| Literature DB >> 29789280 |
Teppei Suzuki1, Tomoko Shimoda1, Noriko Takahashi1, Kaori Tsutsumi1, Mina Samukawa1, Sadako Yoshimura1, Katsuhiko Ogasawara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As the onset of osteoporosis leads to reduced activities of daily living and may result in patients being bedridden, efforts to prevent decreased bone density are necessary. Various studies on the relationship between sex, age, nutrients, and exercise habits and bone mineral density have been conducted to date. However, for snowy region residents, the magnitude of influence of various factors affecting bone mineral density and the influence level have not been clarified.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian network; health behavior change; health care promotion
Year: 2018 PMID: 29789280 PMCID: PMC6283262 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.8555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interact J Med Res ISSN: 1929-073X
Characteristics of study population by sex and age.
| Characteristics | n (%) | |
| Women | 267 (75.4) | |
| Men | 87 (24.6) | |
| 20-29 | 12 (3.4) | |
| 30-39 | 26 (7.3) | |
| 40-49 | 24 (6.8) | |
| 50-59 | 69 (19.5) | |
| 60-69 | 136 (38.4) | |
| 70-79 | 76 (21.5) | |
| 80+ | 11 (3.1) | |
Variables with their values as used in the Baysian network model.
| Factors | Survey method and contents | Values and ranges |
| Fracture | Questionnaire: fracture experience | No, yes |
| Exercise | Questionnaire: medium strength sports that last ≥10 min | No, yes |
| Calcium | Brief-type dietary history questionnaire | Adequate, slightly inadequatea, inadequatea |
| Vitamin D | Brief-type dietary history questionnaire | Adequate, slightly adequatea, inadequatea |
| Cholesterol | Brief-type dietary history questionnaire | Adequate, slightly higha, higha |
| Sex | Body composition meter | Female, male |
| Age, years | Body composition meter | <65, ≥65a |
| BMIc, kg/m2 | Body composition meter | Normal (<25), obesitya (≥25) |
| Muscle mass, kg | Body composition meter | <37.0, 37-44.9, ≥45.0a |
| Obesity, % | Body composition meter | Underweight (<–10), normal (–10 to 10), overweighta (10 to 20), obesitya (≤20) |
aRisk factor.
bBMI: body mass index.
Criteria for bone density status using T-score.
| Bone density status | T-score |
| Normal | –1.0 and higher |
| Osteopenia | –1.0 to –2.5 |
| Osteoporosis | –2.5 and lower |
Figure 1Formulas of precision, recall and F-measure.
Measurement results.
| Characteristics | Male, n | Female, n | Total, n | |
| Normal (<25) | 57 | 213 | 270 | |
| Obesity (≥25) | 28 | 42 | 70 | |
| <37 | 2 | 180 | 182 | |
| 37 to 45 | 28 | 69 | 97 | |
| ≥45 | 55 | 6 | 61 | |
| Underweight (<–10) | 8 | 60 | 68 | |
| Normal (–10 to 10) | 43 | 138 | 181 | |
| Overweight (10 to 20) | 15 | 31 | 46 | |
| Obesity (≥20) | 19 | 26 | 45 | |
| Adequate | 46 | 141 | 187 | |
| Slightly inadequate | 9 | 40 | 49 | |
| Inadequate | 32 | 77 | 109 | |
| Adequate | 84 | 244 | 328 | |
| Slightly inadequate | 0 | 9 | 9 | |
| Inadequate | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
| Adequate | 79 | 233 | 312 | |
| Slightly high | 4 | 22 | 26 | |
| High | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Yes | 17 | 32 | 49 | |
| No | 65 | 215 | 280 | |
| Yes | 76 | 219 | 295 | |
| No | 6 | 28 | 34 | |
Bone density by sex (χ2=1.742, P=.418).
| Bone density | Male (n=87), n (%) | Female (n=267), n (%) |
| Normal | 43 (49) | 117 (44.8) |
| Osteopenia | 36 (41) | 112 (41.9) |
| Osteoporosis | 8 (9) | 38 (14.2) |
Result of multiple regression analysis.
| Variable | Regression coefficient | |
| Age | –0.67 | <.001 |
| Sex | –12.44 | <.001 |
| Fracture | –1.55 | .009 |
| Calcium | 0.01 | .027 |
Figure 2Prior probability by Bayesian network.
Figure 3Bayesian network model of factors influencing bone density.
T-score prediction accuracy.
| Bone density | Precision | Recall | F-measure |
| Normal | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.61 |
| Osteopenia | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.48 |
| Osteoporosis | 0.5 | 0.14 | 0.22 |
Mutual information.
| Variable | Mutual information |
| Age | 0.065 |
| Fracture | 0.014 |
| Sex | 0.008 |
| Calcium | 0.002 |
Figure 4The combination with the highest probability of osteoporosis.
Figure 5The combination with the highest probability of osteopenia.
Figure 6Posterior probability of calcium and T-score in the absence of fracture experience.
Changes in the posterior probability of calcium in the absence of fracture experience.
| Calcium | Prior probability | Posterior probability | Variation (%) |
| Inadequate | 0.30 | 0.28 | –1.59 |
| Slightly inadequate | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.54 |
| Adequate | 0.56 | 0.57 | –1.05 |
Changes in posterior probability of T-score in the absence of fracture experience.
| T-score | Prior probability | Posterior probability | Variation (%) |
| Normal | 0.44 | 0.46 | 2.46 |
| Osteopenia | 0.4 | 0.40 | 0.27 |
| Osteoporosis | 0.16 | 0.14 | 2.19 |