AIMS: Accurately estimating kidney function is essential for the safe administration of renally cleared drugs such as ganciclovir. Current practice recommends adjusting renally eliminated drugs according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation. There are no data on the utility of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in ganciclovir dosing. To evaluate which renal function equation best predicts ganciclovir clearance. METHODS: The performance of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable 4-variable MDRD study (MDRD4-IDMS) equation and CKD-EPI equation in determining ganciclovir clearance were assessed retrospectively in patients treated with ganciclovir from 2004-2015. The MDRD4-IDMS and CKD-EPI equations adjusted to individual body surface area (MDRD4-IDMS·BSA and CKD-EPI·BSA, respectively) were also evaluated. Patients with intravenous ganciclovir peak and trough concentrations in their medical records were included in the study. Ganciclovir clearance was calculated from serum concentrations using a one-compartment model. The five equations were compared based on their predictive ability, the coefficient of determination, through a linear regression analysis. The results were validated in a group of patients. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. Seventy-four patients were analysed in the learning group and 26 in the validation group. The coefficient of determination was 0.281 for Cockcroft-Gault, 0.301 for CKD-EPI·BSA, 0.308 for MDRD4-IDMS·BSA, 0.324 for MDRD4-IDMS and 0.360 for CKD-EPI. Subgroup analysis also showed that CKD-EPI is a better predictor of ganciclovir clearance. Analysis of the validation group confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI equation correlates better with ganciclovir clearance than the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD4-IDMS equations, even the clinical difference between the equations is scarce.
AIMS: Accurately estimating kidney function is essential for the safe administration of renally cleared drugs such as ganciclovir. Current practice recommends adjusting renally eliminated drugs according to the Cockcroft-Gault equation. There are no data on the utility of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations in ganciclovir dosing. To evaluate which renal function equation best predicts ganciclovir clearance. METHODS: The performance of the Cockcroft-Gault equation, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable 4-variable MDRD study (MDRD4-IDMS) equation and CKD-EPI equation in determining ganciclovir clearance were assessed retrospectively in patients treated with ganciclovir from 2004-2015. The MDRD4-IDMS and CKD-EPI equations adjusted to individual body surface area (MDRD4-IDMS·BSA and CKD-EPI·BSA, respectively) were also evaluated. Patients with intravenous ganciclovir peak and trough concentrations in their medical records were included in the study. Ganciclovir clearance was calculated from serum concentrations using a one-compartment model. The five equations were compared based on their predictive ability, the coefficient of determination, through a linear regression analysis. The results were validated in a group of patients. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the final analysis. Seventy-four patients were analysed in the learning group and 26 in the validation group. The coefficient of determination was 0.281 for Cockcroft-Gault, 0.301 for CKD-EPI·BSA, 0.308 for MDRD4-IDMS·BSA, 0.324 for MDRD4-IDMS and 0.360 for CKD-EPI. Subgroup analysis also showed that CKD-EPI is a better predictor of ganciclovir clearance. Analysis of the validation group confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI equation correlates better with ganciclovir clearance than the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD4-IDMS equations, even the clinical difference between the equations is scarce.
Authors: Gary R Matzke; George R Aronoff; Arthur J Atkinson; William M Bennett; Brian S Decker; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Thomas Golper; Darren W Grabe; Bertram Kasiske; Frieder Keller; Jan T Kielstein; Ravindra Mehta; Bruce A Mueller; Deborah A Pasko; Franz Schaefer; Domenic A Sica; Lesley A Inker; Jason G Umans; Patrick Murray Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Thomas D Nolin; Michelle M Richardson; Harold I Feldman; Julia B Lewis; Roger Rodby; Raymond Townsend; Aghogho Okparavero; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Christopher H Schmid; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-05-17 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Philip Roland Selby; Sepehr Shakib; Sandra L Peake; Morgyn S Warner; David Yeung; Uwe Hahn; Jason A Roberts Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Patrick OʼByrne; Paul MacPherson; Lauren Orser; Jean Daniel Jacob; Dave Holmes Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2019 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Eliška Dvořáčková; Martin Šíma; Jakub Petrus; Eva Klapková; Petr Hubáček; Jiří Pozniak; Jan Havlín; Robert Lischke; Ondřej Slanař Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-02-13 Impact factor: 6.321