BACKGROUND: Physiologic changes in the elderly lead to higher morbidity and mortality after injury. Increasing level of trauma activation has been proposed to improve geriatric outcomes, but the increased cost to the patient and stress to the hospital system are significant downsides. The purpose of this study was to identify the age at which an increase in activation status is beneficial. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients 70 years or older from October 1, 2011, to October 1, 2016, was performed. On October 1, 2013, a policy change increased the activation criteria to the highest level for patients 70 years or older with a significant mechanism of injury. Patients who presented prior to (PRE) were compared with those after the change (POST). Data collected included age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. Primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcome was LOS. Multivariable regressions controlled for age, ISS, injury mechanism, and number of complications. RESULTS: A total of 4,341 patients met the inclusion criteria, 1,919 in PRE and 2,422 in POST. Mean age was 80.4 and 81 years in PRE and POST groups, respectively (p = 0.0155). Mean ISS values were 11.6 and 12.4 (p < 0.0001) for the PRE and POST groups. POST had more Level 1 activations (696 vs. 220, p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, ISS, mechanism of injury, and number of complications, mortality was significantly reduced in the POST group 77 years or older (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.87) (Fig. 1). Hospital LOS was significantly reduced in the POST group age 78 years or older (regression coefficient, -0.55; 95% confidence interval, -1.09 to -0.01) (Fig. 2). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests geriatric trauma patients 77 years or older benefit from the highest level of trauma activation with shorter LOS and lower mortality. A focused approach to increasing activation level for elderly patients may decrease patient cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV.
BACKGROUND: Physiologic changes in the elderly lead to higher morbidity and mortality after injury. Increasing level of trauma activation has been proposed to improve geriatric outcomes, but the increased cost to the patient and stress to the hospital system are significant downsides. The purpose of this study was to identify the age at which an increase in activation status is beneficial. METHODS: A retrospective review of traumapatients 70 years or older from October 1, 2011, to October 1, 2016, was performed. On October 1, 2013, a policy change increased the activation criteria to the highest level for patients 70 years or older with a significant mechanism of injury. Patients who presented prior to (PRE) were compared with those after the change (POST). Data collected included age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. Primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcome was LOS. Multivariable regressions controlled for age, ISS, injury mechanism, and number of complications. RESULTS: A total of 4,341 patients met the inclusion criteria, 1,919 in PRE and 2,422 in POST. Mean age was 80.4 and 81 years in PRE and POST groups, respectively (p = 0.0155). Mean ISS values were 11.6 and 12.4 (p < 0.0001) for the PRE and POST groups. POST had more Level 1 activations (696 vs. 220, p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, ISS, mechanism of injury, and number of complications, mortality was significantly reduced in the POST group 77 years or older (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.87) (Fig. 1). Hospital LOS was significantly reduced in the POST group age 78 years or older (regression coefficient, -0.55; 95% confidence interval, -1.09 to -0.01) (Fig. 2). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests geriatric traumapatients 77 years or older benefit from the highest level of trauma activation with shorter LOS and lower mortality. A focused approach to increasing activation level for elderly patients may decrease patient cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, level IV.
Authors: Imad S Dandan; Gail T Tominaga; Frank Z Zhao; Kathryn B Schaffer; Fady S Nasrallah; Melanie Gawlik; Dunya Bayat; Tala H Dandan; Walter L Biffl Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-04-28