Rodolphe Nenert1, Jane B Allendorfer1, Amber M Martin1, Christi Banks2, Jennifer Vannest3, Scott K Holland3, Kimberly W Hart4, Christopher J Lindsell4,5, Jerzy P Szaflarski1,6,2. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 3. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 5. currently at Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recovery from stroke-induced aphasia is typically protracted and involves complex functional reorganization. The relative contributions of the lesioned and non-lesioned hemispheres to this process have been examined in several cross-sectional studies but longitudinal studies involving several time-points and large numbers of subjects are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to address the gaps in the literature by longitudinally studying the evolution of post-stroke lateralization and localization of language-related fMRI activation in the first year after single left hemispheric ischemic stroke. METHOD: Seventeen patients with stroke-induced aphasia were enrolled to undergo detailed behavioral testing and fMRI at 2, 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-stroke. Matched for age, handedness and sex participants were also enrolled to visualize canonical language regions. RESULTS: Behavioral results showed improvements over time for all but one of the behavioral scores (Semantic Fluency Test). FMRI results showed that the left temporal area participates in compensation for language deficits in the first year after stroke, that there is a correlation between behavioral improvement and the left cerebellar activation over time, and that there is a shift towards stronger frontal left-lateralization of the fMRI activation over the first year post-stroke. Temporary compensation observed in the initial phases of post-stroke recovery that involves the non-lesioned hemisphere may not be as important as previously postulated, since in this study the recovery was driven by activations in the left fronto-temporal regions. CONCLUSION: Language recovery after left hemispheric ischemic stroke is likely driven by the previously involved in language and attention left hemispheric networks.
BACKGROUND: Recovery from stroke-induced aphasia is typically protracted and involves complex functional reorganization. The relative contributions of the lesioned and non-lesioned hemispheres to this process have been examined in several cross-sectional studies but longitudinal studies involving several time-points and large numbers of subjects are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to address the gaps in the literature by longitudinally studying the evolution of post-stroke lateralization and localization of language-related fMRI activation in the first year after single left hemispheric ischemic stroke. METHOD: Seventeen patients with stroke-induced aphasia were enrolled to undergo detailed behavioral testing and fMRI at 2, 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-stroke. Matched for age, handedness and sex participants were also enrolled to visualize canonical language regions. RESULTS: Behavioral results showed improvements over time for all but one of the behavioral scores (Semantic Fluency Test). FMRI results showed that the left temporal area participates in compensation for language deficits in the first year after stroke, that there is a correlation between behavioral improvement and the left cerebellar activation over time, and that there is a shift towards stronger frontal left-lateralization of the fMRI activation over the first year post-stroke. Temporary compensation observed in the initial phases of post-stroke recovery that involves the non-lesioned hemisphere may not be as important as previously postulated, since in this study the recovery was driven by activations in the left fronto-temporal regions. CONCLUSION: Language recovery after left hemispheric ischemic stroke is likely driven by the previously involved in language and attention left hemispheric networks.
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson Journal: J Stroke Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 8.632
Authors: James Houston; Jane Allendorfer; Rodolph Nenert; Adam M Goodman; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Chao Zhang; Yingying Xia; Tao Feng; Ke Yu; Haiyan Zhang; Muhammad Umair Sami; Jie Xiang; Kai Xu Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Luca Pasquini; Alberto Di Napoli; Maria Camilla Rossi-Espagnet; Emiliano Visconti; Antonio Napolitano; Andrea Romano; Alessandro Bozzao; Kyung K Peck; Andrei I Holodny Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-02-18 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jerzy P Szaflarski; Rodolphe Nenert; Jane B Allendorfer; Amber N Martin; Amy W Amara; Joseph C Griffis; Aimee Dietz; Victor W Mark; Victor W Sung; Harrison C Walker; Xiaohua Zhou; Christopher J Lindsell Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2021-06-29
Authors: Viviana Versace; Kerstin Schwenker; Patrick B Langthaler; Stefan Golaszewski; Luca Sebastianelli; Francesco Brigo; Elke Pucks-Faes; Leopold Saltuari; Raffaele Nardone Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 4.003