Literature DB >> 29789941

New variants of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus with large deletions in the spike protein, identified in the United States, 2016-2017.

Yunfang Su1,2, Yixuan Hou1, Melanie Prarat3, Yan Zhang4, Qiuhong Wang5.   

Abstract

Four types of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) variants with a large deletion in the spike protein were detected, together with the original US PEDV, from pig fecal and oral fluid samples collected during 2016-2017 in the US. Two of the variants are similar to those identified in Japan: one contains a 194-aa deletion, the same as PEDV variant TTR-2/JPN/2014, while the other contains a 204-aa deletion, the same as PEDV variant JKa-292/CS1de204. Two new S1 NTD-del PEDV variants were found: one contains a 201-aa deletion located at residues 30-230 and the other contains a 202-aa deletion located at residues 24-225 of the S protein. This is the first report on coinfection of S1 NTD-del PEDV variants and the original US PEDV strain in US pigs, indicating that PEDV continues to evolve in pigs and might be responsible for disease pattern changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29789941      PMCID: PMC7087112          DOI: 10.1007/s00705-018-3874-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Virol        ISSN: 0304-8608            Impact factor:   2.574


In spring 2013, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), an alphacoronavirus, emerged for the first time in the US, causing large-scale outbreaks in swine farms and the deaths of seven million pigs in the first year as well as severe economic losses [4]. Since summer 2014, the porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) disease pattern has been changing; while epidemics have decreased, sporadic outbreaks still occur and the virus is becoming more persistent at some farms. Two major types of PEDV, the original US [or non-S INDEL or North American (NA)] and S INDEL (G1b), are co-circulating in the US. By summer 2017, PEDV had been reported in 39 states. We detected the first S INDEL strain of PEDV in the US and isolated several original US and S INDEL PEDV strains and a unique variant in Vero cell cultures [6, 11]. The unique strain is the tissue culture-adapted (TC) PC177 strain that bears a 197-amino-acid (aa) deletion in the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the spike (S) protein. We designated it as a S1 NTD-del variant [2]. We did not detect any PEDV viral RNA harboring this deletion in the original field samples (or wild-type) of PC177 and concluded that the large deletion evolved during Vero cell culture [6]. Later, we developed new RT-PCR assays to differentiate the original US, S INDEL and S1 NTD-del PEDV variants [5]. We re-tested the original PC177 sample and screened dozens of PEDV-positive fecal samples previously tested positive by TaqMan real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) targeting the nucleocapsid (N) gene of PEDV [6]. Those samples were collected from PED outbreaks in Ohio during May 2013 and February 2014. We still did not detect an S1 NTD-del PEDV. In this study, we screened clinical pig samples from April 2014 to May 2017 and detected the S1 NTD-del PEDV variants in the US as early as December, 2016. Twenty-nine PEDV-positive pig fecal/intestine and oral fluid samples were provided by the Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory (ADDL) of the Ohio Department of Agriculture (Table 1). RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and PCR assays with primer sets F1 (5’-ATGGTACGTTGCTAGTGCGTA-3’) and UR (5’-TACCATGCACCATAGTGGAATCAT-3’), F2 (5’-TGGTGAAATCCAGAGTGTCAAT-3’) and UR, and F3 (5’-CCAGCTTATATGCAGGATGGAA-3’) and UR were performed to differentiate S1 NTD-del, original US and S INDEL PEDV as described previously (Table 1) [5]. TC-PC177, the original US PEDV TC-PC22A, and S INDEL PEDV TC-Iowa106 strains were used as positive controls [6]. Distilled water was used as a negative control.
Table 1

Detection of S1 NTD-del PEDVs from PEDV-positive pig fecal/oral fluid samples

Sample #Collected time (M/D/Y)NatureAge of pig(s)Clinical SignsPCR w/F1/UR (bp)aPCR w/F2/UR (bp)aPCR w/F3/UR (bp)aSequence analysisGenBank accession no.
PC2454/23/2014Feces<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-NDe
PC2465/14/2014Feces<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2471/8/2015Intestine<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2481/23/2015Intestine<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650~358ND
PC2491/23/2015Intestine<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2505/8/2015Rectal swab1-3 monthsYesf~ 880--Original USd
PC25111/2/2015Intestine<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2525/13/2016Oral fluid1-3 monthsNo~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2535/13/2016Feces1-3 monthsYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2544/27/2016Intestine<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2554/27/2016Rectal swab<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC25612/2/2016Feces<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC25712/2/2016Feces<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC25812/6/2016Oral FluidUnknownhYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC259/O12/8/2016Oral FluidUnknownhYesf~ 880;NDNDOriginal US;
PC259/D194Unknownh~ 302S1 NTD-DelMG490982
PC26012/29/2016Feces<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC261/Ob12/29/2016Feces3-8 monthsYesf~ 880;NDNDOriginal US;
PC261/D194b~ 302S1 NTD-DelMG837056
PC261/D201bMG837057
PC262/Ob1/19/2017Fecal Swab1-3 monthsYesf~ 880;NDNDOriginal US;MG490984
PC262/D194b~ 302S1 NTD-DelMG490983
PC26312/30/2016Oral fluid3-8 monthsMildg~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2641/20/2017Rectal swab<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2651/20/2017Rectal swab<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2661/27/2017Oral fluidUnknownhYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2672/10/2017Fecal swab<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2682/23/2017Fecal swab<1 monthYesf~ 880~ 650-ND
PC2692/31/17Feces3-8 monthsMildg~ 880--Original US d
PC2703/17/2017Oral fluid<1 monthYesf~ 880-~ 358S INDEL
PC2713/31/2017Oral fluid1-3 monthsYesf~ 880--Original US d
PC272/Oc5/13/2017Oral fluid<1 monthYesf~ 880;NDNDOriginal US;
PC272/D194c~ 302S1 NTD-DelMG490985
PC273/Oc5/31/2017Oral fluid<1 monthYesf~ 880;NDNDOriginal US;MG837058
PC273/D194c~ 302S1 NTD-DelMH000205
PC273/D202cMH000206
PC273/D204cMH000207

aPrimer set F1/UR is for the detection of all three types of PEDV with different amplicon sizes [original US and S INDEL PEDV (~880 bp); S1 NTD-del PEDV (~302 bp)]; F2/UR is for the original US PEDV (~650 bp); and F3/UR is for S INDEL PEDV (~358 bp)

bThese two samples (PC261 and PC262) were collected from the same farm at different times

cThese two samples (PC272 and PC273) were collected from the same farm at different times

dOriginal US PEDV strains with nucleotide mutations at the binding site or near the 3’-end of primer F2

eND: not done

fAcute watery diarrhea with no blood or mucus, increased mortality

g“showing signs of looseness”

h‘Unknown’: Submitting veterinarian did not include age of pigs

-: Negative

Detection of S1 NTD-del PEDVs from PEDV-positive pig fecal/oral fluid samples aPrimer set F1/UR is for the detection of all three types of PEDV with different amplicon sizes [original US and S INDEL PEDV (~880 bp); S1 NTD-del PEDV (~302 bp)]; F2/UR is for the original US PEDV (~650 bp); and F3/UR is for S INDEL PEDV (~358 bp) bThese two samples (PC261 and PC262) were collected from the same farm at different times cThese two samples (PC272 and PC273) were collected from the same farm at different times dOriginal US PEDV strains with nucleotide mutations at the binding site or near the 3’-end of primer F2 eND: not done fAcute watery diarrhea with no blood or mucus, increased mortality g“showing signs of looseness” h‘Unknown’: Submitting veterinarian did not include age of pigs -: Negative Among the 29 samples, 24 showed a single 880 bp-band with primer set F1/UR, indicating that they were positive for the original US PEDV or S INDEL PEDV, while five samples (PC259, PC261, PC262, PC272 and PC273) showed both the 880 bp-band and the 302 bp-band, indicating that they were coinfected with original US PEDV/S INDEL PEDV and S1 NTD-del PEDV (Fig. 1a). Both bands of the five samples were purified and sequenced using Sanger sequencing method. After running Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) at NCBI (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), we found that the virus-specific sequences shared the highest nucleotide identities (97-99%) with the original US PEDV and S1 NTD-del PEDV, respectively. Here, we designated the original US PEDV in a sample as ‘sample no./O’ and S1 NTD-del PEDV as ‘sample no./D followed by the number of amino acid deletions’. The deletion region of samples PC259/D194, PC262/D194 and PC272/D194 is the same, which is a 194 aa-fragment located between residues 23-216 of the S protein (Fig. 2). It is the same as that of the first field S1 NTD-del PEDV variant TTR-2/JPN/2014 (LC063828), which was detected from a PED outbreak in October 2014 in Japan [8]. However, by cloning and sequencing the shorter PCR products (~ 900 bp) of samples PC261 and PC273 with the primer set PEDV-20320-F (5’-AACACGTCATCGTCAGAGGC-3’) and PEDV-21816R (5’-CGGTTGGAGGTAAAACAGC-3’) targeting the 3’-end of the nsp16 gene and S1 gene, respectively [6], we found that sample PC261 contained two types of S1 NTD-del variants: PC261/D194 contained the above 194-aa deletion, while PC261/D201 contained a novel 201-aa deletion located at residues 30-230 of the S protein (Fig. 2). Sample PC273 contained three types of S1 NTD-del variants: 1) PC273/D194 contained the above 194-aa deletion, 2) PC273/D204 contained a 204-aa deletion located between residues 27-230 of the S protein, which is as same as PEDV variant JKa-292/CS1de204 (KU363094) reported in Japan in 2017 [1], and 3) PC273/D202 contained a novel 202-aa deletion located at residues 24-225 of the S protein (Fig. 2). Additionally, we sequenced the complete genome of one sample (PC273/O) using next generation sequencing as described previously [11]. From our study, the S1 NTD-del PEDV variants appeared as early as December 2016 and continued to circulate to at least May 2017 in Ohio swine farms. The 24 samples with a single 880 bp-band were tested by PCR with primer sets F2/UR for the original US PEDV and F3/UR for S INDEL PEDV, respectively (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Differentiation of original US PEDV, S INDEL PEDV, and S1 NTD-del PEDV using PCR assays with primer sets F1/UR, F2/UR and F3/UR. (a) PCR products following primary amplification with primer set F1/UR for S1 NTD-del PEDV (~302 bp), original US PEDV (~880 bp) and S INDEL PEDV (~880 bp). Lane 1: TC-PC177 as a positive control for S1 NTD-del PEDV. Lane 2: TC-PC22A as a positive control for the original US PEDV. Lanes 3- 22: PCR products of some samples with primer set F1/UR. The white arrows refer to the positive bands for S1 NTD-del PEDV variants: Samples PC259, PC261, PC262, PC272 and PC273 correspond to lanes 14, 15, 4, 22 and 6, respectively. (b) Samples, which were amplified with a single 880 bp-band by PCR with primer set F1/UR, were tested with primer sets F2/UR and F3/UR for differentiation of the original US (~650bp) and S INDEL (~358bp) PEDV, respectively. Lane 1: TC-PC22A as a positive control for the original US PEDV. Lane 8: TC-Iowa106 as a positive control for S INDEL PEDV. Lanes 2-7: PCR products of some samples. M: 100 bp ladder DNA marker (PHENIX Research Products, NC, USA)

Fig. 2

Diagram of deletion size and the location of each type of S1 NTD-del PEDV variant. PEDV variants detected in this study are marked with a solid triangle. Solid circles indicate the two new S1 NTD-del PEDV variants identified in this study

Differentiation of original US PEDV, S INDEL PEDV, and S1 NTD-del PEDV using PCR assays with primer sets F1/UR, F2/UR and F3/UR. (a) PCR products following primary amplification with primer set F1/UR for S1 NTD-del PEDV (~302 bp), original US PEDV (~880 bp) and S INDEL PEDV (~880 bp). Lane 1: TC-PC177 as a positive control for S1 NTD-del PEDV. Lane 2: TC-PC22A as a positive control for the original US PEDV. Lanes 3- 22: PCR products of some samples with primer set F1/UR. The white arrows refer to the positive bands for S1 NTD-del PEDV variants: Samples PC259, PC261, PC262, PC272 and PC273 correspond to lanes 14, 15, 4, 22 and 6, respectively. (b) Samples, which were amplified with a single 880 bp-band by PCR with primer set F1/UR, were tested with primer sets F2/UR and F3/UR for differentiation of the original US (~650bp) and S INDEL (~358bp) PEDV, respectively. Lane 1: TC-PC22A as a positive control for the original US PEDV. Lane 8: TC-Iowa106 as a positive control for S INDEL PEDV. Lanes 2-7: PCR products of some samples. M: 100 bp ladder DNA marker (PHENIX Research Products, NC, USA) Diagram of deletion size and the location of each type of S1 NTD-del PEDV variant. PEDV variants detected in this study are marked with a solid triangle. Solid circles indicate the two new S1 NTD-del PEDV variants identified in this study Among the 24 samples, 19 samples were positive for only the original US PEDV (650 bp). One sample (PC270) was positive only for S INDEL PEDV (358 bp). One sample (PC248) was positive for both types of PEDV. Three samples (PC250, PC269, and PC271) were positive with primer set F1/UR, but negative with both primer sets F2/UR and F3/UR. Therefore, their F1/UR PCR products (~880 bp) were sequenced. They were the original US PEDV with nucleotide mutations at the binding site or near the 3’-end of primer F2, resulting in no amplification by primer set F2/UR. In addition, we tried but failed to isolate any PEDV variants from the PEDV-positive clinical samples in Vero cells (ATCC#CCL81) using materials and methods described by our lab previously [6]. The S protein of a coronavirus is divided into S1 and S2 subunits, responsible for receptor binding and virus-cell membrane fusion to initiate infection, respectively [3]. The S1 subunit of an original US PEDV forms five domains (domain 0 [corresponding to the NTD], A, B, C and D) based on structure analysis [2]. Domain 0 and domain A are structurally similar and it has been hypothesized that either of them is likely dispensable [10]. It seems correct for PEDV because TC-PC177, TC-TTR-2, and an infectious clone-derived S1 NTD-del PEDV (icPC22A-S1Δ197) can replicate in vivo and in vitro [2, 9]. During the revision of this manuscript, a new publication reported that a single S1 NTD-del PEDV variant with a 200-aa del was detected from a diarrheic pig fecal sample in the US [12], indicating that PEDV with the S1 NTD-del PEDV is capable of replicating in live pigs. Why did the eight S1 NTD-del PEDV variants detected in this study co-infect pigs with the original US PEDV strains without exception, similar to the data from Japan? Fifteen types of S1 NTD-del PEDV variants bearing large deletions (ranging from 194 to 216 aa) (Fig. 2) co-infected pigs with PEDV strains possessing an intact S gene [1]. One possible reason could be that S1 NTD-del PEDV alone does not cause severe diarrhea as observed in the experimentally infected pigs [2, 9], and such samples were probably not submitted for diagnosis. The S1 subunit of the PEDV S gene is known to be the most variable region and has been widely used for studies of PEDV evolution and genetic diversity. By analyzing the partial sequences of S1 NTD-del PEDV variants in this study, we found the following facts: (1) The 258 nt sequences (covering from the 3’-end of the nsp16 gene to the partial S1 subunit) of PC262/O and PC262/D194 from the same clinical fecal sample had five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); (2) The 258 nt sequences (covering from the 3’-end of the nsp16 gene to the partial S1 subunit) of different clinical samples (PC259/D194, PC261/D194, PC262/D194, PC272/D194 and PC273/D194) had 0-7 SNPs, and the 858 nt sequences (covering from the 3’-end of the nsp16 gene to the partial S1 subunit) of PC261/D194 and PC273/D194 had six SNPs. Detection of both ‘D’ and ‘O’ variants in the same clinical sample indicates that the pig was infected with both viruses. The NTD of S1 has been reported to be responsible for binding to sialic acids and the deletion of the S1 NTD did not decrease the induction of virus neutralizing antibodies, but reduced the virulence of the highly virulent PEDV in neonatal piglets [2]. It was documented that sialic acid binding activity of the PEDV S protein facilitates cell entry [3]. Therefore, although the S1 NTD of PEDV does not contain predominant virus neutralizing epitopes and seems dispensable, it is believed to be important for pathogenicity. A good example is the transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), another porcine enteric alphacoronavirus. Its S1 NTD-del variant porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCV) changes the major tissue tropism of TGEV changing the disease from a primarily enteric one to a mild respiratory disease in pigs [7]. Due to the shared immunogenicity between TGEV and PRCV, the widespread prevalence of PRCV has lessened the clinical impact of TGE in Europe. Similarly, inoculation with S1 NTD-del PEDV is associated with decreased severity of enteric disease in pigs [2]. In contrast to TGEV, the S1 NTD-del PEDV strains retained their enteric tropism [2, 9]. Although the large scale outbreaks of PEDV in the US are now less commonly seen, sporadic small scale outbreaks or persistent infections of PEDV in some pig farms are still detected. We hypothesize that co-infection of S1 NTD-del PEDV variants may stimulate population immunity that protects the pigs from large scale outbreaks caused by the virulent strain of US PEDV. The variant strains may also be responsible for the persistence of virulent strains of PEDV at some farms. Further studies are warranted to determine if the clinically mild strains of S1 NTD-del PEDV variants continue to evolve and potentially replace the virulent strain of PEDV in the field, similar to what happened to PRCV and TGEV. This is the first report of the coinfection of S1 NTD-del PEDV and original US PEDV strains in US pigs, indicating that active PEDV evolution is transpiring. This may contribute to the changing PED disease patterns in the US. The previously identified original US PEDV strains as well as the S INDEL PEDV are still circulating in the US.
  9 in total

1.  Identification and Application of Epitopes in EtMIC1 of Eimeria tenella Recognized by the Monoclonal Antibodies 1-A1 and 1-H2.

Authors:  Ningning Zhao; Shuzhen Ming; Yaru Lu; Fangkun Wang; Hongmei Li; Xiao Zhang; Xiaomin Zhao
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Genetic evolution analysis and pathogenicity assessment of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains circulating in part of China during 2011-2017.

Authors:  Pengfei Chen; Kang Wang; Yixuan Hou; Huichun Li; Xianbin Li; Lingxue Yu; Yifeng Jiang; Fei Gao; Wu Tong; Hai Yu; Zhibiao Yang; Guangzhi Tong; Yanjun Zhou
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 3.342

3.  Significant inhibition of re-emerged and emerging swine enteric coronavirus in vitro using the multiple shRNA expression vector.

Authors:  Kai Li; Hao Li; Zhen Bi; Deping Song; Fanfan Zhang; Dan Lei; Suxian Luo; Zhiquan Li; Wang Gong; Dongyan Huang; Yu Ye; Yuxin Tang
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 5.970

Review 4.  Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV): An update on etiology, transmission, pathogenesis, and prevention and control.

Authors:  Kwonil Jung; Linda J Saif; Qiuhong Wang
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.303

Review 5.  Emerging Highly Virulent Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus: Molecular Mechanisms of Attenuation and Rational Design of Live Attenuated Vaccines.

Authors:  Yixuan Hou; Qiuhong Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A Virulent PEDV Strain FJzz1 with Genomic Mutations and Deletions at the High Passage Level Was Attenuated in Piglets via Serial Passage In Vitro.

Authors:  Pengfei Chen; Xiongwei Zhao; Shuting Zhou; Tianxing Zhou; Xiangmei Tan; Xia Wu; Wu Tong; Fei Gao; Lingxue Yu; Yifeng Jiang; Hai Yu; Zhibiao Yang; Guangzhi Tong; Yanjun Zhou
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.327

7.  Comparative Characterization and Pathogenicity of a Novel Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) with a Naturally Occurring Truncated ORF3 Gene Coinfected with PEDVs Possessing an Intact ORF3 Gene in Piglets.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Weijian Huang; Lian Zhong; Yibin Qin; Xueting Liu; Chunjie Yang; Ruomu Wang; Xueli Su; Chen Du; Xue Mi; Hejie Wang; Ying He; Wu Zhao; Ying Chen; Zuzhang Wei; Kang Ouyang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  The enhanced replication of an S-intact PEDV during coinfection with an S1 NTD-del PEDV in piglets.

Authors:  Yunfang Su; Yixuan Hou; Qiuhong Wang
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 9.  Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.