Literature DB >> 29785498

Survival of Planktonic and Sessile Cells of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus reuteri upon Exposure to Simulated Fasting-State Gastrointestinal Conditions.

Kyle B Klopper1, Elanna Bester1, Shelly M Deane1, Gideon M Wolfaardt1,2, Leon M T Dicks3.   

Abstract

In this study, we report on the formation and resilience of Lactobacillus reuteri HFI-LD5 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus HFI-K2 biofilms cultivated in a CO2 evolution measurement system (CEMS) and exposed to biologically relevant, fasting-state gastrointestinal fluids under continuous flow conditions. For comparative purposes, planktonic and sessile populations of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 and L. rhamnosus HFI-K2 were each exposed to fasting-state gastric fluid (FSGF, pH 2.0) for 2 h, fasting-state intestinal fluid (FSIF, pH 7.5) for 6 h, and simulated colonic fluid (SCoF, pH 7.0) for 24 h. Planktonic cell numbers of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 declined from 6.6 log10 CFU/mL to 3.2 log10 CFU/mL and L. rhamnosus HFI-K2 from 6.6 log10 CFU/mL to undetectable levels after exposure to FSGF. Limited loss in viability was observed when free-floating cells were exposed to FSIF and SCoF. Sessile populations of both strains survived and recovered from the sequential exposure to all three gastric fluids despite observed detachment of biofilm biomass and a temporary decrease in metabolic activity to below detection limits, as recorded by changes in whole-biofilm CO2 production rates. The planktonic cell-focused gut microbiome-related research has most likely caused an underestimation in the overall survival ability of microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract. Sessile cells of L. reuteri HFI-LD5 were metabolically inactive when exposed to gastric (FSGF) and intestinal (FSIF) fluids, suggesting that biofilms are formed in the small intestinal tract as survival mechanism. In the case of L. rhamnosus HFI-K2, cells were released from biofilms when suddenly exposed to pH 2.0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilms; L. reuteri; L. rhamnosus; Simulated fasting-state gastrointestinal conditions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29785498     DOI: 10.1007/s12602-018-9426-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins        ISSN: 1867-1306            Impact factor:   4.609


  53 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics and gut health: a special focus on liver diseases.

Authors:  Silvia Wilson Gratz; Hannu Mykkanen; Hani S El-Nezami
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Burns, biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis.

Authors:  Peter Kennedy; Susan Brammah; Edward Wills
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 3.  Intestinal luminal pH in inflammatory bowel disease: possible determinants and implications for therapy with aminosalicylates and other drugs.

Authors:  S G Nugent; D Kumar; D S Rampton; D F Evans
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Oral Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 to reduce Group B Streptococcus colonization in pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ming Ho; Yin-Yi Chang; Wei-Chun Chang; Hung-Chih Lin; Mei-Hung Wang; Wu-Chou Lin; Tsan-Hung Chiu
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.705

5.  Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus reuteri.

Authors:  Donald A MacKenzie; Faye Jeffers; Mary L Parker; Amandine Vibert-Vallet; Roy J Bongaerts; Stefan Roos; Jens Walter; Nathalie Juge
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  A high-molecular-mass surface protein (Lsp) and methionine sulfoxide reductase B (MsrB) contribute to the ecological performance of Lactobacillus reuteri in the murine gut.

Authors:  Jens Walter; Patrice Chagnaud; Gerald W Tannock; Diane M Loach; Fabio Dal Bello; Howard F Jenkinson; Walter P Hammes; Christian Hertel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 on the ability of Candida albicans to infect cells and induce inflammation.

Authors:  Rafael C R Martinez; Shannon L Seney; Kelly L Summers; Auro Nomizo; Elaine C P De Martinis; Gregor Reid
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.955

8.  Bile stimulates cell surface hydrophobicity, Congo red binding and biofilm formation of Lactobacillus strains.

Authors:  Padma Ambalam; Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi; Ingrid Nilsson; Torkel Wadström; Åsa Ljungh
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 9.  Microbes inside--from diversity to function: the case of Akkermansia.

Authors:  Clara Belzer; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 10.  Towards a better understanding of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG--host interactions.

Authors:  Marijke E Segers; Sarah Lebeer
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biofilm dynamics: linking in situ biofilm biomass and metabolic activity measurements in real-time under continuous flow conditions.

Authors:  Kyle B Klopper; Riaan N de Witt; Elanna Bester; Leon M T Dicks; Gideon M Wolfaardt
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 7.290

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.