Literature DB >> 29786861

Temporally feathered intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A planning technique to reduce normal tissue toxicity.

Juan Carlos López Alfonso1, Shireen Parsai2, Nikhil Joshi2, Andrew Godley2, Chirag Shah2, Shlomo A Koyfman2, Jimmy J Caudell3, Clifton D Fuller4, Heiko Enderling3,5, Jacob G Scott2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has allowed optimization of three-dimensional spatial radiation dose distributions permitting target coverage while reducing normal tissue toxicity. However, radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity is a major contributor to patients' quality of life and often a dose-limiting factor in the definitive treatment of cancer with radiation therapy. We propose the next logical step in the evolution of IMRT using canonical radiobiological principles, optimizing the temporal dimension through which radiation therapy is delivered to further reduce radiation-induced toxicity by increased time for normal tissue recovery. We term this novel treatment planning strategy "temporally feathered radiation therapy" (TFRT).
METHODS: Temporally feathered radiotherapy plans were generated as a composite of five simulated treatment plans each with altered constraints on particular hypothetical organs at risk (OARs) to be delivered sequentially. For each of these TFRT plans, OARs chosen for feathering receive higher doses while the remaining OARs receive lower doses than the standard fractional dose delivered in a conventional fractionated IMRT plan. Each TFRT plan is delivered a specific weekday, which in effect leads to a higher dose once weekly followed by four lower fractional doses to each temporally feathered OAR. We compared normal tissue toxicity between TFRT and conventional fractionated IMRT plans by using a dynamical mathematical model to describe radiation-induced tissue damage and repair over time.
RESULTS: Model-based simulations of TFRT demonstrated potential for reduced normal tissue toxicity compared to conventionally planned IMRT. The sequencing of high and low fractional doses delivered to OARs by TFRT plans suggested increased normal tissue recovery, and hence less overall radiation-induced toxicity, despite higher total doses delivered to OARs compared to conventional fractionated IMRT plans. The magnitude of toxicity reduction by TFRT planning was found to depend on the corresponding standard fractional dose of IMRT and organ-specific recovery rate of sublethal radiation-induced damage.
CONCLUSIONS: TFRT is a novel technique for treatment planning and optimization of therapeutic radiotherapy that considers the nonlinear aspects of normal tissue repair to optimize toxicity profiles. Model-based simulations of TFRT to carefully conceptualized clinical cases have demonstrated potential for radiation-induced toxicity reduction in a previously described dynamical model of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dosimetry planning; normal tissue complication probability; normal tissue toxicity reduction; temporally feathered radiation therapy; therapeutic ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29786861      PMCID: PMC6041138          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  28 in total

1.  Generalization of a model of tissue response to radiation based on the idea of functional subunits and binomial statistics.

Authors:  P Stavrev; N Stavreva; A Niemierko; M Goitein
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Fowler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Optimization of stationary and moving beam radiation therapy techniques.

Authors:  A Brahme
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Modeling of normal tissue response to radiation: the critical volume model.

Authors:  A Niemierko; M Goitein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators.

Authors:  T R Bortfeld; D L Kahler; T J Waldron; A L Boyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A genome-based model for adjusting radiotherapy dose (GARD): a retrospective, cohort-based study.

Authors:  Jacob G Scott; Anders Berglund; Michael J Schell; Ivaylo Mihaylov; William J Fulp; Binglin Yue; Eric Welsh; Jimmy J Caudell; Kamran Ahmed; Tobin S Strom; Eric Mellon; Puja Venkat; Peter Johnstone; John Foekens; Jae Lee; Eduardo Moros; William S Dalton; Steven A Eschrich; Howard McLeod; Louis B Harrison; Javier F Torres-Roca
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Loss of biological effect in prolonged fraction delivery.

Authors:  Jack F Fowler; James S Welsh; Steven P Howard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A dose-volume histogram based decision-support system for dosimetric comparison of radiotherapy treatment plans.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; M A Herrero; L Núñez
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Why one-size-fits-all vaso-modulatory interventions fail to control glioma invasion: in silico insights.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; A Köhn-Luque; T Stylianopoulos; F Feuerhake; A Deutsch; H Hatzikirou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A proliferation saturation index to predict radiation response and personalize radiotherapy fractionation.

Authors:  Sotiris Prokopiou; Eduardo G Moros; Jan Poleszczuk; Jimmy Caudell; Javier F Torres-Roca; Kujtim Latifi; Jae K Lee; Robert Myerson; Louis B Harrison; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predictive Radiation Oncology - A New NCI-DOE Scientific Space and Community.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; David A Jaffray; Demba Ba; Lynn L Borkon; Christine Chalk; Caroline Chung; Matthew A Coleman; C Norman Coleman; Maximilian Diehn; Kelvin K Droegemeier; Heiko Enderling; Michael G Espey; Emily J Greenspan; Christopher M Hartshorn; Thuc Hoang; H Timothy Hsiao; Cynthia Keppel; Nathan W Moore; Fred Prior; Eric A Stahlberg; Georgia Tourassi; Karen E Willcox
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Mathematical Modeling to Simulate the Effect of Adding Radiation Therapy to Immunotherapy and Application to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wonmo Sung; Theodore S Hong; Mark C Poznansky; Harald Paganetti; Clemens Grassberger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 8.013

Review 3.  Organoids as Complex In Vitro Models for Studying Radiation-Induced Cell Recruitment.

Authors:  Benjamin C Hacker; Marjan Rafat
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 4.  A Century of Fractionated Radiotherapy: How Mathematical Oncology Can Break the Rules.

Authors:  Nima Ghaderi; Joseph Jung; Sarah C Brüningk; Ajay Subramanian; Lauren Nassour; Jeffrey Peacock
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Mathematical modeling of radiotherapy and its impact on tumor interactions with the immune system.

Authors:  Rebecca Anne Bekker; Sungjune Kim; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.218

6.  Technical Note: A step-by-step guide to Temporally Feathered Radiation Therapy planning for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Shireen Parsai; Richard L J Qiu; Peng Qi; Juan C L Alfonso; Jeremy Donaghue; Eric Murray; David Majkszak; Nicole Dorio; Clifton D Fuller; Kristy Brock; Shlomo Koyfman; Neil Woody; Nikhil Joshi; Jacob G Scott
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.