| Literature DB >> 29785348 |
Alexander Krek1, Viktor Krechik1, Aleksandr Danchenkov1,2, Elena Krek1.
Abstract
The detailed environmental survey of the coastal zone of the Kaliningrad Region northern coast was carried out. The pollutants distribution in the silty clay fraction and calculation of ecological indexes allowed the evaluation of distribution of potentially harmful elements (PHEs). The sources of pollution in the most intensively used areas were identified, and transit and accumulation zones were allocated. A large area of anomalous content of PHEs was revealed on the underwater coastal slope of the Curonian Spit National Park, which is situated far from the sources of pollution. The alongshore bed load transport provides the contamination of the underwater slope whereas the beaches are less exposed to pollution.Entities:
Keywords: Baltic Sea; Coastal zone; Heavy metals; Pollution indexes; Sediments
Year: 2018 PMID: 29785348 PMCID: PMC5960262 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Initial data map.
The ratio of PHEs content in the bottom sediments of the underwater coastal slope of the Sambia Peninsula and the Curonian Spit.
| Sambia Peninsula (points 1–17) | Curonian Spit (points 18–40) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. | Max. | Average | Min. | Max. | Average | |||
| Pollutant | mg/kg | mg/kg | ||||||
| Hg | <0.005 | 0.007 | <0.005 | – | <0.005 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Cd | <0.05 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.26 | <0.05 | 0.86 | 0.40 | 0.23 |
| Cu | 0.98 | 56 | 25.3 | 18.6 | 20 | 340 | 98.7 | 84.7 |
| Ni | 0.67 | 12 | 5.41 | 4.02 | <0.5 | 120 | 8.41 | 25.24 |
| Pb | <0.5 | 19 | 1.71 | 4.64 | <0.5 | 130 | 8.03 | 27.34 |
| Zn | 5.7 | 24 | 14.7 | 4.6 | 4 | 230 | 26.1 | 48.7 |
| OP | <40 | 120 | 52.6 | 36.3 | <40 | 1,380 | 151.8 | 305.4 |
The ratio of PHEs content on the beaches of Sambia Peninsula and the Curonian Spit.
| Sambia Peninsula | Curonian Spit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. | Max. | Average | Min. | Max. | Average | |||
| Pollutant | mg/kg | mg/kg | ||||||
| Hg | <0.005 | <0.005 | <0.005 | – | <0.005 | 0.008 | <0.005 | – |
| Cd | 0.08 | 0.54 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.061 | 0.39 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Cu | 0.88 | 89 | 21.2 | 24.4 | <0.5 | 45 | 9.0 | 11.9 |
| Ni | 0.86 | 4.2 | 1.83 | 0.72 | <0.5 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Pb | <0.5 | 3.5 | 0.95 | 0.84 | <0.5 | 5.8 | 0.96 | 1.24 |
| Zn | 2.1 | 190 | 19.8 | 44.2 | 1.4 | 8.1 | 4.4 | 2.0 |
| OP | <40 | 72 | <40 | – | <40 | 50 | <40 | – |
Figure 2Areas of potential PHEs sources and accumulation.
Average content of HM in the bottom sediments of the underwater coastal slope and their background values.
| The studied area | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min. | Max. | Mean | Polish coastal part | The territorial waters of Lithuania | ||
| Element | mg/kg | mg/kg | ||||
| Cd | <0.05 | 0.96 | 0.42 | 0.25 | 3.3 | 0.04 |
| Cu | 0.98 | 340 | 67.8 | 74.6 | 19.5 | 1.4 |
| Ni | <0.5 | 120 | 7.1 | 19.2 | 27 | 3.0 |
| Pb | <0.5 | 130 | 5.4 | 21.0 | 37.5 | 3.6 |
| Zn | 4 | 230 | 13.7 | 13.5 | 87 | 11.9 |
| Hg | <0.005 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.002 | <0.02 | |
Notes.
Szefer et al., 2009 (average by the points 10, 13, 14, 15. 25, 26, 28).
Belzunce Segarra et al, 2007 (at the point K-6)
Remeikaite-Nikiene et al., 2018 (the average for a shallow-water area from measurements at seven points).
Uścinowicz, 2011 (average for sands).
The ratio of PHEs content on the beaches of the Sambia Peninsula and the Curonian Spit in terms of silty clay fraction.
| Sambia Peninsula | Curonian Spit | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Average | Min | Max | Average | Median total for the coast | |||
| Pollutant | 102mg/kg | 102mg/kg | |||||||
| Hg | 0.001 | 0.083 | 0.009 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.008 | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Cd | 0.01 | 10.19 | 2.41 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 0.46 | 0.40 | 0.41 | |
| Cu | 1.70 | 868.9 | 95.59 | 205.5 | 9.9 | 401.7 | 105.2 | 50.6 | |
| Ni | 0.56 | 272.67 | 64.44 | 0.007 | 123.7 | 9.15 | 26.02 | 3.01 | |
| Pb | 0.10 | 50.06 | 16.09 | 0.1 | 213.72 | 11.16 | 45.28 | 0.53 | |
| Zn | 2.16 | 625.79 | 177.92 | 0.01 | 378.12 | 34.68 | 78.42 | 13.9 | |
| OP | 5.10 | 2,996.4 | 718.9 | 5.1 | 1,085.3 | 205.7 | 337.7 | 33.5 | |
Correlation matrix between the elements, reduced to the silty clay fraction.
High correlation is shown in bold.
| Hg | Cd | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | OP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hg | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.04 | −0.07 | −0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| Cd | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 | |||
| Cu | 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.20 | 0.55 | |||
| Ni | −0.07 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.23 | 0.55 | ||
| Pb | −0.03 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.42 |
| Zn | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 1.00 | 0.56 |
| OP | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.56 | 1.00 |
Figure 3Dendrogram obtained by cluster analysis of the sediment samples.
Indexes CF, mCd, PLI, and RI.
| CF | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point | Hg | Cd | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | OP | mCd | PLI | RI |
| 1 | 0.25 | 3.07 | 0.19 | 5.33 | 0.15 | |||||
| 2 | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 38 |
| 3 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 3.54 | 0.15 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.27 | 1.22 | 2.64 | 0.19 | 4.12 | 0.15 | 2.4 | 207 | ||
| 5 | 1.42 | 1.17 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.19 | 0.70 | 0.15 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 96 |
| 6 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 0.91 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 1.2 | 144 | |
| 7 | 0.27 | 1.06 | 0.06 | 0.82 | 0.19 | 0.69 | 0.15 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 44 |
| 8 | 0.27 | 1.53 | 0.91 | 5.42 | 1.80 | 3.16 | 2.2 | 73 | ||
| 9 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.14 | 1.70 | 0.42 | 2.11 | 0.8 | 131 | ||
| 10 | 0.27 | |||||||||
| 11 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 27 |
| 12 | 0.27 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 1.49 | 0.19 | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 25 |
| 13 | 0.27 | 3.24 | 1.86 | 0.19 | 2.64 | 3.23 | 2.7 | 121 | ||
| 14 | 0.27 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.31 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 16 |
| 17 | 3.09 | 1.00 | 5.78 | 0.19 | 4.54 | |||||
| 19 | 2.96 | 1.90 | 1.55 | 3.11 | 1.82 | 3.1 | ||||
| 20 | 0.27 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 47 |
| 21 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.39 | 0.83 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 36 |
| 22 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 1.09 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 20 |
| 23 | 0.54 | 0.16 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 33 |
| 24 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 66 |
| 25 | 2.09 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 1.46 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 112 |
| 26 | 3.19 | 1.52 | 1.08 | 1.87 | 4.25 | 3.5 | ||||
| 27 | 0.11 | 2.78 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.68 | 0.15 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 273 | |
| 28 | 3.96 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 2.88 | 2.05 | 2.8 | 232 | ||
| 29 | 0.26 | 4.93 | 1.55 | 0.19 | 3.65 | |||||
| 30 | 0.27 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 2.82 | 0.28 | 0.60 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 40 |
| 31 | 1.90 | 0.07 | 0.94 | 2.39 | 2.17 | 0.88 | 1.94 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 94 |
| 32 | 2.40 | 1.41 | 3.46 | 1.41 | 4.31 | 214 | ||||
| 33 | 4.40 | 2.69 | 2.34 | |||||||
| 34 | 0.62 | 0.50 | 1.61 | 0.87 | 3.61 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 66 |
| 35 | 3.45 | 1.00 | 2.33 | 2.87 | 0.56 | 32.41 | 3.0 | 219 | ||
| 36 | 2.41 | 1.83 | 0.19 | 4.24 | 25.90 | |||||
| 37 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 2.48 | 2.58 | 0.19 | 2.65 | 5.85 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 40 |
| 38 | 2.34 | 1.10 | 2.91 | 0.29 | 0.92 | 2.22 | 2.3 | 172 | ||
| 39 | 5.05 | 2.03 | 2.36 | 0.69 | 1.68 | 4.39 | 3.4 | |||
| 40 | 2.43 | 2.10 | 2.10 | 0.02 | 1.40 | 0.01 | 1.42 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 178 |
Notes.
A very high level of contamination is shown in bold, italics are high.
Figure 4Spatial distribution of the integral index mCd.