Eva Györi1, Christopher Przestrzelski1, Igor Pona1, Michael Hagmann2, Thomas Rath1, Christine Radtke1, C-H John Tzou3. 1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria. 2. Section for Medical Statistics, CeMSIIS, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria. 3. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior Vienna (Krankenhaus Goettlicher Heiland), Dornbacher Strasse 20-28, 1170 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: science@tzou.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Facial palsy leads to functional and aesthetic deficits, which impair the quality of life of affected patients. General health-related and disease-specific questionnaires are available for quality of life assessment. In this study, observer-based analysis of facial function (Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale) was compared patient-based to facial palsy-specific gradings (Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale and Facial Disability Index), and general health-related quality of life questionnaires (SF-36). We hypothesized that only facial palsy-specific instruments capture functional and social impairments of affected patients. METHODS: Thirty facial palsy patients treated at a tertiary referral centre were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were unilateral facial palsy with stable facial function, age over 18 years and fluency in German. Facial function was assessed with general and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures and subsequently evaluated by the treating facial plastic surgeon. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for all assessed measurements. Correlations were calculated to compare general and facial palsy-specific instruments, as well as observer-based grading. RESULTS: Observer-based evaluation of facial function correlated well to the patients-based assessment of physical function, however social subscores did not correlate demonstrating the limited correlation of patient distress and facial nerve impairment. Physical function scores of disease-specific instruments did not correlate with general health assessment scores, while social function scores showed moderate to good correlations. CONCLUSION: Validated disease-specific instruments are essential for the assessment of facial palsy patients. Patient-reported outcome measures like the FaCE Scale and the Facial Disability Index should be applied in addition to standardized observer-based ratings to capture the patients' perspective on functional and social impairments associated with facial palsy to fully assess the burden of disease.
BACKGROUND:Facial palsy leads to functional and aesthetic deficits, which impair the quality of life of affected patients. General health-related and disease-specific questionnaires are available for quality of life assessment. In this study, observer-based analysis of facial function (Sunnybrook Facial Grading Scale) was compared patient-based to facial palsy-specific gradings (Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale and Facial Disability Index), and general health-related quality of life questionnaires (SF-36). We hypothesized that only facial palsy-specific instruments capture functional and social impairments of affected patients. METHODS: Thirty facial palsypatients treated at a tertiary referral centre were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were unilateral facial palsy with stable facial function, age over 18 years and fluency in German. Facial function was assessed with general and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures and subsequently evaluated by the treating facial plastic surgeon. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics for all assessed measurements. Correlations were calculated to compare general and facial palsy-specific instruments, as well as observer-based grading. RESULTS: Observer-based evaluation of facial function correlated well to the patients-based assessment of physical function, however social subscores did not correlate demonstrating the limited correlation of patient distress and facial nerve impairment. Physical function scores of disease-specific instruments did not correlate with general health assessment scores, while social function scores showed moderate to good correlations. CONCLUSION: Validated disease-specific instruments are essential for the assessment of facial palsypatients. Patient-reported outcome measures like the FaCE Scale and the Facial Disability Index should be applied in addition to standardized observer-based ratings to capture the patients' perspective on functional and social impairments associated with facial palsy to fully assess the burden of disease.