Literature DB >> 29781216

Measuring inequalities in the demographical and geographical distribution of physicians in China: Generalist versus specialist.

Jingxian Wu1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The equitable distribution of both generalist and specialist physicians is vital in establishing a fair and efficient health care system. The presents study aims at comparatively measuring the demographical and geographical distribution of generalist and specialist physicians in China from 2012 to 2016.
METHODS: The data were obtained from China Health and Family Planning Statistics and China Statistical Yearbooks 2013 to 2017. Descriptive statistical methods were used to address the quantity and density of physicians, and Gini coefficient was adopted as inequality indicator to trace their distribution inequalities.
RESULTS: The quantity and density of total physicians, generalist, and specialist physicians increased during the last 5 years. The demographic distribution inequalities of total physicians, generalist, and specialist physicians are decent with Gini coefficients of approximately 0.3, whereas the corresponding geographical distribution inequalities are severe with Gini coefficients higher than 0.6. Compared with generalist physicians, specialist physicians not only had a higher geographical and geographical density but also maintained a more equitable distribution.
CONCLUSION: The present study compares the distribution inequalities between generalist and specialist physicians in China for the first time. Despite the rapid increase in quantity and density of these physicians, the whole nation faces a severe shortage and maldistribution of generalist physicians. The increase in the number of physicians has not necessarily eliminated the geographical distribution inequalities. The government should consider all influencing factors when allocating health workers and continue promoting the development of primary health care to alleviate these inequalities in physician distribution.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  China; Gini coefficient; distribution inequality; generalist physician; specialist physician

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781216     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  6 in total

1.  Assessing Spatial Accessibility to Medical Resources at the Community Level in Shenzhen, China.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Shuang Zhong; Wei Tu; Jing Zheng; Shenjing He; Junzhe Bao; Cunrui Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Feasibility and efficacy of nurse-led team management intervention for improving the self-management of type 2 diabetes patients in a Chinese community: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhihua Guo; Jing Liu; Hui Zeng; Guoping He; Xiaohong Ren; Jia Guo
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Gender Differences and Influencing Factors in Specialty Choices: Findings From One Medical School in China.

Authors:  Kanhua Yin; Liu Yang; Rui Zhang; Difan Zheng; Michael S Wilkes; Yanni Lai
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Incorporating Medical Supply and Demand into the Index of Physician Maldistribution Improves the Sensitivity to Healthcare Outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Takayama; Hemant Poudyal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Analysis of inequality in the distribution of general practitioners in China: evidence from 2012 to 2018.

Authors:  Le Yang; Jingmin Cheng
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 1.792

6.  Inequalities in healthcare resources and outcomes threatening sustainable health development in Ethiopia: panel data analysis.

Authors:  Abraha Woldemichael; Amirhossein Takian; Ali Akbari Sari; Alireza Olyaeemanesh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.