Literature DB >> 29783895

The use of an Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for major bone loss: minimum 2-year follow-up.

David C Kieser1, Ramez Ailabouni1, Sandra C J Kieser2, Michael C Wyatt1, Paul C Armour1, Mark H Coates2, Gary J Hooper1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Custom 3D-printed acetabular implants are a new technology used in hip surgery with ever-increasing frequency. They offer patient-specific implants to optimise filling of bone defects and implant-bone contact, without the need for excessive bone resection.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 46 consecutive patients who underwent an Ossis unilateral custom 3D-printed acetabular implant. Clinical (Oxford Hip Score OHS-60), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Harris Hip Score (HHS) and radiological (restoration of biomechanical hip centre, osteointegration, wear, heterotrophic ossification) results were assessed.
RESULTS: Patient mean age was 68 years and follow-up was 38 months (minimum 24 months). 10 patients were excluded from the outcome analysis; 2 patients died, 1 required revision for deep infection and 7 were lost to follow-up. Of the 36 patients included, 21 had severe osteolysis. 7 were revised for infection, 3 for tumoural defects, 3 for metallosis, 1 for dysplasia and 1 for trauma (Paprosky 2a [n=6], 2b [n=2], 2c [n=5], 3a [n=6], 3b [n=11], pelvic dissociation [n=6]). OHS significantly improved postoperatively (16-8-48.4 p=0.027). Postoperative functional scores were good (WOMAC 98; HHS 79). The biomechanical hip centre was restored in all patients. 1 patient had early implant migration with subsequent stabilisation. 2 patients had radiographs concerning for failure of osteointegration. 1 patient had recurrent dislocations.
CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term results of the Ossis custom 3D-printed tri-flanged acetabular implant for the management of severe acetabular defects are encouraging. The improvement in functional scores and radiographic outcomes are comparable to similar designs. In addition, no cases have required revision for aseptic loosening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D print; Acetabular bone loss; custom; osteolysis; pelvic dissociation; tri-flanged

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29783895     DOI: 10.1177/1120700018760817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  9 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the previously irradiated pelvis: a review of basic science and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  John Patrick Connors; Patrick Garvin; Jacob Silver; Adam Lindsay; Olga Solovyova
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  [Use of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) as part of a two-stage procedure in patients with severe periacetabular bone loss].

Authors:  Frank Sebastian Fröschen; Thomas Martin Randau; Sebastian Gottfried Walter; Franz Dally; Dieter Christian Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 1.286

3.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

4.  3D Printed Acetabular Components for Complex Revision Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Angela Yao; Daniel Mark George; Vijai Ranawat; Chris John Wilson
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Novel Aptamer-Functionalized Nanoparticles Enhances Bone Defect Repair By Improving Stem Cell Recruitment.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Haibin Wu; Qiao Li; Ying Yang; Fengyu Che; Guoxia Wang; Liyu Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-11-06

Review 6.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Timothy Wright; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Alexander Gu; Mathias Bostrom; Fares Haddad; Seth Jerabek; Michael Bolognesi; Thomas Fehring; Alejandro Gonzalez DellaValle; William Jiranek; William Walter; Wayne Paprosky; Donald Garbuz; Thomas Sculco
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-09-28

7.  A novel revision system for complex pelvic defects utilizing 3D-printed custom prosthesis.

Authors:  Yongqiang Hao; Dinghao Luo; Junxiang Wu; Lei Wang; Kai Xie; Mengning Yan; Kerong Dai; Yongqiang Hao
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Application of 3D Printing in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Prasoon Kumar; Pulak Vatsya; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Aman Hooda; Mandeep S Dhillon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jiajun Lin; Fenyong Chen; Wenge Liu; Min Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.