Literature DB >> 29788126

Characterizing the acute heat stress response in gilts: II. Assessing repeatability and association with fertility.

Kody L Graves1, Jacob T Seibert1, Aileen F Keating1, Lance H Baumgard1, Jason W Ross1.   

Abstract

Mitigating heat stress (HS) in swine production is important as it detrimentally affects multiple aspects of overall animal production efficiency. Study objectives were to determine if gilts characterized as tolerant (TOL) or susceptible (SUS) in response to HS maintain that phenotype later in life and if that phenotype influences reproductive ability during HS. Individual gilts identified as TOL (n = 50) or SUS (n = 50) from a prepubertal HS challenge were selected based on their rectal temperature (TR) during acute HS. The study consisted of 4 experimental periods (P). During P0 (2 d), all pigs were exposed to thermoneutral (TN) conditions (21.1 °C). During P1 (14 d), all gilts received Matrix (15 mg altrenogest per day) to synchronize estrus, and were maintained in TN conditions. During P2 (9 d), Matrix supplementation was terminated and gilts were subjected to diurnal HS with ambient temperatures set at 35 °C from 1000 to 2200 h and 21 °C from 2200 to 1000 h. Also during P2 gilts underwent estrus detection and artificial insemination. During P3 gilts were housed in TN conditions for 41 d at which they were sacrificed and reproductive tracts were collected. During the last 2 d of P1 and throughout the entirety of P2, TR and skin temperature (TS) were recorded. During P2, SUS had increased TR relative to TOL pigs during P2 (0.27 °C; P < 0.01). Overall, uterine wet weight, ovarian weight, corpora lutea (CL) count, and embryo survival were 5.6 ± 0.1 kg, 21.6 ± 0.3 g, 17.8 ± 0.3 CLs, and 79 ± 2%, respectively, and not influenced by prepubertal HS tolerance classification (P ≥ 0.37). Tolerant gilts had a longer return-to-estrus (6.1 vs. 5.5 d, respectively; P = 0.01) following altrenogest withdrawal and tended to have larger CL diameters (10.3 vs. 10.1 mm; P = 0.06) compared to SUS gilts. Fetal weight (25.4 vs. 23.6 g; P = 0.01) and fetal crown-rump length (74.8 vs. 72.8 mm; P < 0.01) were higher in gilts previously classified as SUS compared to those previously classified as TOL. Additionally, neither litter size nor the number of fetuses detected as a percentage of ovulations was influenced by classification. In summary, SUS gilts had a shorter return-to-estrus, increased fetus size, and tended to have smaller CL diameters compared to TOL gilts. Additionally, SUS gilts also retained their inability to maintain euthermia postpubertally relative to TOL gilts. In conclusion, there appeared to be little reproductive advantage of maintaining a lower TR during HS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29788126      PMCID: PMC6095284          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Seasonal and management effects on fertility of the sow: a descriptive study.

Authors:  O A Peltoniemi; R J Love; M Heinonen; V Tuovinen; H Saloniemi
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  1999-02-12       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Identification of sow-specific risk factors for late pregnancy loss during the seasonal infertility period in pigs.

Authors:  M Bertoldo; C G Grupen; P C Thomson; G Evans; P K Holyoake
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Effect of light regimen under various ambient temperatures on sow and litter performance.

Authors:  A Prunier; J Y Dourmad; M Etienne
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Seasonal influence on estrous activity in sows and gilts.

Authors:  J P Hurtgen; A D Leman; B Crabo
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1980-01-15       Impact factor: 1.936

5.  Seasonal influence on the fertility of sows and gilts.

Authors:  J P Hurtgen; A D Leman
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1980-10-01       Impact factor: 1.936

6.  Relevance of ovarian follicular development to the seasonal impairment of fertility in weaned sows.

Authors:  Tania P Lopes; Jonatan Sanchez-Osorio; Alfonso Bolarin; Emilio A Martinez; Jordi Roca
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Developmental changes in embryonic resistance to adverse effects of maternal heat stress in cows.

Authors:  A D Ealy; M Drost; P J Hansen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  Seasonal effects on fertility in gilts and sows.

Authors:  R J Love; G Evans; C Klupiec
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1993

9.  Multiple manifestations of season on reproductive performance of commercial swine.

Authors:  J L Xue; G D Dial; W E Marsh; P R Davies
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Gestational heat stress alters postnatal offspring body composition indices and metabolic parameters in pigs.

Authors:  Rebecca L Boddicker; Jacob T Seibert; Jay S Johnson; Sarah C Pearce; Joshua T Selsby; Nicholas K Gabler; Matthew C Lucy; Timothy J Safranski; Robert P Rhoads; Lance H Baumgard; Jason W Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of the acute heat stress response in gilts: III. Genome-wide association studies of thermotolerance traits in pigs.

Authors:  Kwan-Suk Kim; Jacob T Seibert; Zewde Edea; Kody L Graves; Eui-Soo Kim; Aileen F Keating; Lance H Baumgard; Jason W Ross; Max F Rothschild
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Characterizing the acute heat stress response in gilts: I. Thermoregulatory and production variables.

Authors:  J T Seibert; K L Graves; B J Hale; A F Keating; L H Baumgard; J W Ross
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.