Literature DB >> 29787416

Cecal Ligation and Puncture Alters Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression.

Mabel N Abraham1,2, Daniela M Jimenez1,2, Tiago D Fernandes1,2, Clifford S Deutschman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Interventional trials on glucocorticoids in sepsis have yielded capricious results. Recent studies have identified multiple glucocorticoid receptor isoforms. The relative abundance of these isoforms in septic patients and following murine cecal ligation and puncture is unknown. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of cecal ligation and puncture on glucocorticoid receptor isoform abundance.
DESIGN: Determination of effects of cecal ligation and puncture on glucocorticoid receptor isoform subtype abundance in C57BL/6 mice. Examination of glucocorticoid receptor isoform abundance in tissues harvested from patients immediately after death from sepsis or nonseptic critical illness.
SETTING: Research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: C57BL/6 mice and human tissue sections from recently deceased critically ill patients.
INTERVENTIONS: C57BL/6 mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture or sham operation. Abundance of the activating glucocorticoid receptor α and the inactivating glucocorticoid receptor β isoforms was determined in mouse and human tissue using immunoblotting. Cardiac output with or without stimulation with dexamethasone was assessed using echocardiography. The expression of the gene encoding the glucocorticoid-dependent enzyme glucose-6-phosphatase was identified using polymerase chain reaction. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using analysis of variance.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Results in baseline and sham operation mice were identical. At baseline, glucocorticoid receptor αA predominated in heart, lung, and skeletal muscle; abundance was decreased post cecal ligation and puncture. All glucocorticoid receptor α subtypes were identified in liver. Cecal ligation and puncture decreased the summed abundance of hepatic glucocorticoid receptor α subtypes and those of glucocorticoid receptors αA, B, and D. However, glucocorticoid receptor αC abundance was unchanged. Cecal ligation and puncture increased glucocorticoid receptor β protein abundance in the heart and lung. Relative to T0, cecal ligation and puncture decreased cardiac output and attenuated the cardiac output response to dexamethasone. Cecal ligation and puncture also decreased expression of glucose-6-phosphatase. Compared with nonseptic patients, human sepsis decreased the abundance of glucocorticoid receptor α and increased the abundance of glucocorticoid receptor β in heart and liver biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: Cecal ligation and puncture altered glucocorticoid receptor α and glucocorticoid receptor β isoform expression in tissues and decreased functional responses in heart and liver. Decreases in glucocorticoid receptor α and increases in glucocorticoid receptor β might explain the diminished glucocorticoid responsiveness observed in sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29787416     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  12 in total

1.  Angiotensin II enhances bacterial clearance via myeloid signaling in a murine sepsis model.

Authors:  Daniel E Leisman; Jamie R Privratsky; Jake R Lehman; Mabel N Abraham; Omar Y Yaipan; Mariana R Brewer; Ana Nedeljkovic-Kurepa; Christine C Capone; Tiago D Fernandes; Robert Griffiths; William J Stein; Marcia B Goldberg; Steven D Crowley; Rinaldo Bellomo; Clifford S Deutschman; Matthew D Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 2.  Adrenal function and dysfunction in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Arno Téblick; Bram Peeters; Lies Langouche; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 3.  The Glucocorticoid Receptor in Cardiovascular Health and Disease.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Tie-Ning Zhang; Jessica K Knight; Julie E Goodwin
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper: A Promising Marker for Monitoring and Treating Sepsis.

Authors:  Ya-Jun He; Ji-Qian Xu; Miao-Miao Sun; Xiang-Zhi Fang; Zhe-Kang Peng; Shang-Wen Pan; Ting Zhou; Ya-Xin Wang; You Shang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Sirt3 Maintains Microvascular Endothelial Adherens Junction Integrity to Alleviate Sepsis-Induced Lung Inflammation by Modulating the Interaction of VE-Cadherin and β-Catenin.

Authors:  Dan-Qian Chen; Mei-Jia Shen; Hui Wang; Yan Li; A-Ling Tang; Shan Li; Meng-Chen Xiong; Yan Guo; Guo-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Impaired angiotensin II type 1 receptor signaling contributes to sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Daniel E Leisman; Tiago D Fernandes; Vanesa Bijol; Mabel N Abraham; Jake R Lehman; Matthew D Taylor; Christine Capone; Omar Yaipan; Rinaldo Bellomo; Clifford S Deutschman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 7.  Sepsis as a Pan-Endocrine Illness-Endocrine Disorders in Septic Patients.

Authors:  Weronika Wasyluk; Martyna Wasyluk; Agnieszka Zwolak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  General Adaptation in Critical Illness: Glucocorticoid Receptor-alpha Master Regulator of Homeostatic Corrections.

Authors:  Gianfranco Umberto Meduri; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Impact of Hydrocortisone and of CRH Infusion on the Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Axis of Septic Male Mice.

Authors:  Arno Téblick; Lauren De Bruyn; Tim Van Oudenhove; Sarah Vander Perre; Lies Pauwels; Sarah Derde; Lies Langouche; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.736

10.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Basic/Translational Science Research Priorities.

Authors:  Clifford S Deutschman; Judith Hellman; Ricard Ferrer Roca; Daniel De Backer; Craig M Coopersmith
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 9.296

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.