| Literature DB >> 29789003 |
Yusuke Kamiya1, Marika Nomura2, Hina Ogino3, Kanako Yoshikawa4, Latsamy Siengsounthone5, Phonepadith Xangsayarath6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood stunting (height-for-age z-scores below - 2), a form of chronic undernutrition, remains a global health burden. Although a growing literature has examined the association between mothers' autonomy and childhood stunting, these studies have been limited to countries in South Asia or Sub-Saharan Africa where women have relatively lower social status than do men. Little research has analyzed the effect of mothers' autonomy on childhood stunting in Lao PDR, where women's social status is relatively high compared to that in other countries.Entities:
Keywords: Childhood stunting; Lao PDR; Mother; Undernutrition; Women’s autonomy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29789003 PMCID: PMC5964969 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0567-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Mother’s autonomy
| Dimension of autonomy | Total | Stunted | Not stunted | Diff. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy | |||||
| Health service | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.0 | −0.3 | 0.067* |
| Borrow money | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 | −0.1 | 0.513 |
| Self-esteem | |||||
| (1) Goes out without telling husband | 47% | 43% | 48% | −5% | 0.703 |
| (2) Argues with husband | 54% | 43% | 57% | −14% | 0.253 |
| (3) Refuse sex with husband | 74% | 57% | 79% | −23% | 0.030** |
| (4) Not to obey elders | 51% | 39% | 55% | −15% | 0.198 |
| Composite score of (1)~(4) | 0.57 | 0.46 | 0.60 | −0.14 | 0.116 |
| Decision-making power | |||||
| (1) Daily household expenses | 60% | 78% | 55% | 24% | 0.042** |
| (2) Child health care | 42% | 48% | 40% | 8% | 0.054* |
| (3) Health care for wife | 58% | 74% | 53% | 21% | 0.524 |
| (4) Visit family or relatives | 37% | 48% | 34% | 14% | 0.224 |
| Composite score of (1)~(4) | 0.49 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.17 | 0.083* |
| Freedom of mobility | |||||
| (1) Visit friends | 40% | 39% | 40% | −1% | 0.924 |
| (2) Go shopping | 47% | 48% | 47% | 1% | 0.929 |
| (3) Go to clinic or hospital | 37% | 39% | 36% | 3% | 0.812 |
| (4) Go outside the village | 30% | 30% | 30% | 1% | 0.959 |
| Composite score of (1)~(4) | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.938 |
| Control of money | |||||
| Have money to use | 38% | 35% | 39% | −4% | 0.720 |
*p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, p-value by t-test
Socio-demographic characteristics of children and their mothers
| Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Child ( | ||
| Nutritional status | ||
| Stunted | 24 | 21% |
| Not stunted | 91 | 79% |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 51 | 44% |
| Male | 64 | 56% |
| Age (month) | ||
| 0–11 | 23 | 20% |
| 12–23 | 17 | 15% |
| 24–35 | 26 | 23% |
| 36–47 | 21 | 18% |
| 48–59 | 28 | 24% |
| Mother ( | ||
| Age (year) | ||
| 17–25 | 25 | 25% |
| 26–30 | 29 | 29% |
| 31–35 | 32 | 32% |
| 36–46 | 14 | 14% |
| Educational level | ||
| Preschool/Primary | 38 | 38% |
| Lower secondary | 27 | 27% |
| Upper secondary | 25 | 25% |
| College/University | 10 | 10% |
Results of logistics regressions on the childhood stunting
| Outcome variable: whether the child is stunted (=1) or not (=0) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Mother’s autonomy | |||||||
| Self-efficacy: health | 0.15 | ||||||
| (0.007)*** | |||||||
| Self-efficacy: money | 1.05 | ||||||
| (0.909) | |||||||
| Self-esteem | 0.11 | ||||||
| (0.025)** | |||||||
| Decision-making | 2.66 | ||||||
| (0.207) | |||||||
| Freedom of mobility | 1.10 | ||||||
| (0.902) | |||||||
| Control of money | 0.11 | ||||||
| (0.041)** | |||||||
| Childa | |||||||
| Female | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
| (0.004)*** | (0.002)*** | (0.004)*** | (0.001)*** | (0.002)*** | (0.004)*** | (0.015)** | |
| Age (month) | |||||||
| 12–23b | |||||||
| 24–35 | 3.69 | 2.33 | 3.74 | 6.43 | 4.35 | 3.72 | 2.75 |
| (0.270) | (0.512) | (0.262) | (0.203) | (0.217) | (0.275) | (0.403) | |
| 36–47 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| (0.112) | (0.084)* | (0.117) | (0.137) | (0.172) | (0.113) | (0.054)* | |
| 48–59 | 0.75 | 0.49 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.75 | 0.28 |
| (0.770) | (0.510) | (0.786) | (0.841) | (0.877) | (0.774) | (0.364) | |
| Mother | |||||||
| Age (year) | |||||||
| 17–25b | |||||||
| 26–30 | 1.92 | 3.36 | 1.91 | 2.61 | 1.73 | 1.93 | 4.27 |
| (0.471) | (0.228) | (0.476) | (0.349) | (0.563) | (0.468) | (0.315) | |
| 31–35 | 0.23 | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.14 |
| (0.219) | (0.569) | (0.219) | (0.342) | (0.279) | (0.231) | (0.110) | |
| 36–46 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.43 |
| (0.282) | (0.519) | (0.283) | (0.246) | (0.335) | (0.286) | (0.523) | |
| Educational level | |||||||
| Preschool/Primaryb | |||||||
| Lower secondary | 0.24 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.10 |
| (0.106) | (0.517) | (0.117) | (0.138) | (0.219) | (0.111) | (0.048)** | |
| Upper secondary | 0.71 | 2.03 | 0.71 | 1.03 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| (0.681) | (0.468) | (0.680) | (0.972) | (0.780) | (0.722) | (0.806) | |
| College/University | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.56 |
| (0.210) | (0.218) | (0.211) | (0.326) | (0.229) | (0.209) | (0.571) | |
| Height | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| (0.006)*** | (0.003)*** | (0.006)*** | (0.001)*** | (0.009)*** | (0.006)*** | (<0.001)*** | |
| Household’s asset | |||||||
| Lowestb | |||||||
| Lower middle | 0.73 | 0.26 | 0.73 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 0.49 |
| (0.727) | (0.163) | (0.728) | (0.674) | (0.701) | (0.728) | (0.549) | |
| Upper middle | 0.53 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 1.23 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.36 |
| (0.485) | (0.330) | (0.462) | (0.812) | (0.386) | (0.465) | (0.351) | |
| Highest | 0.36 | 0.20 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.36 | 0.17 |
| (0.356) | (0.206) | (0.352) | (0.470) | (0.374) | (0.364) | (0.182) | |
| Observations | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 |
Estimated coefficients are odds ratio (OR). p-value in parenthesis
***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1
aChildren under 12 months are not included in the sample
bReference group, Estimated results for the village dummies are omitted from the table