Jennifer Dickman Portz1,2, Walter F LaMendola3. 1. 1 School of Medicine, Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 2. 2 College of Health and Human Sciences, School of Social Work, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 3. 3 Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Web-based self-management (web-based SM) interventions provide a potential resource for older adults to engage in their own chronic disease management. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of age on participation, retention, and utilization of a web-based SM intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reports the results of a secondary data analysis of the effects of age in a randomized trial of a web-based diabetes SM intervention. Participation, reasons for nonenrollment, retention, reasons for disenrollment, and website utilization were examined by age using discriminant function, survival analysis, and multivariate analysis of variance as appropriate. RESULTS:Website utilization by all participants dropped after 6 months but did not vary significantly with age. Though older adults (>60 of age) were less likely to choose to participate (F = 57.20, p < 0.001), a slight majority of participants in the experiment (53%) were over 66 years of age. Enrolled older adults utilized website management tools at a rate equivalent to younger participants. At termination, they often reported the experiment as burdensome, but tended to stay in the study longer than younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based SM offers a feasible approach for older adults with chronic disease to engage in their health management, but it needs to be improved. Those older adults who passed the rigorous screens for this experiment and chose to participate may have been more likely than younger participants to utilize web-based SM intervention tools. They were more persistent in their use of the web-based SM to try to improve health outcomes and formed definitive opinions about its utility before termination.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Web-based self-management (web-based SM) interventions provide a potential resource for older adults to engage in their own chronic disease management. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of age on participation, retention, and utilization of a web-based SM intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study reports the results of a secondary data analysis of the effects of age in a randomized trial of a web-based diabetes SM intervention. Participation, reasons for nonenrollment, retention, reasons for disenrollment, and website utilization were examined by age using discriminant function, survival analysis, and multivariate analysis of variance as appropriate. RESULTS: Website utilization by all participants dropped after 6 months but did not vary significantly with age. Though older adults (>60 of age) were less likely to choose to participate (F = 57.20, p < 0.001), a slight majority of participants in the experiment (53%) were over 66 years of age. Enrolled older adults utilized website management tools at a rate equivalent to younger participants. At termination, they often reported the experiment as burdensome, but tended to stay in the study longer than younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Web-based SM offers a feasible approach for older adults with chronic disease to engage in their health management, but it needs to be improved. Those older adults who passed the rigorous screens for this experiment and chose to participate may have been more likely than younger participants to utilize web-based SM intervention tools. They were more persistent in their use of the web-based SM to try to improve health outcomes and formed definitive opinions about its utility before termination.
Authors: Tracy L Mitzner; Julie B Boron; Cara Bailey Fausset; Anne E Adams; Neil Charness; Sara J Czaja; Katinka Dijkstra; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers; Joseph Sharit Journal: Comput Human Behav Date: 2010-11-01
Authors: Michael Stellefson; Beth Chaney; Adam E Barry; Enmanuel Chavarria; Bethany Tennant; Kim Walsh-Childers; P S Sriram; Justin Zagora Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Peter Hanlon; Luke Daines; Christine Campbell; Brian McKinstry; David Weller; Hilary Pinnock Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lucy Yardley; Bonnie J Spring; Heleen Riper; Leanne G Morrison; David H Crane; Kristina Curtis; Gina C Merchant; Felix Naughton; Ann Blandford Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: M Sue Kirkman; Vanessa Jones Briscoe; Nathaniel Clark; Hermes Florez; Linda B Haas; Jeffrey B Halter; Elbert S Huang; Mary T Korytkowski; Medha N Munshi; Peggy Soule Odegard; Richard E Pratley; Carrie S Swift Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Steven S Coughlin; Judith J Prochaska; Lovoria B Williams; Gina M Besenyi; Vahé Heboyan; D Stephen Goggans; Wonsuk Yoo; Gianluca De Leo Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy Date: 2017-04-07
Authors: Nicola Coley; Laurine Andre; Marieke P Hoevenaar-Blom; Tiia Ngandu; Cathrien Beishuizen; Mariagnese Barbera; Lennard van Wanrooij; Miia Kivipelto; Hilkka Soininen; Willem van Gool; Carol Brayne; Eric Moll van Charante; Edo Richard; Sandrine Andrieu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 7.076