Literature DB >> 29790914

Females engage in stronger relationships: positive and negative effects of shrubs are more intense for Poa ligularis females than for males.

Pamela Graff1, Martin R Aguiar1, Rocio J Almeida1.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: Dioecious plants are of particular concern in view of global environmental changes because reproductive females are more sensitive to abiotic stresses, thus compromising population viability. Positive interactions with other plants may counteract the direct effects of any abiotic environmental stress, allowing them to thrive and maintain a viable population in suboptimal habitats, although this process has not been tested for dioecious species. Furthermore, almost no data are available on the outcome of such species interactions and their link with local spatial patterns and sex ratios.
Methods: We set up a field experiment with Poa ligularis, a dioecious native grass from the arid grasslands of South America. We studied the interaction of male and female plants with cushion shrubs of contrasting ecological strategies. We experimentally limited direct shrub-grass competition for soil moisture and transplanted plants to evaluate the amelioration of abiotic stress by shrub canopies (i.e. sun and wind) on grasses. We also studied the distribution of naturally established female and male plants to infer process-pattern relationships. Key
Results: Positive canopy effects as well as negative below-ground effects were more intense for females than for males. Deep-rooted Mulinum spinosum shrubs strongly facilitated survival, growth and reproduction of P. ligularis females. Naturally established female plants tended to distribute more closely to Mulinum than co-occurring males. Female growth suffered intensive negative root competition from the shallow-rooted Senecio filaginoides shrub. Conclusions: Interactions with other plants may reduce or enhance the effect of abiotic stresses on the seemingly maladapted sex to arid environments. We found that these biased interactions are evident in the current organization of sexes in the field, confirming our experimental findings. Therefore, indirect effects of climate change on population sex ratios may be expected if benefactor species abundances are differentially affected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29790914      PMCID: PMC6110346          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcy085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  28 in total

1.  Patch structure, dynamics and implications for the functioning of arid ecosystems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Shifts in positive and negative plant interactions along a grazing intensity gradient.

Authors:  Pamela Graff; Martín R Aguiar; Enrique J Chaneton
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Do species' strategies and type of stress predict net positive effects in an arid ecosystem?

Authors:  Pamela Graff; Martin R Aguiar
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Phenotypic variation in nurse traits and community feedbacks define an alpine community.

Authors:  Richard Michalet; Sa Xiao; Blaise Touzard; David S Smith; Lohengrin A Cavieres; Ragan M Callaway; Thomas G Whitham
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Do positive interactions increase with abiotic stress? A test from a semi-arid steppe.

Authors:  Fernando T Maestre; Jordi Cortina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Photoinhibition and drought in Mediterranean woody saplings: scaling effects and interactions in sun and shade phenotypes.

Authors:  Fernando Valladares; Iker Dobarro; David Sánchez-Gómez; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Is shade beneficial for mediterranean shrubs experiencing periods of extreme drought and late-winter frosts?

Authors:  Fernando Valladares; Joana Zaragoza-Castells; David Sánchez-Gómez; Silvia Matesanz; Beatriz Alonso; Angelika Portsmuth; Antonio Delgado; Owen K Atkin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations.

Authors:  David L Field; Melinda Pickup; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Plant response to climate change varies with topography, interactions with neighbors, and ecotype.

Authors:  Pierre Liancourt; Laura A Spence; Daniel S Song; Ariuntsetseg Lkhagva; Anarmaa Sharkhuu; Bazartseren Boldgiv; Brent R Helliker; Peter S Petraitis; Brenda B Casper
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  The effect of environmental heterogeneity on species richness depends on community position along the environmental gradient.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Xueqi Liu; Mohua Zhou; Dexiecuo Ai; Gang Wang; Youshi Wang; Chengjin Chu; Jeremy T Lundholm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.