Literature DB >> 29786276

[COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FIXATION WITH PERCUTANEOUS CANNULATED SCREWS ASSISTED BY ROBOT NAVIGATION AND CONVENTIONAL SURGERY WITH MANUAL POSITIONING FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES].

Yi Tong1, Xiaozhong Luo1, Gang Wu1, Weixiang Shi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and the advantage of fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws assisted by robot navigation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures by comparing with the conventional surgery.
METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2014, 20 patients with femoral neck fracture were treated by internal fixation with percutaneous cannulated screws assisted by robot navigation (navigation group), another 18 patients undergoing conventional surgery with manual positioning were chosen as the control group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, the injury side, time from injury to operation, and the classification of fractures between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, X-ray fluoroscopy time, blood loss, frequency of guide pin insertion, and healing time were recorded. At 1 week after operation, the parallel degree of screws was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films; the Harris score was used to evaluate the hip function.
RESULTS: All incisions of 2?groups healed by first intention after operation. There was no significant difference in operation time between 2?groups (t= -1.139, P=0.262). The blood loss, frequency of guide pin insertion, and X-ray fluoroscopy time of navigation group were significantly less than those of control group (P < 0.05). There were 2 screws penetrating into the joint cavity in control group. The patients were followed up 12-24 months with an average of 18 months. The navigation group got significantly better parallel degree of screws than control group on the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films (t=25.021, P=0.000; t=18.659, P=0.000). Fractures healed in all patients of navigation group (100%), and the healing time was (21.8±2.8) weeks; fracture healed in 16 patients of control group (88.9%), and the healing time was (24.0 ± 3.7) weeks. There was no significant difference in healing rate and healing time between 2 groups (χ2=2.346, P=0.126; t=1.990, P=0.055). The Harris score of navigation group (87.1±3.7) was significantly higher than that of control group (79.3±4.7) at last follow-up (t= -5.689, P=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Cannulated screw fixation assisted by robot navigation is a good method to treat femoral neck fractures, which has the advantages of more accurate positioning, better hip function recovery, less surgical trauma, and shorter X-ray exposure time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cannulated screw; Femoral neck fracture; Internal fixation; Robot navigation

Year:  2016        PMID: 29786276     DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.20160139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  3 in total

Review 1.  Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Freehand Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Screw Fixation in Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdulrahman O Al-Naseem; Ahmed R Gonnah; Hussain Al-Ali; Abdulaziz O Al-Naseem; Irfan Siddique
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Technology of percutaneous cannulated screw implantation using screw view model of navigation in Garden type I of femoral neck fracture: A case report.

Authors:  Tong Yu; Bao-Ming Yuan; Xi-Wen Zhang; Dong-Sheng Wang; Yi-Kun Jiang; Rong-Peng Dong; Ming-Yang Kang; Xin Zhao; Jian-Wu Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Computer-assisted cannulated screw internal fixation versus conventional cannulated screw internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing-Hao Cheng; Peng-Biao Li; Ting-Ting Lu; Shi-Fang Guo; Wen-Fei Di; Ke-Hu Yang; Yao-Wen Qian
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.