| Literature DB >> 29787583 |
Gerard McMahon1,2, Christopher I Morse2, Keith Winwood2, Adrian Burden2, Gladys L Onambélé2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the relative changes in muscle-tendon complex (MTC) properties following high load resistance training (RT) in young males and females, and determine any link with circulating TGFβ-1 and IGF-I levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29787583 PMCID: PMC5963774 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline and post-training values for muscle-tendon complex properties and circulating growth factors in each gender.
| Measure | Males ( | Females ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post-training | Change % | Baseline | Post-training | Change | |
| 71±4 | 87±7 | 24±9 | 40±3 | 52±5 | 30±10 | |
| 223±25 | 254±10 | 26±18 | 145±11 | 177±10 | 25±6 | |
| 5.91±0.42 | 6.35±0.45 | 8±4 | 4.10±0.24 | 4.38±0.32 | 6±2 | |
| 1132±104 | 1517±138 | 35±4 | 619±72 | 887±108 | 46±11 | |
| 0.78±0.06 | 0.99±0.09 | 27±4 | 0.42±0.04 | 0.60±0.08 | 46±16 | |
| 5663±1524 | 4310±1248 | -17±13 | 4716±1691 | 5276±2448 | 20±20 | |
| 392±90 | 431±26 | 13±9 | 380±24 | 460±42 | 23±9 | |
* Significant difference compared to baseline (p<0.05)
** (p<0.01). Data are Mean ± S.E.M. pCSA; Vastus Lateralis physiological Cross-sectional area, T Vol; Patella Tendon Volume, PT K; Patella Tendon Stiffness, PT E; Patella Tendon Modulus.
Fig 1Relative changes in patella tendon stiffness (K) at each force level of the force-elongation curve.
Males (black bars) and females (white bars) following training. * Significant difference (P<0.05) between sex. Data are Mean ± SEM.
Differential gender associations between circulating TBG-β, IGF-I and Tendon K.
| %MVC | TGFβ-1 at Wk0 | TGFβ-1 at Wk8 | IGF-I at Wk0 | IGF-I at Wk8 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | P | M | F | P | M | F | P | M | F | P | ||
| 10% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 20% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 30% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 40% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 50% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 60% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 70% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 80% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 90% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| 100% | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
| Average K | Baseline K | ||||||||||||
| Week 8 K | |||||||||||||
| Δ K | |||||||||||||
Grey filled box denotes significant (p<0.05) correlation between circulating hormone level and force level variable in pooled (P), male (M) and female (F) populations. Δ (delta) K, change in stiffness.
Fig 2Normalized change in tendon stiffness to the mean stiffness change following training.
Males (black filled diamonds) and females (white filled squares).