| Literature DB >> 29780783 |
Bukunmi Michael Idowu1, Bolanle Olubunmi Ibitoye1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To sonographically evaluate the dominant fibroid nodule vascularity and flow velocity pattern of perifibroid and intrafibroid arteries.Entities:
Keywords: Doppler ultrasonography; Fibroid uterus; Leiomyoma; Myomectomy; Uterine artery
Year: 2018 PMID: 29780783 PMCID: PMC5956124 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.3.395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Sci ISSN: 2287-8572
Fig. 1Longitudinal triplex sonogram of a myomatous uterus showing the waveform pattern and Doppler indices of a perifibroid (peripheral) artery.
Fig. 2Longitudinal triplex sonogram of a myomatous uterus showing the waveform pattern and Doppler indices of an intrafibroid (core) artery.
Comparison of the fibroid artery Doppler indices of subjects
| Doppler indices | PFA | IFA | PFA vs. IFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSV (cm/s) | 52.1±24.7 | 45.4±28.9 | <0.001 | PSV | <0.001 |
| EDV (cm/s) | 21.1±12.5 | 22.4±14.0 | <0.001 | EDV | 0.013 |
| TAMX (cm/s) | 31.5±16.4 | 30.4±18.5 | <0.001 | TAMX | <0.001 |
| T | 14.3±9.6 | 13.8±8.9 | <0.001 | T | <0.001 |
| PI | 1.1±0.4 | 0.8±0.3 | <0.001 | PI | <0.001 |
| RI | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | <0.001 | RI | <0.001 |
| SDR | 2.7±0.8 | 2.1±0.5 | <0.001 | SDR | <0.001 |
| ImI | 2.7±0.7 | 2.1±0.4 | <0.001 | ImI | <0.001 |
| DAR | 0.7±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 | <0.001 | DAR | <0.001 |
PFA, perifibroid artery; IFA, intrafibroid artery; vs., post hoc analysis; PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; TAMX, time-averaged maximum velocity; Tmean, time-averaged mean velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistive index; SDR, systolic-diastolic ratio; ImI, impedance index; DAR, diastolic average ratio.
a)Friedman's analysis of variance applied; b)Related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test applied for post hoc analysis.
Effect of dominant fibroid nodule volume on perifibroid artery Doppler indices
| Doppler indices | Dominant nodule volume | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤200.0 cm3 (n=80) | >200.0 cm3 (n=57) | ||
| PSV (cm/s) | 44.7±19.7 | 62.5±27.3 | <0.001 |
| EDV (cm/s) | 16.7±9.0 | 27.6±13.8 | <0.001 |
| TAMX (cm/s) | 25.7±12.3 | 39.7±18.0 | <0.001 |
| T | 11.3±7.8 | 18.4±10.4 | <0.001 |
| PI | 1.2±0.4 | 0.9±0.4 | <0.001 |
| RI | 0.6±0.1 | 0.6±0.1 | <0.001 |
| SDR | 2.9±0.7 | 2.4±0.7 | <0.001 |
| ImI | 2.9±0.7 | 2.4±0.6 | <0.001 |
| DAR | 0.6±0.1 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.002 |
PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; TAMX, time-averaged maximum velocity; Tmean, time-averaged mean velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistive index; SDR, systolic-diastolic ratio; ImI, impedance index; DAR, diastolic average ratio.
a)Mann-Whitney U test applied.
Effect of dominant fibroid nodule volume on intrafibroid artery Doppler indices
| Doppler indices | Dominant nodule volume | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤200.0 cm3 (n=30) | >200.0 cm3 (n=31) | ||
| PSV (cm/s) | 43.0±30.6 | 47.7±27.6 | 0.35 |
| EDV (cm/s) | 20.0±14.1 | 24.7±13.8 | 0.07 |
| TAMX (cm/s) | 27.2±18.5 | 33.2±18.4 | 0.09 |
| T | 13.1±9.0 | 14.6±9.0 | 0.52 |
| PI | 0.9±0.2 | 0.7±0.2 | 0.01 |
| RI | 0.5±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.01 |
| SDR | 2.3±0.5 | 2.0±0.5 | 0.01 |
| ImI | 2.3±0.4 | 1.9±0.5 | 0.01 |
| DAR | 0.7±0.2 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.22 |
PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; TAMX, time-averaged maximum velocity; Tmean, time-averaged mean velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistive index; SDR, systolic-diastolic ratio; ImI, impedance index; DAR, diastolic average ratio.
a)Mann-Whitney U test applied.
Effect of previous myomectomy on intrafibroid artery Doppler indices
| Doppler indices | History of previous myomectomy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Present (n=14) | Absent (n=126) | ||
| PSV (cm/s) | 43.4±18.3 | 45.7±30.2 | 0.75 |
| EDV (cm/s) | 19.0±12.4 | 22.8±14.3 | 0.42 |
| TAMX (cm/s) | 26.3±16.7 | 30.8±18.8 | 0.44 |
| T | 14.3±9.5 | 13.8±9.0 | 0.77 |
| PI | 1.0±0.3 | 0.8±0.2 | 0.03 |
| RI | 0.6±0.1 | 0.5±0.1 | 0.03 |
| SDR | 2.5±0.6 | 2.1±0.5 | 0.03 |
| ImI | 2.6±0.6 | 2.1±0.4 | 0.03 |
| DAR | 0.8±0.4 | 0.7±0.1 | 0.46 |
PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; TAMX, time-averaged maximum velocity; Tmean, time-averaged mean velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistive index; SDR, systolic-diastolic ratio; ImI, impedance index; DAR, diastolic average ratio.
a)Mann-Whitney U test applied.
Correlationa) between dominant fibroid nodule volume and Doppler indices of fibroid arteries
| Doppler indices | Perifibroid artery (n=137) | Intrafibroid artery (n=61) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation coefficient | Correlation coefficient | |||
| PSV (cm/s) | 0.3 | <0.001 | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| EDV (cm/s) | 0.5 | <0.001 | 0.3 | 0.01 |
| TAMX (cm/s) | 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.3 | 0.03 |
| T | 0.4 | <0.001 | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| PI | −0.4 | <0.001 | −0.5 | <0.001 |
| RI | −0.4 | <0.001 | −0.5 | <0.001 |
| SDR | −0.4 | <0.001 | −0.5 | <0.001 |
| ImI | −0.4 | <0.001 | −0.5 | <0.001 |
| DAR | 0.3 | <0.001 | 0.3 | 0.02 |
PSV, peak systolic velocity; EDV, end-diastolic velocity; TAMX, time-averaged maximum velocity; Tmean, time-averaged mean velocity; PI, pulsatility index; RI, resistive index; SDR, systolic-diastolic ratio; ImI, impedance index; DAR, diastolic average ratio.
a)Spearman correlation applied.