| Literature DB >> 29782606 |
Omar Alonso1,2, Gerardo Dos Santos1,2, Margarita García Fontes1, Henia Balter1, Henry Engler1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA versus 11C-Choline in men with prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence and to demonstrate the added value of a tri-modality PET/CT-MRI system.Entities:
Keywords: 11C-Choline; 68Ga-PSMA; Biochemical recurrence; PET/CT; PET/MRI; Prostate cancer
Year: 2018 PMID: 29782606 PMCID: PMC5954786 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-018-0027-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hybrid Imaging ISSN: 2510-3636
Patient characteristics and scan results
| P | A | T | PSA ( | 11C-C | 68G | MR ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | RT/HT | 8.7 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 2 | 61 | RT/HT | 10 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 3 | 55 | RT/HT | 93.85 | Positive | Positive | Negative |
| 4 | 60 | Surgery | 0.98 | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| 5 | 68 | RT/HT | 2.33 | Positive* | Positive | Positive |
| 6 | 76 | Surgery | 0.32 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 7 | 58 | Surgery | 1.32 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 8 | 58 | Surgery | 4.44 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 9 | 50 | Surgery/RT/QT/HT | 3.54 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 10 | 63 | Surgery | 1.7 | Positive | Positive | Negative |
| 11 | 76 | RT/HT | 138 | Positive* | Positive | Positive |
| 12 | 77 | Surgery/HT | 6 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 13 | 72 | Surgery | 0.55 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 14 | 64 | RT/HT | 4.33 | Equivocal | Positive | Positive |
| 15 | 71 | Surgery/RT/QT/HT | 6.5 | Positive | Positive | Negative |
| 16 | 67 | Surgery/RT | 3,5 | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| 17 | 55 | RT | 11 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 18 | 62 | RT/HT | 0.4 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 19 | 56 | Surgery | 0.88 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 20 | 66 | Surgery | 1.32 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 21 | 63 | Surgery | 0.3 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 22 | 65 | Surgery/RT | 1.29 | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| 23 | 63 | RT | 3.96 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 24 | 74 | RT | 7 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 25 | 73 | Surgery/RT/HT | 4.79 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 26 | 74 | Surgery/RT | 0.328 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 27 | 69 | Surgery/RT/HT | 5.8 | Equivocal | Positive* | Positive |
| 28 | 63 | RT/HT | 2.87 | Positive | Equivocal | Positive |
| 29 | 62 | Surgery/HT | 2.56 | Negative | Positive | Negative |
| 30 | 72 | RT | 1.76 | Equivocal | Positive | Positive |
| 31 | 60 | Surgery | 8.4 | Equivocal | Positive | Positive |
| 32 | 70 | Surgery/RT | 19 | Positive | Positive | Negative |
| 33 | 45 | Surgery | 0.2 | Negative | Negative | Negative |
| 34 | 60 | Surgery/RT/HT | 15 | Positive | Positive | Positive |
| 35 | 72 | Surgery | 3.16 | Equivocal | Positive | Positive |
| 36 | 63 | Surgery | 0.2 | Equivocal | Equivocal | Positive |
RT = Radiation Therapy; HT = Hormonal Therapy; QT = Chemo therapy; MR = Magnetic Resonance; “Positive*” = means “positive” at lymph nodes or bone lesions and “equivocal” at prostate bed
Fig. 1Patient 1. A 67-year-old patient treated with radiotherapy and hormonotherapy with PSA relapse (PSA level 8.7 ng/ml). MIP images with bone metastases (red arrows), scanned with 11C-Choline (a) and with 68Ga-PSMA (b). Metastasis in T11 demonstrated with both tracers (c). Right scapula (d) and left iliac crest (e) focal lesions demonstrated only with 68Ga-PSMA (yellow arrows)
Fig. 2Patient 5. A 68-year-old patient with PCa treated with radiotherapy and complete androgen blockade with current elements of biochemical relapse (PSA level 2.33 ng/ml), scanned with 11C-Choline (a) and with 68Ga-PSMA (b).Several metastases are demonstrated only by means of 68Ga-PSMA alone (red arrows). Yellow arrows show a metastatic retroperitoneal lymph node and a local relapse in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, while 11C-Choline PET/CT showed no suspicious lesion in these areas
Lesion localization according to technique
| 11C-Choline | 68Ga-PSMA | Pelvic MR | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient No | Prostate bed | Lymph nodes | Bone | Soft tissue | Total | Prostate bed | Lymph nodes | Bone | Soft tissue | Total | Prostate bed | Lymph nodes | Bone | Soft tissue | Total |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 18 | 38 | 0 | 57 | 1 | 27 | 65 | 0 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 38 | 48 | 0 | 98 | 17 | 84 | 82 | 0 | 183 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 31 |
Fig. 3Patient 8. A 58-year-old-patient with PSA relapse (PSA level 4.44 ng/ml) after radical prostatectomy. MIP (a), MR and 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR (b-c) images showing pelvic lymph node metastasis (yellow arrows)
Fig. 4Patient 2. A 61-year-old-patient treated with radiotherapy and hormonotherapy with PSA relapse (PSA level 10 ng/ml). MIP and axial 68Ga-PSMA PET (a-b), high-resolution T2 (c), DWI (d) and PET/MR images (e) demonstrating a coincident local relapse. DWI shows peripheral diffusion restriction that partially overlaps the lesion seen in T2 and perfectly matches PSMA uptake
Fig. 5Patient 36. MIP 68Ga-PSMA images (a) of a 68-year-old patient with PCa treated with surgery with current elements of biochemical relapse (PSA level 0.2 ng/ml).68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (b) and 68Ga-PSMA PET/MR images (c) without abnormal pelvic findings. DWI (d) and high-resolution T2 (e) MR scans show a local relapse lesion with restriction (arrows) that was hidden by physiological tracer bladder activity. The hypointense lesion involves the infundibulum in the right posterolateral prostate region. MR-DWI fusion images are shown in (f)