | 44 ± 8*,+ | 71 ± 7* | 4.1 ± 1.1 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 8.1 ± 0.7* | 6.5 ± 0.3*,+ |
| HSR | 391 ± 68*,+ | 237 ± 45* | 134 ± 25*,+ | 74 ± 10* | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 8.6 ± 0.6 | 8.2 ± 0.3+ |
|
| ||||||||
| MSR | 391 ± 77*,+ | 657 ± 143* | 166 ± 32+ | 245 ± 63 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.3 |
| HSR | 764 ± 147+ | 438 ± 420 | 297 ± 63+ | 175 ± 83 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 4.9 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 0.5 |
Figure 3: Exciton‐radical‐pair equilibrium model for the PSII core in the open (Q) and closed (Q ‐) state. k loss (Table 5) represents non‐photochemical losses from the antenna. The following rate constants are suggested for modeling of PSII (Trissl and Lavergne 1995, Kroon and Thoms 2006): = 540/ ns−1, exciton trapping by an open reaction center, depends on the antenna size (Table 5); k 2 = 2.3 ns−1, reduction of Q; = 0.3 ns−1, charge recombination in PSII units with open centers; = 0.001 ns−1, non‐radiative losses from the radical pair (Rox) in an open center; = 84.6/ ns−1, exciton trapping by a closed center, depends on the antenna size (Table 5); = 0.34 ns−1, charge recombination in PSII units with closed centers; = 0.99 ns−1, non‐radiative losses from the radical pair (Rred) in a closed center.
The number of Chl a and Chl c2 molecules in PSII (N II = Chl a+c2) were derived from the measured (Chl a+c2):[RCII] (Table 4) and an estimated proportion of total quanta absorbed by only PSII (F PSII in %; Suggett et al. 2004). The non‐photochemical deactivation rate k loss (in ns−1) of the PSI antenna is compared with the rate = 0.75 ns−1, which was measured for diatoms under dark‐adapted conditions (Miloslavina et al. 2009)
| pCO2 |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current | Future | Current | Future | Current | Future | |
|
| ||||||
| MSR | 50 | 849 | 539 | 1.00 | 3.00 | |
| HSR | 50 | 753 | 645 | 1.05 | 1.65 | |
|
| ||||||
| MSR | 50 | 724 | 383 | 1.60 | 9.00 | |
| HSR | 50 | 655 | 522 | 1.60 | 9.00 | |