Literature DB >> 29790393

Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit.

Malcolm MacLachlan1,2,3, David Banes4, Diane Bell5, Johan Borg6, Brian Donnelly7, Michael Fembek8, Ritu Ghosh9, Rosemary Joan Gowran10, Emma Hannay11, Diana Hiscock12, Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf13, Tracey Howe14, Friedbert Kohler15, Natasha Layton16, Siobhán Long17, Hasheem Mannan18, Gubela Mji2, Thomas Odera Ongolo19, Katherine Perry20, Cecilia Pettersson21, Jessica Power22, Vinicius Delgado Ramos23, Lenka Slepičková24, Emma M Smith25, Kiu Tay-Teo26, Priscille Geiser27, Hilary Hooks1.   

Abstract

Increased awareness, interest and use of assistive technology (AT) presents substantial opportunities for many citizens to become, or continue being, meaningful participants in society. However, there is a significant shortfall between the need for and provision of AT, and this is patterned by a range of social, demographic and structural factors. To seize the opportunity that assistive technology offers, regional, national and sub-national assistive technology policies are urgently required. This paper was developed for and through discussion at the Global Research, Innovation and Education on Assistive Technology (GREAT) Summit; organized under the auspices of the World Health Organization's Global Collaboration on Assistive Technology (GATE) program. It outlines some of the key principles that AT polices should address and recognizes that AT policy should be tailored to the realities of the contexts and resources available. AT policy should be developed as a part of the evolution of related policy across a number of different sectors and should have clear and direct links to AT as mediators and moderators for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. The consultation process, development and implementation of policy should be fully inclusive of AT users, and their representative organizations, be across the lifespan, and imbued with a strong systems-thinking ethos. Six barriers are identified which funnel and diminish access to AT and are addressed systematically within this paper. We illustrate an example of good practice through a case study of AT services in Norway, and we note the challenges experienced in less well-resourced settings. A number of economic factors relating to AT and economic arguments for promoting AT use are also discussed. To address policy-development the importance of active citizenship and advocacy, the need to find mechanisms to scale up good community practices to a higher level, and the importance of political engagement for the policy process, are highlighted. Policy should be evidence-informed and allowed for evidence-making; however, it is important to account for other factors within the given context in order for policy to be practical, authentic and actionable. Implications for Rehabilitation The development of policy in the area of asssitive technology is important to provide an overarching vision and outline resourcing priorities. This paper identifies some of the key themes that should be addressed when developing or revising assistive technology policy. Each country should establish a National Assistive Technology policy and develop a theory of change for its implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disability; accessibility; ageing; assistive technology; economics; impairment; policy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29790393     DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  14 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 2.  Intersections Between Systems Thinking and Market Shaping for Assistive Technology: The SMART (Systems-Market for Assistive and Related Technologies) Thinking Matrix.

Authors:  Malcolm MacLachlan; Joanne McVeigh; Michael Cooke; Delia Ferri; Catherine Holloway; Victoria Austin; Dena Javadi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  How Loan Bank of Assistive Technology Impacts on Life of Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Neuromuscular Diseases: A Collaborative Initiative.

Authors:  Thais Pousada; Jessica Garabal-Barbeira; Cristina Martínez; Betania Groba; Laura Nieto-Riveiro; Javier Pereira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: The Roles of Government and Civil Society in Fulfilling the Social Contract.

Authors:  Daniel Mont; Natasha Layton; Louise Puli; Shivani Gupta; Abner Manlapaz; Kylie Shae; Emma Tebbutt; Irene Calvo; Mahpekay Sidiqy; Kudakwashe Dube; Ulamila Kacilala
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again.

Authors:  Barbara Groot; Annyk Haveman; Mireille Buree; Ruud van Zuijlen; Juliette van Zuijlen; Tineke Abma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Katarina Baudin; Christine Gustafsson; Susanne Frennert
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Using concept mapping to develop a human rights based indicator framework to assess country efforts to strengthen rehabilitation provision and policy: the Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue framework (RESYST).

Authors:  Dimitrios Skempes; John Melvin; Per von Groote; Gerold Stucki; Jerome Bickenbach
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.185

8.  Implementation of the Assistive Product List (APL) in Malawi through development of appropriate policy and systems: an action research protocol.

Authors:  Ikenna D Ebuenyi; Emma M Smith; Juba Kafumba; Monica Z Jamali; Alister Munthali; Malcolm MacLachlan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Socio-Demographic Factors Influencing the Use of Assistive Technology among Children with Disabilities in Malawi.

Authors:  Monica Jamali-Phiri; Ikenna D Ebuenyi; Emma M Smith; Juba Alyce Kafumba; Malcolm MacLachlan; Alister Munthali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  More Than Just Assistive Devices: How a South African Social Enterprise Supports an Environment of Inclusion.

Authors:  Zara Trafford; Erna van der Westhuizen; Shona McDonald; Margi Linegar; Leslie Swartz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.