| Literature DB >> 29787716 |
Fang Yan1, Jingcai Lü2, Baolin Zhang3, Zhiyong Yuan1, Haipeng Zhao4, Song Huang5, Gang Wei6, Xue Mi3, Dahu Zou5, Wei Xu3, Shu Chen7, Jie Wang8, Feng Xie8, Minyao Wu9, Hanbin Xiao10, Zhiqiang Liang11, Jieqiong Jin1, Shifang Wu1, CunShuan Xu12, Benjamin Tapley7, Samuel T Turvey7, Theodore J Papenfuss13, Andrew A Cunningham7, Robert W Murphy14, Yaping Zhang15, Jing Che16.
Abstract
Overexploitation, habitat destruction, human-driven climate change and disease spread are resulting in the extinction of innumerable species, with amphibians being hit harder than most other groups [1]. Few species of amphibians are widespread, and those that are often represent complexes of multiple cryptic species. This is especially true for range-restricted salamanders [2]. Here, we used the widespread and critically endangered Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus) to show how genetically uninformed management efforts can negatively affect species conservation. We find that this salamander consists of at least five species-level lineages. However, the extensive recent translocation of individuals between farms, where the vast majority of extant salamanders now live, has resulted in genetic homogenization. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes from northern China now predominate in farms. Unfortunately, hybrid offspring are being released back into the wild under well-intentioned, but misguided, conservation management. Our findings emphasize the necessity of genetic assessments for seemingly well-known, widespread species in conservation initiatives. Species serve as the primary unit for protection and management in conservation actions [3], so determining the taxonomic status of threatened species is a major concern, especially for amphibians. The level of threat to amphibians may be underestimated, and existing conservation strategies may be inadvertently harmful if conducted without genetic assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29787716 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Biol ISSN: 0960-9822 Impact factor: 10.834