Literature DB >> 29790169

MET in gastric cancer with liver metastasis: The relationship between MET amplification and Met overexpression in primary stomach tumors and liver metastasis.

Han S Kim1,2, Hong J Chon3, Hyunki Kim4, Su-Jin Shin5, Volker Wacheck6, Aaron M Gruver7, Jong S Kim8, Sun Y Rha1,2, Hyun C Chung1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although MET amplification/overexpression was observed in a subset of gastric cancer (GC) patients, the relationship between MET amplification/overexpression in primary GC and liver metastasis was unclear.
METHODS: GC samples and matched liver metastases (N = 47) were analyzed by fluorescence/silver in-situ hybridization (FISH/SISH) and by immunohistochemistry for MET amplification and MET expression, respectively. MET-copy number (CN) and Met expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD, N = 356) were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Significant overlap existed between MET amplification and Met expression in both primary stomach tumors (P = 0.013) and liver metastasis (P = 0.001). In TCGA-STAD, MET-CN (≥4 copies) and MET expression were also positively correlated (r = 0.761; P = 0.017). Comparative analysis revealed a strong association between MET expression and MET amplification (85% concurrence) in primary stomach tumors and matched liver metastasis. MET status in synchronous liver metastasis (N = 36) was correlated with primary stomach tumors. However, a significant correlation between primary tumors and liver metastases was not observed in patients with metachronous liver metastasis. Survival analyses revealed that both MET amplification and MET overexpression were prognostic of poor outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: MET amplification and Met overexpression were positively correlated in GC. MET status should be re-evaluated in GC patients with liver metastasis, especially for metachronous metastasis.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Met; amplification; gastric cancer; liver metastasis; overexpression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29790169     DOI: 10.1002/jso.25097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zi-Ning Lei; Qiu-Xu Teng; Qin Tian; Wei Chen; Yuhao Xie; Kaiming Wu; Qianlin Zeng; Leli Zeng; Yihang Pan; Zhe-Sheng Chen; Yulong He
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-10-08

2.  MET as resistance factor for afatinib therapy and motility driver in gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Karolin Ebert; Julian Mattes; Thomas Kunzke; Gwen Zwingenberger; Birgit Luber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  TP53 mutation and MET amplification in circulating tumor DNA analysis predict disease progression in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jia Li; Zhaoyan Li; Yajie Ding; Yan Xu; Xiaohong Zhu; Nida Cao; Chen Huang; Mengmeng Qin; Feng Liu; Aiguang Zhao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Verticillin A inhibits colon cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting c-Met.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Liu; Xue-Li Zeng; Yue-Lin Guan; Jing-Xin Lu; Kai Tu; Fei-Yan Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Exosome-Delivered c-Met siRNA Could Reverse Chemoresistance to Cisplatin in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Qiumo Zhang; Haiyang Zhang; Tao Ning; Dongying Liu; Ting Deng; Rui Liu; Ming Bai; Kegan Zhu; Jialu Li; Qian Fan; Guoguang Ying; Yi Ba
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.