Petra Popovics1,2, Renzhi Cai1,2, Wei Sha1,2, Ferenc G Rick2,3, Andrew V Schally1,2,4,5,6. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 2. Endocrine, Polypeptide and Cancer Institute, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida. 3. Department of Urology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International, University, Miami, Florida. 4. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 5. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida. 6. Department of Pathology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a key role in the etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through multiple pathways involving the stimulation of proliferation by cytokines and growth factors as well as the induction of the focal occurrence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We have previously reported that GHRH acts as a prostatic growth factor in experimental BPH and in autoimmune prostatitis models and its blockade with GHRH antagonists offer therapeutic approaches for these conditions. Our current study was aimed at the investigation of the beneficial effects of GHRH antagonists in λ-carrageenan-induced chronic prostatitis and at probing the downstream molecular pathways that are implicated in GHRH signaling. METHODS: To demonstrate the complications triggered by recurrent/chronic prostatic inflammation in Sprague-Dawley rats, 50 μL 3% carrageenan was injected into both ventral prostate lobes two times, 3 weeks apart. GHRH antagonist, MIA-690, was administered 5 days after the second intraprostatic injection at 20 μg daily dose for 4 weeks. GHRH-induced signaling events were identified in BPH-1 and in primary prostate epithelial (PrEp) cells at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min with Western blot. RESULTS: Inflammation induced prostatic enlargement and increased the area of the stromal compartment whereas treatment with the GHRH antagonist significantly reduced these effects. This beneficial activity was consistent with a decrease in prostatic GHRH, inflammatory marker COX-2, growth factor IGF-1 and inflammatory and EMT marker TGF-β1 protein levels and the expression of multiple genes related to EMT. In vitro, GHRH stimulated multiple pathways involved in inflammation and growth in both BPH-1 and PrEp cells including NFκB p65, AKT, ERK1/2, EGFR, STAT3 and increased the levels of TGF-β1 and Snail/Slug. Most interestingly, GHRH also stimulated the transactivation of the IGF receptor. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that GHRH antagonists could be beneficial for the treatment of prostatic inflammation and BPH in part by inhibiting the growth-promoting and inflammatory effects of locally produced GHRH.
BACKGROUND:Inflammation plays a key role in the etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) through multiple pathways involving the stimulation of proliferation by cytokines and growth factors as well as the induction of the focal occurrence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We have previously reported that GHRH acts as a prostatic growth factor in experimental BPH and in autoimmune prostatitis models and its blockade with GHRH antagonists offer therapeutic approaches for these conditions. Our current study was aimed at the investigation of the beneficial effects of GHRH antagonists in λ-carrageenan-induced chronic prostatitis and at probing the downstream molecular pathways that are implicated in GHRH signaling. METHODS: To demonstrate the complications triggered by recurrent/chronic prostatic inflammation in Sprague-Dawley rats, 50 μL 3% carrageenan was injected into both ventral prostate lobes two times, 3 weeks apart. GHRH antagonist, MIA-690, was administered 5 days after the second intraprostatic injection at 20 μg daily dose for 4 weeks. GHRH-induced signaling events were identified in BPH-1 and in primary prostate epithelial (PrEp) cells at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min with Western blot. RESULTS:Inflammation induced prostatic enlargement and increased the area of the stromal compartment whereas treatment with the GHRH antagonist significantly reduced these effects. This beneficial activity was consistent with a decrease in prostatic GHRH, inflammatory marker COX-2, growth factor IGF-1 and inflammatory and EMT marker TGF-β1 protein levels and the expression of multiple genes related to EMT. In vitro, GHRH stimulated multiple pathways involved in inflammation and growth in both BPH-1 and PrEp cells including NFκB p65, AKT, ERK1/2, EGFR, STAT3 and increased the levels of TGF-β1 and Snail/Slug. Most interestingly, GHRH also stimulated the transactivation of the IGF receptor. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that GHRH antagonists could be beneficial for the treatment of prostatic inflammation and BPH in part by inhibiting the growth-promoting and inflammatory effects of locally produced GHRH.
Authors: Petra Popovics; Wisam N Awadallah; Sarah E Kohrt; Thomas C Case; Nicole L Miller; Emily A Ricke; Wei Huang; Marisol Ramirez-Solano; Qi Liu; Chad M Vezina; Robert J Matusik; William A Ricke; Magdalena M Grabowska Journal: Prostate Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Mohammad A Uddin; Mohammad S Akhter; Sitanshu S Singh; Khadeja-Tul Kubra; Andrew V Schally; Seetharama Jois; Nektarios Barabutis Journal: Tissue Barriers Date: 2019-10-03
Authors: Laura E Pascal; Shinsuke Mizoguchi; Wei Chen; Lora H Rigatti; Taro Igarashi; Rajiv Dhir; Pradeep Tyagi; Zeyu Wu; Zhenyu Yang; William C de Groat; Donald B DeFranco; Naoki Yoshimura; Zhou Wang Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 5.051