| Literature DB >> 29783499 |
Michael Burgess1, Kieran O'Doherty2, David Secko3.
Abstract
In this article, we examine the role of deliberative democracy theory and practice as a means to enhance policy approaches to ethical and social issues related to biobanks. Biobanks are seen as a vital component in the rapid trend towards personalized medicine, which, while alluring, also face key issues relating to genetic discrimination, privacy, informed consent and a concern regarding how to develop and maintain the trust of citizens. We describe the case of a deliberative public engagement in which a diverse group of citizens deliberated on the appropriate values that should guide biobanking in British Columbia, Canada. We argue that the use of such methods is a necessity if we are to meaningfully consider diverse 'public interests' during the development of biobanks and thereby personalized medicine.Entities:
Keywords: biobanks; deliberative democracy; personalized medicine; public engagement
Year: 2008 PMID: 29783499 DOI: 10.2217/17410541.5.3.285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Per Med ISSN: 1741-0541 Impact factor: 2.512