Nikolas H Kazmers1, Angela P Presson2, Yizhe Xu2, Abby Howenstein3, Andrew R Tyser3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: nikolas.kazmers@utah.edu. 2. Division of Public Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Pediatric Research Enterprise, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgical procedure, representing a financial burden to the health care system. The purpose of this study was to test whether the choice of CTR technique (open carpal tunnel release [OCTR] vs endoscopic carpal tunnel release [ECTR]), surgical setting (operating room vs procedure room [PR]), and anesthetic type (local, monitored anesthesia care [MAC], Bier block, general) affected costs or payments. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated unilateral CTR between July 2014, and October 2017, at a single academic medical center were identified. Patients undergoing ECTR converted to OCTR, revision surgery, or additional procedures were excluded. Using our institution's information technology value tools, we calculated total direct costs (TDCs), total combined payment (TCP), hospital payment, surgeon payment, and anesthesia payment for each surgical encounter. Cost data were normalized using each participant's surgical encounter cost divided by the average cost in the data set and compared across 8 groups (defined by surgery type, operation location, and anesthesia type). RESULTS: Of 479 included patients, the mean age was 55.3 ± 16.1 years, and 68% were female. Payer mix included commercial (45%), Medicare (37%), Medicaid (13%), workers' compensation (2%), self-pay (1%), and other (3%) insurance types. The TDC and TCP both differed significantly between each CTR group, and OCTR in the PR under local anesthesia was the lowest. The OCTR/local/operating room, OCTR/MAC/operating room, and ECTR/operating room, were associated with 6.3-fold, 11.0-fold, and 12.4-16.6-fold greater TDC than OCTR/local/PR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Performing OCTR under local anesthetic in the PR setting significantly minimizes direct surgical encounter costs relative to other surgical methods (ECTR), anesthetic methods (Bier block, MAC, general), and surgical settings (operating room). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study identifies modifiable factors that may lead to cost reductions for CTR surgery.
PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a common surgical procedure, representing a financial burden to the health care system. The purpose of this study was to test whether the choice of CTR technique (open carpal tunnel release [OCTR] vs endoscopic carpal tunnel release [ECTR]), surgical setting (operating room vs procedure room [PR]), and anesthetic type (local, monitored anesthesia care [MAC], Bier block, general) affected costs or payments. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing isolated unilateral CTR between July 2014, and October 2017, at a single academic medical center were identified. Patients undergoing ECTR converted to OCTR, revision surgery, or additional procedures were excluded. Using our institution's information technology value tools, we calculated total direct costs (TDCs), total combined payment (TCP), hospital payment, surgeon payment, and anesthesia payment for each surgical encounter. Cost data were normalized using each participant's surgical encounter cost divided by the average cost in the data set and compared across 8 groups (defined by surgery type, operation location, and anesthesia type). RESULTS: Of 479 included patients, the mean age was 55.3 ± 16.1 years, and 68% were female. Payer mix included commercial (45%), Medicare (37%), Medicaid (13%), workers' compensation (2%), self-pay (1%), and other (3%) insurance types. The TDC and TCP both differed significantly between each CTR group, and OCTR in the PR under local anesthesia was the lowest. The OCTR/local/operating room, OCTR/MAC/operating room, and ECTR/operating room, were associated with 6.3-fold, 11.0-fold, and 12.4-16.6-fold greater TDC than OCTR/local/PR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Performing OCTR under local anesthetic in the PR setting significantly minimizes direct surgical encounter costs relative to other surgical methods (ECTR), anesthetic methods (Bier block, MAC, general), and surgical settings (operating room). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study identifies modifiable factors that may lead to cost reductions for CTR surgery.
Authors: Abhishek Chatterjee; James E McCarthy; Shirley A Montagne; Kenneth Leong; Carolyn L Kerrigan Journal: Ann Plast Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.539
Authors: Martin R Leblanc; Donald H Lalonde; Achilleas Thoma; Mike Bell; Neil Wells; Murray Allen; Peter Chang; Daniel McKee; Jan Lalonde Journal: Hand (N Y) Date: 2010-11-18
Authors: Steven Zhang; Molly Vora; Alex H S Harris; Laurence Baker; Catherine Curtin; Robin N Kamal Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kensaku Kawamoto; Cary J Martin; Kip Williams; Ming-Chieh Tu; Charlton G Park; Cheri Hunter; Catherine J Staes; Bruce E Bray; Vikrant G Deshmukh; Reid A Holbrook; Scott J Morris; Matthew B Fedderson; Amy Sletta; James Turnbull; Sean J Mulvihill; Gordon L Crabtree; David E Entwistle; Quinn L McKenna; Michael B Strong; Robert C Pendleton; Vivian S Lee Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jesse N Steadman; Andrew R Stephens; Guo Wei; Angela P Presson; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Jesse N Steadman; Andrew R Stephens; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2022-02-05 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Miranda J Rogers; Andrew R Stephens; Minkyoung Yoo; Richard E Nelson; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Nikolas H Kazmers; Kate Peacock; Katelin B Nickel; Andrew R Stephens; Margaret Olsen; Andrew R Tyser Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Andrew R Stephens; Angela P Presson; Yeon J Jo; Andrew R Tyser; Angela A Wang; Douglas T Hutchinson; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Andrew R Stephens; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Brian Orleans; Mike Martin; Andrew R Tyser; Nikolas H Kazmers Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-04-30