| Literature DB >> 29780943 |
Michael J Gale1, Hope E Titus1, Gareth A Harman1, Talal Alabduljalil1, Anna Dennis2, Jenny L Wilson2, David M Koeller3, Erika Finanger2, Peter A Blasco2, Pei-Wen Chiang1, Daniel J Karr1, Paul Yang1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We present the first detailed ophthalmic description of a child with Helsmoortel-Van der Aa Syndrome (HVDAS), including longitudinal follow-up and analysis. OBSERVATIONS: After extensive workup, a young child with poor visual behavior, hypotonic cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, and global developmental delay was found to have a heterozygous de novo mutation in the ADNP gene and diagnosed with HVDAS. Ophthalmic findings were remarkable for progressive nystagmus, macular pigment mottling, mild foveal hypoplasia with abnormal macular laminations, persistent rod dysfunction with electronegative waveform, and progressive cone degeneration. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with HVDAS are known to have abnormal visual behavior due to refractive or cortical impairment. However, we present the first description, to our knowledge, of an association with retinal mal-development and degeneration. Thus, patients with HVDAS should be referred for ophthalmic genetics evaluation, and HVDAS should be on the differential diagnosis for young children with global developmental delay who present with nystagmus, rod and cone dysfunction with electronegative waveform, and relative lack of severe structural degeneration on optical coherence tomography.Entities:
Keywords: ADNP; Activity-dependent neuroprotective protein; Electronegative waveform; HVDAS; Helsmoortel-Van der Aa Syndrome; Nystagmus; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal degeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 29780943 PMCID: PMC5956711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.03.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ISSN: 2451-9936
Fig. 1Optical Coherence Tomography: Analysis and Segmentation Profiles.
Upper Panel: Image of patient's right macula at 1.3 years of age, with only the temporal macula segmented to illustrate the various retinal layers that were analyzed.
Lower Panel: Retinal layer thicknesses at each age plotted against the normal mean and 95% confidence interval.
y/o, years old; CI, confidence interval; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; RGC+, retinal ganglion cell layer plus inner plexiform layer; INL, inner nuclear layer; ONL, outer nuclear layer; IS/OS, inner segment/outer segment junction; COST, cone outer segment tips; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; REC+, photoreceptor layer from Bruch's membrane to the INL/outer plexiform layer interface; TR, total retina; negative and positive retinal eccentricity is temporal and nasal to the foveola, respectively.
Fig. 2Full-Field Electroretinogram.
Upper Panel: The waveforms for the patient are shown for each stimulus at 1.3 and 3.9 years of age, along with the respective age-matched normal waveforms, to illustrate the persistence of the electronegative waveform and attenuation of all responses in both eyes.
Lower Panel: The a and b wave amplitudes, averaged from both eyes of the patient, are plotted over time and presented as a percentage of the mean of age-matched normal. With the exception of the initial rise in all amplitudes from 1.3 to 1.9 years of age due to delayed maturation, the scotopic dim amplitudes show stable dysfunction of the rod-dependent responses, while the photopic amplitudes show cone degeneration.
y/o, years old; OD, ocular dextrous; OS, ocular sinistrous; Hz, hertz.
Full-field electroretinogram.
| Patient Age | 1.3 yrs | 1.9 yrs | 2.9 yrs | 3.9 yrs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amplitude, | Implicit | Amplitude, | Implicit | Amplitude, | Implicit | Amplitude, | Implicit | |
| Scotopic dim | ||||||||
| b wave | 25 (12%) | 105 | 145 (54%) | 104 | 101 (39%) | 104 | 130 (51%) | 114 |
| Scotopic bright | ||||||||
| a wave | 92 (54%) | 17 | 258 (121%) | 16 | 187 (74%) | 16 | 254 (98%) | 16 |
| b wave | 72 (20%) | 56 | 270 (60%) | 61 | 196 (40%) | 58 | 246 (64%) | 64 |
| b:a ratio | 0.78 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.97 | ||||
| OP | 40 | 120 | 98 | 161 | ||||
| Photopic single | ||||||||
| a wave | 16 (45%) | 16 | 38 (87%) | 15 | 29 (51%) | 15 | 23 (44%) | 16 |
| b wave | 61 (48%) | 31 | 132 (86%) | 29 | 93 (47%) | 31 | 65 (37%) | 27 |
| Photopic 30-Hz | 48 (75%) | 30 | 64 (90%) | 29 | 52 (52%) | 29 | 63 (67%) | 29 |
Amplitudes were the average of the right- and left-eye responses for all measurements and are also presented in parentheses as a percentage of the mean of age-matched normal response.
ms, millisecond; nl, normal; OP, oscillatory potential; yrs, years.