Literature DB >> 29781326

Progression-free survival with endocrine-based therapies following progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Rajeev Ayyagari1, Derek Tang2, Oscar Patterson-Lomba1, Zhou Zhou1, Jipan Xie1, David Chandiwana2, Anand A Dalal2, Polly Ann Niravath3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the comparative efficacy of currently available endocrine-based therapies (ETs) for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) progression.
DESIGN: Network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS: Randomized clinical trials of ETs for HR+/HER2- mBC were identified via a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and key conference proceedings. All trials met the following inclusion criteria: (1) included women with HR+/HER2- mBC; (2) previous treatment with ETs or chemotherapy as first-line therapy; (3) treatment with ET as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy; (4) progression-free survival (PFS) was reported; and (5) published in 2007 (when HER2 testing became standardized) or later. Regimens were compared using pairwise hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) of PFS obtained from a Bayesian NMA. Treatments with different approved dosages were pooled into the same arm; anastrozole and exemestane were pooled as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) due to clinical similarities.
RESULTS: A total of 4 trials and 6 regimens (palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI, fulvestrant + AI, fulvestrant and AI) were eligible for inclusion. Palbociclib + fulvestrant and everolimus + AI had 50% and 55% reduced hazard of progression or death vs. AI (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), respectively. Palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI and everolimus + fulvestrant had 54%, 58% and 40% reduced hazard vs. fulvestrant (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), while palbociclib + fulvestrant and everolimus + AI had 52% and 55% reduced hazard vs. fulvestrant + AI (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who had previously failed an NSAI and received palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI or everolimus + fulvestrant had longer PFS compared to those who received fulvestrant or AI alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HR+/HER2−; Metastatic breast cancer; endocrine-based therapies; network meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781326     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1479246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in combination with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yumei Guan; Guoshuang Shen; Qianqian Fang; Yuanfang Xin; Xingfa Huo; Jinming Li; Fuxing Zhao; Dengfeng Ren; Zhen Liu; Zitao Li; Jiuda Zhao
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tingting Zhang; Fubin Feng; Wenge Zhao; Yan Yao; Jinhui Tian; Chao Zhou; Chuanxin Zang; Cun Liu; Xue Wang; Changgang Sun
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Endocrine therapy-based treatments in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mariana Brandão; Christian Maurer; Patricia Klarmann Ziegelmann; Noam F Pondé; Arlindo Ferreira; Samuel Martel; Martine Piccart; Evandro de Azambuja; Márcio Debiasi; Matteo Lambertini
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-08

4.  Should All Patients With HR-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Receive CDK 4/6 Inhibitor As First-Line Based Therapy? A Network Meta-Analysis of Data from the PALOMA 2, MONALEESA 2, MONALEESA 7, MONARCH 3, FALCON, SWOG and FACT Trials.

Authors:  Valentina Rossi; Paola Berchialla; Diana Giannarelli; Cecilia Nisticò; Gianluigi Ferretti; Simona Gasparro; Michelangelo Russillo; Giovanna Catania; Leonardo Vigna; Rossella Letizia Mancusi; Emilio Bria; Filippo Montemurro; Francesco Cognetti; Alessandra Fabi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Association of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 Inhibitors With Survival in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinming Li; Xingfa Huo; Fuxing Zhao; Dengfeng Ren; Raees Ahmad; Xinyue Yuan; Feng Du; Jiuda Zhao
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-10-01

Review 6.  Expanding the Clinical Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer from Metastatic Setting to Adjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Baha' Sharaf
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.162

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.