BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard technique for assessing nutrition status in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD), we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of single-frequency (50 kHz) bioelectrical impedance analysis parameters, resistance/height (R/H), reactance/height (Xc/H), and impedance/height (Z/H), and their cutoff points for malnutrition. METHODS: The reference standards, Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Malnutrition Inflammation Score, and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, were performed at baseline and then once a year for 2 years. At least 2 assessments for each reference standard were performed during the monitoring period, and those patients who were assessed as malnourished on at least 2 consecutive occasions were classified as malnourished. RESULTS: A total 101 patients receiving HD were evaluated. R/H and Z/H demonstrated low to moderate accuracy to diagnose malnutrition in men and low accuracy in women, whereas the accuracy of Xc/H was uncertain. The cutoff points of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) parameters, determined based on the SGA to maximize sensitivity and specificity simultaneously, were: R/H ≥330.05 and ≥420.92 ohms/m for men and women, respectively; Z/H ≥332.71 and ≥423.19 ohms/m for men and women, respectively. In men, sensitivity based on the cutoff points of R/H and Z/H together ranged from 73% to 89% and specificity ranged from 49% to 50%. In women, sensitivity ranged from 58% to 80% and specificity from 48% to 55%. CONCLUSION: BIVA parameters demonstrated low to moderate accuracy in men and low accuracy in women for the diagnosis of malnutrition.
BACKGROUND: In the absence of a gold standard technique for assessing nutrition status in patients receiving hemodialysis (HD), we aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of single-frequency (50 kHz) bioelectrical impedance analysis parameters, resistance/height (R/H), reactance/height (Xc/H), and impedance/height (Z/H), and their cutoff points for malnutrition. METHODS: The reference standards, Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Malnutrition Inflammation Score, and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, were performed at baseline and then once a year for 2 years. At least 2 assessments for each reference standard were performed during the monitoring period, and those patients who were assessed as malnourished on at least 2 consecutive occasions were classified as malnourished. RESULTS: A total 101 patients receiving HD were evaluated. R/H and Z/H demonstrated low to moderate accuracy to diagnose malnutrition in men and low accuracy in women, whereas the accuracy of Xc/H was uncertain. The cutoff points of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) parameters, determined based on the SGA to maximize sensitivity and specificity simultaneously, were: R/H ≥330.05 and ≥420.92 ohms/m for men and women, respectively; Z/H ≥332.71 and ≥423.19 ohms/m for men and women, respectively. In men, sensitivity based on the cutoff points of R/H and Z/H together ranged from 73% to 89% and specificity ranged from 49% to 50%. In women, sensitivity ranged from 58% to 80% and specificity from 48% to 55%. CONCLUSION: BIVA parameters demonstrated low to moderate accuracy in men and low accuracy in women for the diagnosis of malnutrition.
Authors: Clara S A Sugizaki; Nayara P Queiroz; Débora M Silva; Ana T V S Freitas; Nara A Costa; Maria R G Peixoto Journal: J Bras Nefrol Date: 2022 Apr-Jun