| Literature DB >> 29789036 |
I Ruiz-Ascacibar1, P Stoll1, M Kreuzer2, G Bee1.
Abstract
Breeding efforts over the last decades altered markedly empty body (EB) composition of pigs. This study aimed to re-evaluate the dynamics of changes in the composition and deposition rate of fat, protein and amino acids (AA) in the EB from birth to 140 kg BW depending on the dietary CP and AA supply in a current pig genotype. In the experiment 66 entire male, 58 castrated and 66 female Swiss Large White pigs were used. From 20 kg BW onwards, they had either ad libitum access to a control (C) diet or a diet (LP) compared to diet C only 80% of CP, lysine, methione+cystine, threonine and tryptophan. The EB composition was determined at birth on eight boars and eight females, at 10 and 20 kg BW on two boars, two castrates and two females, and at 20 kg intervals from 40 to 140 kg BW, on four pigs per gender and dietary treatment. Each EB fraction was weighed and analysed for protein, fat and AA profile. The AA-to-lysine ratio was calculated and the different chemical component contents were fitted to allometric regressions. Overall, C-boars had the greatest EB protein and AA content and deposition rates, and lowest fat content and deposition rates. At the beginning of the grower period, LP-castrates and females displayed the lowest protein and AA and the highest fat deposition rates. However, compared with their counterparts in the C-group, in LP-castrates and females protein and AA deposition rates were greater above 64 and 40 kg EB weight, respectively, whereas fat deposition rates was lower above 80 kg EB weight. Thus, there seems a great potential to optimise protein and AA efficiency especially in the finisher period in castrates and females. Important individual variations were found in the essential AA-to-lysine ratio of the EB. Phenylalanine and threonine-to-lysine ratios decreased with increasing EB weight. Valine- and threonine-to-lysine ratios in C-castrates and C-females were 5% and 4% greater than recently reported by the National Research Council (NRC) whereas cysteine-, methionine- and tyrosine-to-lysine ratios were lower by 34%, 25% and 10%, respectively. The clear differences found between the EB AA-to-lysine ratios in the present study and the NRC might partly be explained by the genotype and the temporal changes in the relative weight of each EB fraction or changes in the AA profile. Nevertheless, these findings on changes in the essential AA profile of tissue protein warrant further studies.Entities:
Keywords: allometric equations; amino acid profile; amino acid relative deposition; dietary protein deficiency; fat and protein relative deposition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29789036 PMCID: PMC6316349 DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animal ISSN: 1751-7311 Impact factor: 3.240
Protein, amino acids and fat content of the empty body (g) from female (FE), castrated (CA) and entire male (EM) pigs from 40 to 140 kg BW fed either a control (C) or low CP (LP) diet, estimated across the BW categories of 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 kg
| Control | Low CP | Orthogonal | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet | EM | CA | FE | EM | CA | FE | contrasts |
| Protein | 15 077 (1221.3) | 14 324 (1095.0) | 14 420 (1112.7) | 14 068 (1137.0) | 14 367 (1171.9) | 14 152 (1140.5) | c, e |
| Fat | 14 188 (1585.3) | 19 233 (2393.2) | 17 573 (2206.3) | 17 261 (1936.4) | 21 337 (2392.4) | 19 277 (2087.4) | a, b, c, d, e |
| Amino acid | |||||||
| Lysine | 1 051 (91.9) | 938 (70.6) | 956 (74.3) | 754 (60.7) | 932 (76.3) | 947 (83.0) | c, d, e |
| Methionine | 215 (23.8) | 193 (18.8) | 208 (17.2) | 183 (17.0) | 185 (15.6) | 199 (22.1) | e |
| Cystine | 93 (8.9) | 88 (7.6) | 83 (6.7) | 78 (7.6) | 85 (8.3) | 86 (9.8) | – |
| Methionine+cystine | 309 (31.8) | 281 (25.4) | 290 (23.0) | 261 (23.4) | 269 (23.2) | 285 (30.5) | e |
| Threonine | 583 (49.7) | 522 (37.1) | 522 (42.9) | 511 (42.7) | 498 (39.6) | 506 (43.4) | c, e |
| Phenylalanine | 541 (45.5) | 492 (37.0) | 488 (37.0) | 473 (39.6) | 473 (37.5) | 479 (41.7) | c, e |
| Tyrosine | 359 (33.8) | 323 (25.4) | 323 (26.7) | 310 (27.0) | 318 (26.6) | 320 (28.0) | e |
| Valine | 730 (62.5) | 653 (48.1) | 652 (49.2) | 635 (53.8) | 634 (51.0) | 644 (57.3) | c, e |
| Leucine | 1 050 (90.4) | 959 (72.0) | 956 (75.0) | 931 (80.0) | 929 (75.6) | 942 (84.7) | c, e |
| Isoleucine | 539 (49.4) | 484 (37.7) | 491 (40.8) | 470 (41.5) | 473 (39.6) | 481 (44.3) | c, e |
| Histidine | 473 (43.8) | 439 (41.0) | 459 (42.6) | 439 (39.4) | 427 (36.8) | 427 (39.4) | e |
To assess whether any of the diet×gender combinations could be plotted in the same regression equation, data (ranks were assigned to the transformed data within each BW category from 40 to 140 kg) were subjected to the ANOVA procedure considering the experimental groups (C-EM, C-FE, C-CA, LP-EM, LP-FE, LP-CA), period and the two-way interaction as fixed effects, followed by orthogonal contrast.
Results are expressed as means (standard deviations) of the fat, protein and amino acid content of the transformed data (detailed description in Supplementary Material S1). These transformed data correspond to an average empty BW of 87 (6.9) kg.
The C-diets were formulated to meet nutrient requirements for grower-finisher pigs in the grower, finisher I and finisher II periods according to the Swiss feeding recommendations for pigs; the LP-diets were formulated to contain, expressed as percentage of C-diets, 80% of dietary CP, lysine, methionine+cystine, threonine and tryptophan.
Significant (P<0.05) orthogonal contrast were expressed by a letter as follows: a=C-FE v. C-CA; b=LP-FE v. LP-CA; c=C-EM v. C-FE/CA; d=LP-EM v. LP-FE/CA; e=C-FE/CA/EM v. LP-FE/CA/EM.
Allometric growth coefficients for protein, fat and amino acid amount (g) of the empty body of female (FE), castrated (CA) and entire male (EM) pigs from birth to 140 kg BW fed the control (C) or low CP (LP) diets
| Item | Diet | Gender |
| ASE of |
| ASE of |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | C | EM | 153.4 | 17.66 | 1.026 | 0.0248 | 0.993 |
| CA, FE | 195.0 | 16.18 | 0.963 | 0.0179 | 0.991 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 159.3 | 8.85 | 1.002 | 0.0119 | 0.994 | |
| Fat | C | EM | 25.3 | 9.22 | 1.409 | 0.0776 | 0.967 |
| CA | 8.8 | 3.24 | 1.703 | 0.0778 | 0.977 | ||
| FE | 7.9 | 3.33 | 1.705 | 0.0885 | 0.970 | ||
| LP | EM | 19.9 | 5.37 | 1.502 | 0.0570 | 0.984 | |
| CA | 27.1 | 6.59 | 1.481 | 0.0513 | 0.986 | ||
| FE | 30.0 | 5.14 | 1.437 | 0.0363 | 0.993 | ||
| Amino acids | |||||||
| Lysine | C | EM | 10.7 | 3.55 | 1.026 | 0.0715 | 0.944 |
| CA, FE | 17.5 | 3.83 | 0.893 | 0.0474 | 0.928 | ||
| LP | EM | 10.9 | 2.64 | 0.990 | 0.0522 | 0.967 | |
| CA, FE | 11.5 | 2.37 | 0.987 | 0.0445 | 0.947 | ||
| Methionine | C | EM, CA, FE | 3.4 | 1.17 | 0.919 | 0.0750 | 0.788 |
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 2.5 | 0.69 | 0.977 | 0.0585 | 0.872 | |
| Cystine | C, LP | EM, CA, FE | 1.1 | 0.29 | 0.974 | 0.0561 | 0.803 |
| Methionine+cystine | C | EM, CA, FE | 5.1 | 1.55 | 0.906 | 0.0658 | 0.824 |
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 3.1 | 0.76 | 1.008 | 0.0524 | 0.901 | |
| Threonine | C | EM | 6.0 | 1.74 | 1.023 | 0.0624 | 0.957 |
| CA, FE | 10.2 | 2.38 | 0.881 | 0.0507 | 0.916 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 7.9 | 1.38 | 0.931 | 0.0375 | 0.938 | |
| Phenylalanine | C | EM | 6.0 | 1.76 | 1.008 | 0.0636 | 0.954 |
| CA, FE | 9.4 | 1.95 | 0.885 | 0.0450 | 0.933 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 7.0 | 1.12 | 0.944 | 0.0346 | 0.948 | |
| Tyrosine | C | EM, CA, FE | 4.5 | 1.04 | 0.966 | 0.0504 | 0.902 |
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 3.8 | 0.63 | 0.989 | 0.0356 | 0.950 | |
| Valine | C | EM | 7.5 | 2.29 | 1.023 | 0.0654 | 0.952 |
| CA, FE | 13.3 | 2.70 | 0.872 | 0.0442 | 0.934 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 9.0 | 1.50 | 0.954 | 0.0359 | 0.945 | |
| Leucine | C | EM | 10.7 | 3.32 | 1.025 | 0.0668 | 0.951 |
| CA, FE | 16.4 | 3.20 | 0.910 | 0.0423 | 0.944 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 11.9 | 1.89 | 0.977 | 0.0341 | 0.953 | |
| Isoleucine | C | EM | 4.8 | 1.95 | 1.055 | 0.0871 | 0.924 |
| CA, FE | 8.3 | 2.10 | 0.911 | 0.0548 | 0.910 | ||
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 5.5 | 0.94 | 1.000 | 0.0369 | 0.948 | |
| Histidine | C | EM, CA, FE | 4.8 | 1.33 | 1.016 | 0.0591 | 0.884 |
| LP | EM, CA, FE | 5.0 | 1.05 | 0.998 | 0.0455 | 0.924 |
ASE=asymptotic standard error.
The different treatments (C-EM, C-CA, C-FE, LP-EM, LP-CA and LP-FE) were grouped based on the outcome of the orthogonal contrasts between genders and diets, as specified and tested in Table 1.
The allometric regression used was Y=a×EBW, where Y is the predicted amount (g) of EB protein, amino acid or fat; EBW the empty BW (kg); b the allometric coefficient; a the constant. R 2 is based on the original and untransformed data.
The C-diets were formulated to meet nutrient requirements for grower-finisher pigs in the grower, finisher I and finisher II periods according to the Swiss feeding recommendations for pigs; the LP-diets were formulated to contain, expressed as percentage of C-diets, 80% of dietary CP, lysine, methionine+cystine, threonine and tryptophan.
Figure 1Dynamics of changes in relative deposition rates (g/kg empty BW gain) of protein (a), fat (b), lysine (c), tyrosine (d) and histidine (e) with increasing empty BW, grouped on the basis of orthogonal contrasts between genders and diets as specified and tested in Table 1. Data of pigs from birth to 140 kg BW were used for calculating the allometric equations. EM=entire males; CA=castrated pigs; FE=females pigs. The control diets (C) were formulated to meet nutrient requirements according to the standard Swiss feeding recommendations for grower-finisher pigs in the respective growth periods; the low CP diets (LP) were formulated to contain, expressed as percentage of the C-diets, 80% of dietary CP, lysine, methionine+cystine, threonine and tryptophan.
Lysine to protein (g/100 g protein) and amino acid profile (g amino acid/100 g lysine) in the empty body of female (FE), castrated (CA) and entire male (EM) pigs fed the control (C) or low CP (LP) grower (20 to 60 kg), finisher I (60 to 100 kg) and finisher II (100 to 140 kg) diets
| Diet C | Diet LP |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | EM | CA | FE | EM | CA | FE | Diet | Gender | BW category |
| Lysine to protein | 7.0 (0.2) | 6.7 (0.19) | 6.7 (0.22) | 6.4 (0.14) | 6.8 (0.22) | 6.7 (0.22) | 0.299 | 0.906 | 0.710 |
| Methionine | 20.7 (1.17) | 20.4 (1.14) | 21.7 (0.75) | 20.3 (1.00) | 22.3 (0.57) | 21.3 (0.96) | 0.824 | 0.658 | 0.522 |
| Cystine | 9.1 (0.50) | 9.5 (0.56) | 8.9 (0.59) | 8.6 (0.45) | 8.9 (0.35) | 9.1 (0.5.0) | 0.994 | 0.398 | 0.656 |
| Methionine +cystine | 29.8 (1.44) | 30.0 (1.45) | 30.5 (1.09) | 28.9 (1.14) | 31.3 (0.78) | 30.3 (1.18) | 0.962 | 0.598 | 0.803 |
| Threonine | 55.6 (0.53) | 56.1 (1.07) | 54.4 (0.64) | 56.3 (1.19) | 53.9 (0.67) | 54.9 (1.01) | 0.360 | 0.068 | 0.014 |
| Phenylalanine | 52.0 (0.59) | 52.5 (0.56) | 51.3 (0.60) | 52.2 (0.79) | 51.2 (0.52) | 52.0 (0.66) | 0.562 | 0.843 | 0.012 |
| Tyrosine | 33.9 (0.65) | 34.3 (0.63) | 33.6 (0.44) | 34.1 (0.77) | 34.0 (0.52) | 34.6 (0.61) | 0.288 | 0.910 | 0.731 |
| Valine | 69.8 (0.66) | 69.9 (0.83) | 68.6 (0.94) | 69.9 (1.09) | 68.3 (0.70) | 69.6 (1.03) | 0.904 | 0.698 | 0.584 |
| Leucine | 100.3 (0.61) | 102.4 (1.61) | 100.2 (1.05) | 101.9 (1.15) | 99.8 (0.78) | 101.4 (1.02) | 0.635 | 0.955 | 0.794 |
| Isoleucine | 51.0 (0.54) | 51.4 (0.68) | 51.0 (0.50) | 51.1 (0.64) | 50.5 (0.42) | 51.6 (0.52) | 0.771 | 0.569 | 0.236 |
| Histidine | 44.4 (0.79) | 45.5 (1.72) | 47.0 (1.29) | 47.8 (1.75) | 45.4 (0.94) | 45.7 (1.19) | 0.963 | 0.688 | <0.001 |
Values are expressed as least square means across the slaughter BW categories of 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 kg. Standard error of the least square means are displayed in brackets.
The C-diets were formulated to meet nutrient requirements for grower-finisher pigs in the grower, finisher I and finisher II periods according to the Swiss feeding recommendations for pigs; the LP-diets were formulated to contain, expressed as percentage of C-diets, 80% of dietary CP, lysine, methionine+cystine, threonine and tryptophan.
Probability values for the effects of diet, gender and BW category. The probability values for the effect of serie and the interactions are not shown.