Sebastian Merkel1, Alexander Kucharski1. 1. Institute for Work and Technology, Westphalian University of Applied Sciences, Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: Participatory design (PD) is widely used within gerontechnology but there is no common understanding about which methods are used for what purposes. This review aims to examine what different forms of PD exist in the field of gerontechnology and how these can be categorized. Design and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review covering several databases. The search strategy was based on 3 elements: (1) participatory methods and approaches with (2) older persons aiming at developing (3) technology for older people. Results: Our final review included 26 studies representing a variety of technologies designed/developed and methods/instruments applied. According to the technologies, the publications reviewed can be categorized in 3 groups: Studies that (1) use already existing technology with the aim to find new ways of use; (2) aim at creating new devices; (3) test and/or modify prototypes. The implementation of PD depends on the questions: Why a participatory approach is applied, who is involved as future user(s), when those future users are involved, and how they are incorporated into the innovation process. Implications: There are multiple ways, methods, and instruments to integrate users into the innovation process. Which methods should be applied, depends on the context. However, most studies do not evaluate if participatory approaches will lead to a better acceptance and/or use of the co-developed products. Therefore, participatory design should follow a comprehensive strategy, starting with the users' needs and ending with an evaluation if the applied methods have led to better results.
Purpose of the Study: Participatory design (PD) is widely used within gerontechnology but there is no common understanding about which methods are used for what purposes. This review aims to examine what different forms of PD exist in the field of gerontechnology and how these can be categorized. Design and Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review covering several databases. The search strategy was based on 3 elements: (1) participatory methods and approaches with (2) older persons aiming at developing (3) technology for older people. Results: Our final review included 26 studies representing a variety of technologies designed/developed and methods/instruments applied. According to the technologies, the publications reviewed can be categorized in 3 groups: Studies that (1) use already existing technology with the aim to find new ways of use; (2) aim at creating new devices; (3) test and/or modify prototypes. The implementation of PD depends on the questions: Why a participatory approach is applied, who is involved as future user(s), when those future users are involved, and how they are incorporated into the innovation process. Implications: There are multiple ways, methods, and instruments to integrate users into the innovation process. Which methods should be applied, depends on the context. However, most studies do not evaluate if participatory approaches will lead to a better acceptance and/or use of the co-developed products. Therefore, participatory design should follow a comprehensive strategy, starting with the users' needs and ending with an evaluation if the applied methods have led to better results.
Authors: Arianna Poli; Susanne Kelfve; Leonie Klompstra; Anna Strömberg; Tiny Jaarsma; Andreas Motel-Klingebiel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Wiktoria Wilkowska; Julia Offermann-van Heek; Thea Laurentius; L Cornelius Bollheimer; Martina Ziefle Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-07-02
Authors: Pieter Vandekerckhove; Marleen de Mul; Wichor M Bramer; Antoinette A de Bont Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Antoine Piau; Claude Vautier; Adelaïde De Mauleon; Achille Tchalla; Pierre Rumeau; Fati Nourhashemi; Maria Soto-Martin Journal: Geriatr Nurs Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.361