OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound is widely regarded as an important adjunct to antenatal care (ANC) to guide practice and reduce perinatal mortality. We assessed the impact of ANC ultrasound use at health centres in resource-limited countries. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Clusters within five countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia) METHODS: Clusters were randomised to standard ANC or standard care plus two ultrasounds and referral for complications. The study trained providers in intervention clusters to perform basic obstetric ultrasounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, maternal near-miss mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. RESULTS: During the 24-month trial, 28 intervention and 28 control clusters had 24 263 and 23 160 births, respectively; 78% in the intervention clusters received at least one study ultrasound; 60% received two. The prevalence of conditions noted including twins, placenta previa, and abnormal lie was within expected ranges. 9% were referred for an ultrasound-diagnosed condition, and 71% attended the referral. The ANC (RR 1.0 95% CI 1.00, 1.01) and hospital delivery rates for complicated pregnancies (RR 1.03 95% CI 0.89, 1.20) did not differ between intervention and control clusters nor did the composite outcome (RR 1.09 95% CI 0.97, 1.23) or its individual components. CONCLUSIONS: Despite availability of ultrasound at ANC in the intervention clusters, neither ANC nor hospital delivery for complicated pregnancies increased. The composite outcome and the individual components were not reduced. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound is widely regarded as an important adjunct to antenatal care (ANC) to guide practice and reduce perinatal mortality. We assessed the impact of ANC ultrasound use at health centres in resource-limited countries. DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: Clusters within five countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia) METHODS: Clusters were randomised to standard ANC or standard care plus two ultrasounds and referral for complications. The study trained providers in intervention clusters to perform basic obstetric ultrasounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of maternal mortality, maternal near-miss mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. RESULTS: During the 24-month trial, 28 intervention and 28 control clusters had 24 263 and 23 160 births, respectively; 78% in the intervention clusters received at least one study ultrasound; 60% received two. The prevalence of conditions noted including twins, placenta previa, and abnormal lie was within expected ranges. 9% were referred for an ultrasound-diagnosed condition, and 71% attended the referral. The ANC (RR 1.0 95% CI 1.00, 1.01) and hospital delivery rates for complicated pregnancies (RR 1.03 95% CI 0.89, 1.20) did not differ between intervention and control clusters nor did the composite outcome (RR 1.09 95% CI 0.97, 1.23) or its individual components. CONCLUSIONS: Despite availability of ultrasound at ANC in the intervention clusters, neither ANC nor hospital delivery for complicated pregnancies increased. The composite outcome and the individual components were not reduced. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Antenatal care ultrasound did not improve a composite outcome that included maternal, fetal, and neonatal mortality.
Authors: L J Salomon; Z Alfirevic; V Berghella; C Bilardo; E Hernandez-Andrade; S L Johnsen; K Kalache; K-Y Leung; G Malinger; H Munoz; F Prefumo; A Toi; W Lee Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Robert Pattinson; Lale Say; João Paulo Souza; Nynke van den Broek; Cleone Rooney Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Christopher A Enakpene; Imran O Morhason-Bello; Anthony O Marinho; Babatunde O Adedokun; Adegoke O Kalejaiye; Kayode Sogo; Sikiru A Gbadamosi; Babatunde S Awoyinka; Obehi O Enabor Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: B W Bresnahan; E Vodicka; J B Babigumira; A M Malik; F Yego; A Lokangaka; B M Chitah; Z Bauer; H Chavez; J L Moore; L P Garrison; J O Swanson; D Swanson; E M McClure; R L Goldenberg; F Esamai; A L Garces; E Chomba; S Saleem; A Tshefu; C L Bose; M Bauserman; W Carlo; S Bucher; E A Liechty; R O Nathan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Holly L Franklin; Waseem Mirza; David L Swanson; Jamie E Newman; Robert L Goldenberg; David Muyodi; Lester Figueroa; Robert O Nathan; Jonathan O Swanson; Nicole Goldsmith; Nancy Kanaiza; Farnaz Naqvi; Irma Sayury Pineda; Walter López-Gomez; Dorothy Hamsumonde; Victor Lokomba Bolamba; Elizabeth V Fogleman; Sarah Saleem; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Elwyn Chomba; Musaku Mwenechanya; Waldemar A Carlo; Antoinette Tshefu; Adrien Lokangaka; Carl L Bose; Marion Koso-Thomas; Menachem Miodovnik; Elizabeth M McClure Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Claudia Hanson; Stephen Munjanja; Agnes Binagwaho; Bellington Vwalika; Andrea B Pembe; Elsa Jacinto; George K Chilinda; Kateri B Donahoe; Sikolia Z Wanyonyi; Peter Waiswa; Muchabayiwa F Gidiri; Lenka Benova Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 11.069