Literature DB >> 29781944

Early Comparative Outcomes of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Plate in the Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures.

Phillip M Mitchell1, Adam K Lee2, Cory A Collinge1, Bruce H Ziran3, Kate G Hartley4, A Alex Jahangir1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early clinical results of distal femur fractures treated with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates compared with stainless steel (SS) lateral locking plates.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study.
SETTING: ACS Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two patients (11 SS, 11 CFR-PEEK) with closed distal femur fractures treated by a single surgeon over a 6-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunion, hardware failure, reoperation, time to full weight-bearing, and time union were assessed.
RESULTS: The CFR-PEEK cohort was on average older (71 vs. 57 years, P = 0.03) and more likely to have diabetes (P = 0.02). Nonunion was diagnosed in 4/11 (36%) patients in the SS group and 1/11 (9%) patients in the CFR-PEEK group (P = 0.12). Hardware failure occurred in 2 SS patients (18%) compared with none in the CFR-PEEK group (P = 0.14). Time to full weight-bearing was similar between groups, occurring at 9.9 and 12.4 weeks in the CFR-PEEK and SS groups, respectively (P = 0.23). Time to radiographic union averaged 12.4 weeks in the SS group and 18.7 weeks in the CFR-PEEK group (P = 0.26). There were 4 reoperations in the SS group and 1 in the CFR-PEEK group (P = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: CFR-PEEK plates show encouraging short-term results in the treatment of distal femur fractures with a comparable nonunion, reoperation, and hardware failure rates to those treated with SS plates. This data suggest that CFR-PEEK plates may be a viable alternative to SS plates in fixation of these fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781944     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  Letter to the editor Re: Theivendran et al. (Theivendran K, Arshad F, Hanif UK, Reito A, Griffin X, Foote CJ. Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;23:101,674).

Authors:  George D Chloros; Apostolos D Prodromidis
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-23

Review 2.  Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kanthan Theivendran; Faizan Arshad; Umar-Khetaab Hanif; Aleksi Reito; Xavier Griffin; Clary J Foote
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-28

3.  Fracture fixation in extremity trauma with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates: evidence today.

Authors:  George D Chloros; Apostolos D Prodromidis; Jo Wilson; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  From Bench to Bedside: Radiolucent Implants-Better Visualization or Camouflaged Gimmick?

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 5.  Intramedullary nail: the past, present and the future - a review exploring where the future may lead us.

Authors:  Noah Wong Wei Kang; Wen Po Jonathan Tan; Yue Min Crystal Phua; Amelia Tan Gek Min; Kishan Naidu; Kandiah Umapathysivam; Peter Jonathan Smitham
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-07-10

Review 6.  Experimental testing of fracture fixation plates: A review.

Authors:  Shiling Zhang; Dharmesh Patel; Mark Brady; Sherri Gambill; Kanthan Theivendran; Subodh Deshmukh; John Swadener; Sarah Junaid; Laura Jane Leslie
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.763

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.